My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-11-1981 Additions I
>
City Council Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1981
>
02-11-1981 Additions I
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/15/2013 2:35:45 PM
Creation date
5/15/2013 2:35:13 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
NEWS RELEASE <br />3/9/81 <br />SEWER TREATMENT OF LAKE WATER TO COST SUBURBS MILLIONS <br />At the request of the City of St. Paul, the Metropolitan Council <br />recently ordered the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) <br />to alter its current fee system and charge several northern Ramsey <br />County suburban communities an extra 1 to 1.7 million dollars next <br />year. These costs are for treating at the Pigs Eye sewage treat- <br />ment plant the clear lake water that flows out of Beaver, Phalen, <br />Como and McCarrons Lakes. <br />This water historically flowed southerly to the Mississippi River, <br />but over the years, St. Paul allowed filling and development along <br />the natural channels, until it was no longer adequate. St. Paul <br />then put the lake overflows into combined sewer pipes. This meant <br />raw sewage was mixed with the lake water and the entire flow taken <br />to the sewage treatment plant. St. Paul also put its own storm <br />water collection facilities into the combined sewers. Such com- <br />bined flows resulted in volumes which were too large for the plant <br />to handle and the sewage was, therefore, bypassed directly into <br />the river, whenever large rainfalls occurred. <br />The suburbs, on the other hand, all spent the necessary funds to <br />construct one sewer system for sanitary sewers and a separate sewer <br />system for storm water. These, plus retaining wetlands and ponding <br />areas, provided a proper method of dealing with clear water flows. <br />Other older cities, such as Minneapolis, have taken major agressive <br />actions to separate their combined sewers, rather than ignoring the <br />problems and asking to have their suburbs pay for clear water sewer <br />treatment. St. Paul has known about the MWCC fee system for ten <br />years and has paid millions of dollars in fees, but still left the <br />lake overflows in combined sewers. Even these large annual payments <br />failed to cause St. Paul to separate the sewers. Their staff recent- <br />ly told the Metropolitan Council that they did not even have preli- <br />minary plans prepared for such projects after all these years. <br />Recent statements by the City of St. Paul have incorrectly suggested <br />that the suburbs have not teen willing to discuss this problem. No <br />one from the City of St. Paul has ever contacted Roseville since I <br />have served on the city council (eight years). <br />Only St. Paul has the authority to carry out such separation actions. <br />The suburbs have no power to force St. Paul to act. It is obvious <br />that if St. Paul would not separate the sewers when they paid the <br />charges that they will not do it now, or in the future, with someone <br />else paying the costs. <br />The continuation of the clear water flows to the treatment plant will <br />result in huge cost increases to the entire metro area. The future <br />plant alterations to meet federal water quality standards will see <br />very expensive treatment occurring on the clear water. Also, the <br />practice of bypassing flows directly to the river will bring lawsuits <br />from downstream communities for violation of the standards. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.