07-28-1982 Council Agenda - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES amity Council April 22, 1981 The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. Hanson. Ayes (5) Scalze, Hanson, Forsberg, Nardini, Fahey. Noyes (0). Resolution declared adopted. This resolution appears in Resolution Book No. 7, Page 132. Zilge & The Engineer reported that he has contacted propertyowners in the area R & S of the Zilge property concerning providing road access through to Property Woodlyn Avenue. A. C. Black has no objection to the proposal as Division they have all their improvements in and would not be assessed for additional road improvement. Mr. Donovan is not interested in the improvement and stated that he would oppose it. Mr. Deeb does not want an additional road. Mr. McGuff is also not interested in the improvement. The Engineer reported that McGuff is storing equipment on his property and the Engineer informed him that at such time as he came in for a building permit, the City would probably require a road easement from him. Mrs. Scalze asked if Mr. McGuff could store equipment without a permit. The City Clerk replied that under the new ordinance a permit is required. Mr. Zilge reported that Mr. Deeb is not against an easement on his property for emergency vehicles, but he does not want a road. Mr. Zilge also stated that Preferred Sheetmetal, Field Economy, R & S and Empire Bucket do not want a road. Mr. Zilge stated that R & S would just like to build a storage shed. The shed would cause no additional traffic in the area. The shed would be used to store parts and autos. Mrs. Scalze informed Mr. Zilge that the City has no way to get access into that area unless someone comes in for a building permit. Mrs. Scalze stated that the City must provide for access for that property, as in the next 20 years the property will change. Mr. Fahey suggested that the Council require that a road easement be dedicated along the water works property. The Engineer stated that there were problems with some of the alternatives the Planner proposed for road access, and suggested that the road easement run along the water works property. Bill Gervais asked the Council if anyone has contacted the water works re- garding crossing the water works property to Ryan's development. Mr. Forsberg suggested that the City Engineer look into this. The Engineer stated that this alternative would be expensive as the City would have to construct a bridge to go over pipes on the water works property. Mr. Forsberg introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 81 -4 -199 - APPROVING THE ZILGE PROPERTY DIVISION CONTINGENT UPON THE GRANTING TO THE CITY OF A 40 -FOOT ROAD EASEMENT ALONG THE WATER WORKS PROPERTY