08-25-1982 Council Agenda - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

PLANNING COMMISSION August 5, 1982 Stenger Property (Cont.) The Planner informed the Commission that the problem came about because in the past the City did not require surveys. When Mr. Stenger finally had a survey done he found out that he did not get all of. Hanna Street. Mr. Ducharme asked the principles involved in the North Investment Group who are the owners of this property. The Planner replied that along with Mr. Stenger he believes Keith Harsted and Ray Mc Culip are principles. Mr. LeMay asked what happens if the variance is not granted. The Planner replied that the property could not be split. Mr. Stenger would have to continue to try to obtain additional land. The Planner stated that he did not think '.ir. Stenger could obtain the additional 15 feet from the Frattalone property as the building is too close to the property line for this to be done. The Planner commented that he can understand Mr. Stenger's assuming that he would receive Hanna Street. Mrs. Nardini pointed out that the mini — storage buildings have a drive between the two buildings and there is not a turn — around. The Planner stated that the garage doors face the center and this is what was approved by the City. The Planner stated that there is about 25 feet between the buildings. Mr. French asked if the property had access other than Park Street. The Planner replied that there is an easement on the other end of the property which leads to County Road C. Mr. LeMay asked if the easement was shown on the abstract for the property. The Planner commented that it was a good access and also the access for the Frattalone property. Mrs. Nardini commented that when Mr. Frattalone moves his business, there may be a different use for this access. The Planner suggested that perhaps the City Attorney should check out this easement. Mr. LeMay stated that he did not see that there was a hardship pertaining to this variance request. The Planner replied that currently the three buildings are non — conforming, as there are three buildings on one piece of property. By splicing the property that non — conformity would be eliminated and the City would have the non — conformity of the variance. Mr. DeLonais moved that the variance be granted as requested provided that the storage buildings are located in one legal description. lotion seconded by Mr. Ducharme. Motion carried 4 — 1. Mr. LeMay voted against. Page -6-