Laserfiche WebLink
JEROME M. HUGHES <br />President of the Senate <br />Room 328 State Capitol <br />St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 <br />(612) 296-4183 <br />Mr. Joseph G. Chlebeck <br />Clerk, City of Little Canada <br />515 Little Canada Road <br />Little Canada, MN 55117 <br />Dear Mr. Chlebeck: <br />Senate <br />State of Minnesota <br />August 3, 1983 <br />Now that the 1983 legislative session is over, I am taking this opportunity <br />to explain the 1983 local government aid portion of the tax bill which was <br />enacted. <br />Earlier this year you expressed your concerns over a more equitable distribution <br />of aids and suggested other changes, including the elimination of the grand- <br />father provisions of the aid formula. I would like to point out the areas in <br />which your concerns and those of your colleagues were addressed. <br />Quite frankly, the local government aid formula was the center of intense <br />controversy during the session as lawmakers wrangled with the need to reduce <br />future state expenditures while continuing to provide adequate assistance for <br />education and other vital human services, as well as maintaining property tax <br />relief. The focus of our property tax efforts was justifiably to target relief <br />in order to equalize the tax burden across the state. <br />The final version of the tax bill, as you already know, makes minor modifica- <br />tions to the system itself, which essentially maintains the concept adopted in <br />1979. By far, the most significant change made was the elimination of the <br />"grandfather clause" which had guaranteed that no local government could receive <br />aid reductions from year to year. In addition, the new bill provides that local <br />governments themselves will be able to levy for the reduction amount in order <br />to maintain services. The grandfather elimination and increased local levying <br />authority have been offset by an aid loss limit which guarantees that reductions <br />to any city will not result in an increase in property taxes for more than <br />three - quarters of one equalized mill. For an average property owner, this will <br />mean a tax increase of less than one percent, or about $8 to $10 in gross taxes <br />on a $60,000 home. <br />The local government aids system, I believe, inherently attempts to minimize <br />any encouragement to local governmental units to become high spenders because <br />it was, after all, originally established with reference to a prior year -- <br />that is, established in 1979 for the levy made and aids calculated in 1978. <br />E" <br />u <br />CONINI11"1'P:ES • ('hairm;m. Election. ;Hid Lou,. • Rule, and : \dmnn.trauon • Finance • F:duenuon <br />