Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF LITTLE CANADA <br />RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA <br />Office of: <br />JOSEPH G. CHLEBECK, Clerk <br />515 Little Canada Road <br />Little Canada, Minn. 55117 <br />484 -2177 <br />January 4, 1983 <br />Mr. Peter Erickson <br />Hearing Examiner <br />Office of Administrative Hearings <br />4th Floor Summit Bank Building <br />310 4th Ave. S. <br />Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415 <br />Dear Mr. Erickson: <br />MAYOR <br />Raymond Hanson <br />COUNCIL <br />Michael Fahey <br />Beverly Scalze <br />Dennis Forsberg <br />Mugs Nardini <br />I wish to express my support relative to the Proposed Optional Appendix <br />E Automated Fire Suppression Systems. <br />Fire and Police Protection services are two major concerns for local <br />governments. Not only are they costly budgetary items, but also, they <br />are services which must be paid for out of the general funds, which <br />plainly stated are taxes. <br />Many communities, Little <br />Fiscal Disparities Act. <br />density apartment units. <br />the purposes of creating <br />bility for providing the <br />lice protection, without <br />acute problem. <br />Canada specifically, have been victims of the <br />They have developed with businesses and high <br />There is nothing wrong with that concept for <br />a more favorable tax base, but the responsi- <br />necessary protective services, fire and po- <br />equitable tax collection is becoming a more <br />Federal, State and County fiscal aids are decreasing. <br />In an effort to continue to provide adequate fire protection, at a <br />reasonable cost to the taxpayers, it seems only fair to allow communi- <br />ties greater latitude in trying to meet these costs. I do not feel <br />it to be an injustice to require large developers to augment local <br />fire protection services by the strengthening of local community <br />sprinkler requirements. <br />In fact I feel it to be mutually advantageous to both the community <br />and the developers. <br />69. <br />