My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-08-06 Planning Comm. Minutes
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
06-08-06 Planning Comm. Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2008 9:31:49 AM
Creation date
4/23/2008 9:28:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTUS <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />JUNI; 8, 2006 <br />Knudsen stated that there is a lot of due diligence that will have to be done <br />relative to drainage. There could be significant changes in the plat based <br />on the findings of wetland impact statements, etc. Knudsen noted that the <br />City wants to understand the concerns of the neighborhood at Chis point. <br />Nothing will happen with this concept development unless it moves to the <br />next phase. If it does, there will be another public hearing as well as in- <br />depth review of engineering details. <br />Sharon Sculley stated Chat their family has tried Co impress on people that <br />their property was once dry land. She indicated that even best practices <br />does not always go as planned, and was concerned that the onus is on the <br />properCy owner Co protect their property pitting one owner against another. <br />John Sculley, 3000 LaBore Road, reported that over the years his family <br />has had discussions with the City Council on the issue of how <br />development has impacted the wetland area on his property. He reported <br />that Council members have walked through his properCy and have seen the <br />changes on the Maplewood/Little Canada border. He further noted that <br />anyone who grew up in the area has seen the changes as well. <br />Sculley reported that the development over the years has changed the <br />direction of the natural run-off. He pointed out the holding pond that was <br />constructed at the south end of this area that also impacted the natural run- <br />off. Sculley stated that as a result of what has occurred over the years, he <br />has very little faith in engineers and those people who are supposed Co <br />oversee projects to ensure that they are done correctly. Sculley felt that a <br />property owner should be able to do whatever they desire with their <br />property within reason, but pointed out that as a result of surrounding <br />development he now has 15 acres of property that he can only get to by <br />four-wheeler. Sculley felt that this is the result of engineering that was <br />reviewed by Maplewood, Ramsey County, and the State of Minnesota. <br />Sculley stated that his hope for Mr. Johnson's concept development is that <br />Che City insists run-off is controlled from the north Co Che south. Sculley <br />felt there was no reason a property owner should have their property <br />devalued because engineers will not listen to the people who live in the <br />area. <br />Knudsen stated that he agrees with Mr. Sculley's commenCS and indicated <br />Chat Che Commission wants to hear the comments and concerns of the <br />neighborhood. However, the review is conceptual at this point and there <br />has not been a lot of detail analysis done as of yet. <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.