Laserfiche WebLink
industry has built homes that had to meet the state building code (until 1975), <br />or HUD construction and safety standards (since 1976). The typical flat - <br />roofed, metal -clad, single -wide mobile home of the past has given way to <br />pitched roof, double -wide manufactured homes that have a variety of attractive <br />sidings. Manufactured homes built since 1976 are generally more fire resistant <br />and better insulated than state building code requirements for stick -built <br />homes. Finally, manufactured homes are generally the lowest -cost housing per <br />square foot available. In today's economy they offer the opportunity to <br />provide good quality, affordable housing. <br />Rep. Voss said one reason he sponsored the legislation was that many cities <br />around the state had effectively prohibited manufactured housing from locating <br />in their communities. He noted that not only did zoning ordinances prevent <br />manufactured housing in single - family neighborhoods, relegating them to mobile <br />home parks, but that only one new mobile home park had been permitted to open <br />in the Metropolitan Area in the last two years. He said manufactured homes <br />offer safe, affordable housing and should not be treated as second class <br />housing. The legislation prohibits such unfair discrimination against <br />manufactured housing. It requires that it should be treated like any other <br />single - family housing in local zoning ordinances. <br />Addicks said the League of Minnesota Cities (LMC) lobbied against the legisla- <br />tion in 1981 and 1983. The results were that the legislation passed was a <br />significant improvement over earlier drafts. He reported that the LMC staff <br />had prepared an "information" bulletin in July 1982 on "manufactured homes -- . <br />notes and ordinances" which is available to local officials. He said that in <br />his opinion, the law clearly prohibited cities and counties from forcing <br />manufactured homes that are HUD certified into mobile home parks. He noted <br />that cities and counties can still regulate manufactured housing, but that such <br />regulations must be applicable to all single - family housing such as minimum <br />width, length and square footage requirements. He said ordinances that <br />establish minimum roof pitch aimed at circumventing the law and prohibiting <br />manufactured homes in a community would probably be unacceptable to the courts. <br />In conclusion, the 1982 law requires that manufactured homes be treated like <br />any other single - family homes in a community. A zoning ordinance may establish <br />a minimum house width such as 20 feet, which would have the effect of <br />eliminating single -wide manufactured houses. but only if the requirement is <br />applicable to all single - family homes in r'tat district. An ordinance may <br />require a basement or storm shelter, but only if the requirement is applicable <br />to all homes in the district. <br />ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OPINION ON MOORHEAD <br />The City of Moorhead passed a zoning ordinance amendment regulating the <br />location of manufactured homes within its jurisdiction. It specifically <br />designated certain zoning districts for manufactured homes and others where <br />manufactured homes would not be permitted. It then asked the Attorney General <br />whether the amendment was permissible in light of the 1982 amendment to <br />Minn. Stat. 462.357, subd. 1. <br />The Attorney General's opinion, issued Nov. 10, 1982, stated that the Moorhead <br />zoning ordinance amendment was not permissible. The opinion reads as follows: <br />We answer your question in the negative. In our opinion Minn. Laws 1982, <br />Ch. 490, Section 2 (Minn. Stat. Section 462.357, Subd. 1) clearly prohibits <br />24 <br />