Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-25-1988 AdditionsADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA CITY OF LITTLE CANADA REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MAY 25, 1988 1. Auto Repair License Approval Applicant: Fatemeh Rabbi Building Inspector recommends approval of license after they have complied with his letter on Page 1 See Correspondence: Pages 1 -3 2. Sofie - Petersen Addition Letter to Marcel Eibensteiner regarding unfinished work in that area. Engineer asks that no more building permits be issued until this work is completed. Completion date set at July 15, 1988, See Correspondence: Page 4 3. Additional insurance to Errors and Omissions. Insurance covers areas not covered in Errors and Omissions. See Correspondence: Pages 5 -8 Office of: JOSEPH G. CHLEBECK, Clerk 515 Little Canada Road Little Canada, Minn. 55117 484-2177 CITY OF LITTLE CANADA RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA MEMORANDUM TO: Joseph G. Chlebeck FROM: John Palacio DATE: May 24, 1988 RE: License Application at 3173 Spruce Street Inspection was conducted May 20, 1988 at 3173 Spruce. Fatemeh Rabbi is seeking a license to operate a business, auto repair /body shop, which would be located in the second half of the building. It is my understanding that no painting will be done at this location; however, if and when painting is done, the spray booth would have to meet the Uniform Fire Code fully sprinkled. Other areas of concern are: *Storage of flammable materials (There are three to seven containers on -site that contain flammable materials. Remove or provide proper listed containers for flammable materials,); *Flammable waste trap must be provided within the area; *Information provided to Pollution Control Agency, Roseville, Minnesota. There are tanks that are buried. Need a report for compliance to the Pollution Control Agency; *Extinguishers shall be size for the use within the locations; *Provide site plan on parking requirements; *Provide landscaping plan to be reviewed by the City Planner and City Council (Zoning- Parking- Storage); *Remove all debris within the property lines; *Remove dilapidated structure (garage, tires, and unoperable equipment); *Items listed are not limited. Response will be required within five days. My recommendations at this time are that the items listed are the owner's responsibility, and he should adhere to the requirements as stated in this correspondence. JP:kv cc: Mayor and City Council PAGE -1- Jacobsen, Fatemeh Rabbi c IU MAYOR Michael Fahey COUNCIL Beverly Scalze Bill Biesener Rick Conova Jim LaVane Street CITY OF LITTLE CANADA BUSINESS LICENSE APPLICATION PLEASE TYPE OR PR /NT License # Fee Receipt # 1. Name of Business iv) pa Q S L^ N ER 12 p P ( S r s 2. Address 3i (5 SpEuCP I,TTIc CANADAINj\J JJ U(J 3. Owner of Business F2 1 1 P, £ H 12 A- 13 (� 4. Owner of Building J e FFi c-y J ! d l' (0 U s -P 6 5. Type of Business A, IJ rufan,C), 7- t od./ 6. Phone #: a) Daytime /, `a(, 3 `'I LI / b) Nighttime 4 L./ W 3 2- L c) Emergency 7. Is Building Sprinkled? Yes No 8. Any Special Hazards? 9. Site Plan: Show location of gas meter, electrical service, water hydrants and hazards. Street Use reverse side if necessary Street PAGE -2- WHITE —FIRE DEPT. PINK — OFFICE CANARY— APPLICANT T N Street 1 3 31 }I 2 (c) 3167_ •� '1 4 3165` 1132. 2 0 (23) -1 1— `.. "1.1101" a151(9) PAGE -3- Marcel Eibensteiner 3490 Lexinton Avenue North Suite 100 Shoreview, MN 55126 Dear Marcel: 500 West Highway 96 St. Paul, Minnesota 55112 4843301 April 26, 1988 RE: Sofie Peterson Addition We have received complaints from the City and some home- owners in the area. 1. The seeding or sodding of the boulevards has not been completed. 2. The cap on one of thehydrants has not been replaced. I have contacted M. & M. a number of times about this item. 3. The walkways to the park area not completed. 4. The fence on each side of the walkway has not been installed. We would appreciate your cooperation in getting these items completed on or before July 15,1988. If you have any questions please feel free to call. Sincerely, MI ER W. CARLEY& ASSOCIATES, INC. Donald 0. Carley, •City Engineer cc: Little Canada DOC /mw PAGE -4- League of Minnesota Cities 183 University Ave. East St. Paul, MN 55101-2526 (612) 227-5600 (FAX: 221.0986) May 6, 1988 To: City officials and insurance agents From: League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust Re: Inverse condemnation and pollution liability coverages Member cities of the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust can now add liability coverage for certain pollution exposures and for inverse condemnation liability arising out of zoning and other land use regulations. The city can add either or both coverages, either at renewal or as a mid -term endorsement. Copies of the endorsements are attached. /POLLUTION POLLUTION COVERAGE 0.1-°7P LMCIT is now offering to member cities an endorsement which adds back coverage for certain pollution exposures, replacing the strict pollution exclusion currently used. The optional limited pollution liability endorsement gives the city coverage for property damage or bodily injury caused by a release or discharge of pollutants, where three conditions are met: 1) the release is accidental; 2) the release occurs entirely above ground; and 3) the release begins and ends within 72 hours of the accident. The endorsement also adds back coverage for liability stemming from the use of mace, tear gas, or similar substances. Obviously, this does not provide a solution to all of a city's exposures to pollution liability. Landfills and underground storage tanks are two examples of exposures that would not be covered. However, it will provide protection for things like a malfunctioning ventilation system in a city building, or an accidental spill of herbicides by park maintenance workers. The pollution coverage is subject to a $600,000 annual aggregate limit, including defense costs. The cost of adding the pollution coverage is 3.5% of the city's liability premium. .V INVERSE CONDEMNATION LIABILITY FOR LAND USE REGULATION . J'5 In a 1987 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a city could be held liable for a temporary taking of private property resulting from enforcement of a zoning ordinance or other land use regulation. This is a new liability exposure for cities; in the past, courts would bar future enforcement of an ordinance which went too far, but generally would not award damages. The PAGE -5- 1987 decision means that a city could be held liable for "rent" for the time during which an ordinance was enforced, if it were later determined that enforcing that ordinance resulted in a "taking" of the property. You may want to discuss this issue with your city attorney. If a zoning ordinance has resulted in a taking of property, the property owner's remedy is to bring an inverse condemnation suit. However, LMCIT's current liability coverage document excludes inverse condemnation. (Liability insurance policies offered to cities by commercial insurance companies almost universally contain a similar exclusion.) Because of this exclusion, some zoning claims have not been covered by LMCIT in the past - specifically those zoning - related claims based solely on a "taking" theory of law. LMCIT member cities can now add coverage for inverse condemnation suits arising out of enforcement of zoning or other land use regulations. This optional endorsement provides coverage for liability for inverse condemnation damages for the period of time during which the regulation is being enforced, up until the time that the courts determine that the regulation constitutes a "taking." The coverage is subject to a $600,000 annual limit, and a 15% "coinsurance" provision; that is, LMCIT would cover 85% of damages and defense costs, while the city would bear the remaining 15 %. The cost of adding the inverse condemnation coverage is 2.5% of the city's liability premium. It must be emphasized that this coverage applies only to regulatory takings. It does not apply to an inverse condemnation action which alleges that the city has physically occupied or used private property without paying for it. WHY ARE THERE ANNUAL LIMITS ON THESE COVERAGES? In offering the pollution and inverse condemnation coverages, LMCIT is venturing into areas in which there is little or no past experience on which to draw. Despite the risks involved, the LMCIT Board sees LMCIT's job as finding a way if at all possible to provide cities with coverage for their exposures. The lack of past loss data makes it very difficult to accurately project what the ultimate losses are likely to be or what the proper premium rate should be. Obviously LMCIT must strike a balance between meeting the individual city's need for protection on the one hand and making sure that LMCIT will remain financially strong and stable so as to be able to continue to serve cities on the other. The annual coverage limits on both coverages and the coinsurance provisions on the inverse condemnation coverage are designed to help keep that risk manageable. Also, the extended reporting period option will not apply to these coverages. Finally, because the liability coverage is claims -made, rates can be adjusted in the future to reflect the actual losses as they develop. PAGE -6- f LIMITED POLLUTION LIABILITY ENDORSEMENT In consideration of the additional premium listed below, it is agreed that Exclusion e. under Coverage A and Exclusion e. under Coverage E are amended by inclusion of subsection e. (5) as follows: (5) This exclusion does not apply with respect to 'bodily injury' or 'property damage': (a) (b) which occurred entirely above ground caused by the actual, alleged or threatened discharge, dispersal, release or escape of pollutants the result of a 'sudden occurrence' which occurred on or after the retroactive date shown below and prior to the expiration date of this covenant; or which was caused by the discharge or dispersal of mace, tear gas or similar agent which occurred on or after the retroactive date shown below and prior to the expiration of this covenant if such discharge or dispersal was for the purpose of protecting persons or property or incident to an arrest. "Sudden occurrence" means an accident which happens entirely above ground and the pollution resulting therefrom which begins and ends within seventy -two (72) hours following the accident and in the case of a related series of accidents, the 'sudden occurrence' will be deemed to have taken place when the first accident in the related series of such accidents took place. With respect to damages recoverable under this endorsement, the liability of LMCIT under this covenant for loss and Toss adjustment expenses to include legal defense costs, shall not exceed 5600,000 per occurrence and 5600,000 in the aggregate annually. With respect to coverage provided by this endorsement, the basic extended reporting period and the sup- plemental extended reporting periods under Section VI - Condition, are waived and no extended reporting period is provided. Addition Premium Endorsement Effective Date Retroactive Date 5 All other terms and conditions remain unchanged. ME043 (5/88) Authorized Signature 3.5 % of $ 15,335.00 = $ 536.73 PAGE -7- !. INVERSE CONDEMNATION EXTENSION ENDORSEMENT In consideration of the additional premium listed below, it is agreed that Exclusion d. under Coverage D, Errors or Omissions Liability, is amended to read as follows: d. To any claim for damages arising out of condemnation, inverse condemnation, adverse possession, or dedication by adverse use, but this exclusion does not apply to claims for inverse condemnation damages wherein: (1) (2) The alleged taking of private property resulted from the application of a land use, zoning, building, subdivision or similar ordinance or regulation and not from a physical occupation, invasion, or use of the property; and The alleged damage occurred on or after the retroactive date shown below but prior to a final determination by the courts that enforcement of the ordinance or regulation constitutes a taking of private property. A claim covered by this endorsement will be deemed to have been made when suit seeking damages for the wrongful taking of private property is filled against the 'city'. With respect to damages recoverable under this endorsement, the liability of LMCIT shall be limited to eighty -five (85) percent of the loss and loss adjustment expense to include legal defense costs and the total liability of LMCIT shall not exceed 3600,000 per occurrence and 5600,000 in the aggregate annually. With respect to coverage provided by this endorsement, the basic extended reporting period and the sup- plemental extended reporting periods under Section VI - Conditions, are waived and no extended reporting period is provided. Addition Premium Endorsement Effective Date Retroactive Date S All other terms and conditions remain unchanged. ME042 (5/88) Authorized Signature 2.5 % of $ 15,335.00 = $ 383.38 PAGE8