My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-24-1988 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1988
>
02-24-1988 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/12/2013 12:00:17 PM
Creation date
6/12/2013 11:57:56 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 4 <br />In increasing its gasoline tax (which has been unchanged since January 1, 1984) Minnesota would be <br />following a clear national trend which has seen eighteen states increase their gasoline taxes since <br />September 1, 1986. Among these states is Wisconsin, which in 1987 increased its tax to 20 cents per <br />gallon. We expect that a number of other states will adopt increases in 1988, including possibly Iowa <br />where the state Transportation Commission has proposed raising that state's 16 cent tax by three cents. <br />Recommendation No, 2. The share of Motor Vehicle Excise Tax revenues eoing to transportation should <br />be increased from the present 5% to 35 %t <br />As has been noted, many persons who testified before the Commission felt strongly that the excise tax <br />on motor vehicles is as much of a highway user tax as are the gasoline tax and motor vehicle license <br />taxes, and should be dedicated to highways just as those taxes are. We believe that this testimony is <br />representative of a sizeable portion of public opinion. The fact that many people believe that the MVET <br />was always dedicated to highways, and that the legislature in 1983 took it away from highways and has <br />refused to give it back, reflects not so much an erroneous view of the legislative history of MVET as a <br />deep- seated sense that an MVET dedication to highways is fair and equitable. <br />The Commission agrees with this public sense. Additional funds are needed if transportation is ever to <br />become a stimulus for economic development, and the excise tax must be an essential component of a <br />funding package. We recognize the strong feeling on the part of many members of the legislature that <br />they cannot accept an increase in the gasoline tax without a substantial increase in the share of MVET <br />going to highways. <br />We further believe that both sound policy and the necessity of public acceptance of any funding package <br />require that the present division of MVET's transportation share between highways and transit (75% to <br />highways, 25% to transit) be retained. <br />The excise tax is of particular importance as the legislature is faced with proposals to reexamine <br />highway jurisdiction in Minnesota. Because it is free of constitutional requirements for its distribution <br />among state and local governments the excise tax is the only potential highway user tax with the <br />flexibility to finance transfers of highways among jurisdictions. <br />The additional 30% transfer would increase the total share of the excise tax going to transportation to <br />35 %. The 30% figure was selected in order to keep the proposal within the realm of feasibility given the <br />focal realities facing the next legislative session and also to provide a rough parity in the total package <br />between MVET revenue and gasoline tax revenue. <br />Table I shows the anticipated revenue from the Commission's transportation financing proposal. The <br />trunk highway share will be sufficient eventually to restore all the projects deferred from the current <br />biennium's highway improvement plan and avoid more than 80% of the probable deferrals in the next <br />biennium. While this package does not go as fax as some of us would like in providing revenue for state <br />highways we feel that it is the largest highway funding package which can realistically be presented to <br />the legislature. <br />The total amount which the package will raise for statewide transit assistance over the next three <br />years is about $52.1 million, or an average of 317.4 million per year. It will be up to the legislature to <br />determine how much of this money will be used co augment present transit appropriations from tin <br />general fund and how much will be used to replace those general fund appropriations. The Commission <br />recommends that whatever this decision is, the following financing objectives should be met: <br />1. The dedication of revenue from driver license fees which was used to supplement transit <br />appropriations in the 1988-89 biennium should be repealed for fiscal 1989, and that money be <br />provided from the new MVET revenues going into the transit assistance fund (the dedication is <br />Page 63 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.