Laserfiche WebLink
Little Canada Mayor and City Council <br />Little Canada Planning Commission <br />12 June 1984 <br />Page Two <br />case, land use was not the basic case. The issue was proper protection of <br />neighboring residential uses. The second case involved the Kimmes property <br />on Little Canada Road. Again, basic use and combination of activities was <br />not the concern. The Kimmes development involved accommodating previously <br />accepted activities plus future resolution of substandard parcel sizes. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />It is our opinion that the basic issue posed by the Paimen request is the <br />acceptability of combining residential and industrial or commercial activities. <br />In general, our view is that such practice may in some, very limited cases be <br />acceptable, but in the majority of cases not be advisable. As one case sets <br />the precedent for all others, we believe the mixing of uses as exemplified in <br />this case is not advisable. <br />The Planning Commission and City Council should resolve the basic question. <br />Should there be disagreement with our office's position and action taken <br />accordingly, staff should be directed to formulate appropriate conditions <br />for the operation. <br />cc: Joseph Chlebeck <br />Tom Sweeney <br />Ed Locke <br />Don Carley <br />R.E. Paimen <br />