Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Joseph Chlebeck <br />January 24, 1984 <br />Page 3 <br />Accordingly, the Ramsey County Assessor's value is not the best source to be <br />used in determining a proper fair market value. Most new facilities are <br />financed through some type of lending company. In conjunction therewith, the <br />lender will normally require a current appraisal. The City should require a <br />copy of such appraisal or other alternative indicators of proper fair market <br />value. <br />TAX LEVY FEE - PRESENT VALUE FACTOR <br />Mr. Echtenkamp's objections to our method of computing the tax levy fee was also <br />discussed by you, myself, the City Engineer and the City Attorney. <br />Additionally, I discussed these points with Mr. Echtenkamp several weeks ago and <br />explained why we used the years and interest rates that we did. <br />His computations are in error because he is using my Equivalent 1982/1983 which <br />were based upon 29 and 19 years of tax levies and he is applying these mills for <br />14 years rather than the appropriate 29 and 19 years. If Mr. Echtenkamp wishes <br />to use 14 years as his multiplier, he should use the same number of years as his <br />divider to compute the average annual tax levy. A comparison of his computation <br />and mine (before the present value factor adjustment is made) for the Sanitary <br />Sewer System is as follows: <br />November Objection <br />Description Calculations Calculations <br />1. Total Scheduled Tax Levies $ 2,868,100 $ 2,868,100 <br />2. Total Years c 29 yrs. _ 29 yrs. <br />3. Average Annual Levy $ 98,900 $ 98,900 <br />4. 1981/1983 Amount Equivalent <br />to 1 mill r 50,241 - 50,241 <br />5. Equivalent 1982/1983 Mills 1.969 1.969 <br />6. Total Tax Years <br />7. Total Mills <br />@ 29 yrs. @ 14 yrs. <br />57.101 27.566 <br />As shown above, Mr. Echtenkamp was inconsistent in his calculations. Had he <br />divided the total scheduled tax levies by the same 14 years as his multiplier, <br />he would have ended up with 57.092 total mills instead of 27.566 total mills <br />(i.e., $2,868,100 4 14 = $204,864 _ $50,241 = 4.078 x 14 = 57.092). The .009 <br />mills difference is due to rounding. Mr. Echtenkamp made the same error in his <br />computations for the Water System. <br />