My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-11-1989 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
01-11-1989 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2014 1:48:49 PM
Creation date
6/26/2013 11:44:03 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iNUTES <br />Jity Council <br />January 27, 1982 <br />Mrs. Scalze stated that she was not in favor of automatically granting <br />the deferrments to any senior citizen requesting one. Scalze commented <br />that some seniors could be millionaires and still get deferrments. <br />Mr. Fahey suggested that a senior citizen could file an affidavit on <br />their income with the City Clerk and the Clerk could report to the <br />Council whether or not the senior mets the requirements for a deferrment. <br />In that way, the Council would not have to know the seniorb assets. <br />Fahey also stated that he did not believe the deferrments should be <br />granted solely on the basis of age, but there should be a geniune <br />hardship present in order for the deferrment to be granted. <br />Mr. Forsberg felt the deferrment policy should remain as it has <br />previously been handled. Mr. Forsberg stated that the senior citizen <br />may need his money for an illness or a nursing home. <br />Hanson stated that the City is not in that bad of a financial situation <br />that the policy could not remain as is for senior citizen deferrments. <br />Fahey suggested that the senior could just file an affidavit stating <br />that his annual payment for the assessment exceeds 2% of his adjusted <br />gross income. No figures would have to be disclosed. <br />Mrs. Scalze stated that the City could also discuss the situation of <br />a young family that could not afford its assessment. Fahey agreed <br />that there could be the situation of a young family without much <br />money and a senior citizen with a lot of money. <br />The Attorney suggested that the Council handle the situation by <br />Council resolution rather than ordinance. A resolution is easier to <br />amend and there is no publication requirement. <br />Mr. Fahey introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 82 -1 -48 - ADOPTING A SENIOR CITIZEN DEFERRED <br />ASSESSMENT POLICY AS OUTLINED IN THE CITY ATTORNEY'S LETTER <br />DATED JANUARY 21, 1982 BEGINNING WITH THE STATEMENT IN THE <br />THIRD PARAGRAPH ON PAGE TWO OF THAT LETTER: <br />^The City Council of the City of Little Canada determines <br />that deferral of special assessments for certain senior <br />citizens is in the public interest, and it is necessary <br />that the City Council establish its general policies and <br />guidelines for granting said deferrals of special assessments <br />for senior citizens; therefore, the City Council endorses <br />the principle of deferment of special assessments for certain <br />senior citizens, where the payment of said special assessments <br />would constitute a hardship; the City Council's consideration <br />of the application for granting deferments of special <br />assessments shall be based upon the following factors: <br />PAGE -27- <br />Page -11- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.