Laserfiche WebLink
FROM LPN, [11 HOFFMI tI MHOI <br />COUNTRY DRIVE REDEVELOPMENT SITE <br />June 26, 1989 <br />Page 3 <br />F. <br />The key advantage of using a redevelopment district is that it <br />provides that the duration of the district can be up to 25 years. <br />We would project that any bond issue associated with this project <br />should not exceed 15 to 17 years, as the additional funding which <br />will become available with a longer bond issue is minimal. <br />NATURE OF CITY ASSISTANCE <br />In a redevelopment district, the City most often compensates the <br />developer for the "excess cost" of acquiring properties which are <br />already developed. The City would write down the existing <br />acquisition cost to a level which is comparable with traditional <br />vacant land market values. <br />In this case, we would recommend that the land be "written <br />down" to an estimated $1.25 to $1.50 per square foot. The City's <br />Tax Increment Financing assistance would be used to pay costs over <br />and above the developer's purchase price from the City. Our <br />preliminary review of the proposed project and anticipated <br />acquisition and site development costs suggests the feasibility of <br />the City to proceed on this basis. <br />TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PROCESS <br />The Tax Increment Financing process in this case, should be <br />initiated with the Letter of Intent or understanding with the <br />developer. This will define the parameters of the project both in <br />terms of schedule, ultimate development, and level of assistance. <br />Once this Letter of Intent has been prepared and the developer has <br />met minimal performance requirements, the City can proceed with <br />the development of a Tax Increment Financing Plan. Assuming <br />that a Letter of Intent can be completed and executed within two <br />weeks, the City would be in a position to establish a Tax <br />Increment Financing District and initiate the project by <br />mid - August, 1989. <br />We would also recommend that the project be structured so that <br />the City only funds its assistance based upon the phased - <br />development plan of the developer. In other words, we would not <br />recommend advancing TIF funds over and above projected market <br />valuations of each committed phase. This will necessitate a series <br />of "closings" with the developer over a two to three year time <br />period as he initiates each phase. The principal purpose for <br />this recommendation would be to preserve the City's security in <br />the transaction. <br />Page 31 <br />