My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-23-1989 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
08-23-1989 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2014 2:24:39 PM
Creation date
6/26/2013 1:25:55 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
127
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
All parking stall sizes and drive aisle widths are found to meet <br />minimum requirements as set forth within the City Ordinance. <br />Circulation. Generally, circulation through the site appears <br />acceptable with some concerns. One note is that an easement is <br />to be secured for rear access to the building from the veterinary <br />hospital. While the shared access drive is considered a positive <br />feature of the site design, proof of the easement must be <br />provided. Should the easement not be granted, service vehicles <br />will be afforded access only via Rice Street. <br />Also of significant concern is the proposed circulation patterns <br />afforded Rapid Oil Change patrons. As shown on the submitted <br />site plan, vehicles must enter the facility from the north then <br />exit south toward the interior of the site. This one -way routing <br />of vehicles presents a number of problems. With the structure's <br />most visible facade and principal store entry facing south, it <br />would seem natural for vehicles to enter from the south and exit <br />onto the site's primary service drive which lies to the north. A <br />second concern relates to the lack of stacking space provided for <br />vehicles wishing to enter the facility from the north. It <br />appears vehicles waiting to enter the Rapid Oil Change building <br />will lie in conflict with adjacent drive aisle traffic. <br />As shown on Exhibit G, the structure could be shifted <br />approximately 11 feet to the south to eliminate the said drive <br />aisle conflicts. Additionally, a switching of traffic direction <br />through the facility could be accomplished without disrupting <br />site circulation patterns. It should be noted that the site plan <br />alternative illustrated on Exhibit G would require the relocation <br />of an adjacent light standard and the loss of one parking space. <br />According to the submitted site plan, three access points via <br />Rice Street have been proposed. This would exceed the existing <br />number of curb cuts by one. <br />While the three provided access points may generally be <br />considered excessive, specific site characteristics would seem to <br />warrant them. The northernmost access point will serve as a <br />primary entry /exit point for service vehicles, thereby allowing <br />the segregation of customer and service vehicles. In addition, <br />the one -way processing of Rapid Oil Change patrons would appear <br />conducive to duel adjacent access points. Furthermore, should <br />the proposed veterinary clinic easement fail to be granted, <br />service traffic along the route would undoubtedly intensify and <br />make the separation of truck and customer vehicles even more <br />imperative. <br />Page 48 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.