The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About10-25-1989 Council AgendaAGENDA CITY OF LITTLE CANADA REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING October 25, 1989 A. 1. Call to Order - 7:30 P.M. 2. Roll Call Mayor Mr. Michael Fahey Councilwoman Mrs. Beverly Scalze Councilman Mr. Bill Blesener Councilman Mr. Rick Collova Councilman Mr. Jim LaValle Attorney Mr. Thomas Sweeney Engineer Mr. Don Carley Planner Mr. Steve Grittman Recording Secretary Mrs. Kathleen Glanzer 3. Approval of the Minutes - October 11, 1989 Workshop Meeting October 11, 1989 Regular Meeting 4. Announcements This agenda is subject to change by additions and deletions. Page 1 AGENDA CITY COUNCIL October 11, 1989 B. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 5. Greg Campbell - Conditional Use Permit for accessory garage for storage and hobby purposes - 2881 Edgerton Street Correspondence Pages 18 through 26 Comments: Motions: 6. Terry McTeague - Conditional Use Permit for accessory garage in rear yard abutting Sylvan Street - 2565 Stark Street Correspondence Pages 27 through 34 Comments: Motions: 7. Ely Arcilla - Rear Yard Setback Variance - 641 Keller Parkway Correspondence Pages 35 through 42 Comments: Motions: Page 2 AGENDA CITY COUNCIL October 11, 1989 8. Bank Shot Billiards - Amendment to Conditional Use Permit to increase number of video games to ten - 2660 Rice Street Correspondence Pages 43 through 48 Comments: Motions: 9. Rezoning of north 135 feet of 89, 83, 77, and 73 West County Road C from B -3 (General Business) to R -1 Correspondence Pages 49 through 52 Comments: Motions: Page 3 AGENDA CITY COUNCIL October 11, 1989 C. PRESENTATIONS 10. Concept review of senior citizen housing project proposal on property adjacent to existing senior citizen building - David Wolff, Bartel Construction. Opinion pending from City Planner on proposed resolution prepared by Miller and Schroeder. Correspondence Pages 53 through 60. 11. Round Lake Trail Homeowners Association - Retaining Wall Jay McNabb, Attorney representing Association appearing. D. NEW BUSINESS - NONE E. CONSULTANT REPORTS 12. City Engineer a. Status of assessments for sewer and water improvement for 2875 Jackson Street. 13. City Attorney a. Ordinance establishing $25.00 certification charge for delinquent sanitary sewer accounts. 14. City Planner a. Overnight parking of vehicles in City -owned parking lots. Page 4 AGENDA CITY COUNCIL October 11, 1989 E. COUNCIL REPORTS 15. Economic Development - Mr. Fahey 16. Public Safety - Mr. Fahey 17. Utilities - Mr. Blesener a. Public Works Superintendent requesting to postpone purchase of utility box and substitute purchase of replacement plow. Report pending. 18. Building /Zoning - Mr. Collova 19. Parks & Recreation - Mrs. Scalze a. Tax - forfeited property on Park Street - Report pending from Park Commission. Correspondence Pages 61 through 63. 20. Administration - Mr. LaValle a. Approval of the Vouchers 21. Adjourn Page 5 CORRESPONDENCE TO THE AGENDA CITY OF LITTLE CANADA REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING October 25, 1989 PAGES CORRESPONDENCE 1 -17 Planning Commission Minutes 18 -26 Campbell Conditional Use Permit Request 27 -34 McTeague Conditional Use Permit Request 35 -42 Arcilla Rear Yard Setback Variance Request 43 -48 Bank Shot Billiards Amendment to Conditional Use Permit 49 -52 Rezoning of north 135 feet of W. County Road C properties 53 -60 Senior Citizen Housing Proposal 61 -63 Tax - Forfeited Properties on Park Street MINUTES CAMPBELL CUP FOR ACCESSORY GARAGE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING PLANNING COMMISSION LITTLE CANADA, MINNESOTA October 12, 1989 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Little Canada, Minnesota was held on the 12th day of October, 1989 in the Council Chambers of the City Center located at 515 Little Canada Road in said City. Chairman Peter Costa called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. and the following members of the Commission were present at roll call: MEMBERS PRESENT: Mr. Peter Costa, Chairman Mr. Gene DeLonais Ms. Claudia Drabik Mr. Art Herkenhoff Mr. Bob Pedersen MEMBERS ABSENT: ALSO PRESENT: Mr. Dave Bendel Ms. Peggy Schweizer Mr. Steve Grittman, City Planner Ms. Kathy Glanzer, Rec. Secretary There being no corrections to the minutes of September 14, 1989, the minutes stood approved as read. Mr. Greg Campbell, 2881 Edgerton Street, appeared before the Commission requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit so that he can construct an accessory garage on his property to be used for storage purposes and hobbies. Campbell reported that he will construct the new garage behind his existing garage and will access the proposed garage by driving through his existing garage. Campbell reported that he restores old cars as a hobby and for his own purposes and will use the new garage for this hobby as well as for additional storage area. Herkenhoff stated that there appears to be a lot of cars at the Campbell home. Page 1 MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION October 12, 1989 Campbell reported that during the summer he did have six cars, however, sold one and is restoring another. Campbell reported that he and his wife and three children live at 2881 Edgerton. Drabik asked if the car restoration was a only a hobby, and asked if Mr. Campbell would be using noisy equipment. Campbell replied that his car restoration is only a hobby and reported that he does all his own vehicle maintenance. Campbell reported that he would be using an air compressor, but no paint spraying equipment. Campbell reported that the majority of the time he would work in the garage between the hours of 3:30 P.M. and 9 P.M. Costa asked the size of the garage. Campbell replied that the garage would be 24 feet by 36 feet. Drabik stated that there is a problem in her neighborhood with noise generated by people doing vehicle maintenance. Drabik asked if the the City had a noise ordinance. The City Planner replied that the restrictions in the Zoning Ordinance refer to PCA standards for noise. Costa asked if there would be anyone else working in the garage other than Mr. Campbell. Campbell replied that there would not unless his brother helped him out on occasion. Campbell also pointed out that he will have a small sound - proofed area within the garage in which he would use noisy equipment. The City Planner reported that Code allows a maximum of 1,000 square feet in garage area, and any amount over Page 2 MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION October 12, 1989 that requires a Conditional Use Permit. The total of Campbell's existing garage and the proposed accessory garage exceeds 1,000 square feet by about 250 square feet. Drabik asked if there will be car parts stored outside. Campbell replied that there would not. Costa asked if Campbell has discussed his proposal with the neighbor that was at the last meeting objecting to it. Campbell replied that he did not. Campbell stated that he did not agree with that neighbor that his proposal would decrease property values. Campbell reported that the garage will get outside storage inside. Campbell reported that he did discuss the matter with his two neighbors who are adjacent to him, and they have no objection and offered to help construct the garage. Costa asked how deep the Campbell property is. Campbell reported that his lot is 366 feet deep. Drabik again stated that her concern was with noise. Campbell reported that the entire garage would be insulated, and there would be a 3 by 5 foot enclosure for noisy equipment. Costa pointed out that this is not to be a commercial garage. Drabik asked if Campbell would be fixing cars for resale. Campbell replied that he would not. Drabik pointed out the Planner's recommendation that the garage match the exterior of the house. The City Planner reported that the Building Inspector will review the plans for the garage to ensure that the exterior matches the house. Herkenhoff stated that he did not want to see residential areas becoming commercial. Page 3 MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION October 12, 1989 Campbell replied that it was not his intention to have a commercial operation. Mr. DeLonais recommended approval of the Conditional Use Permit for accessory garage as requested by Mr. Greg Campbell, 2881 Edgerton, subject to the recommendations of the City Planner as contained in his report dated September 12, 1989. Motion seconded by Drabik. Motion carried 5 - 0. Campbell asked how long the permit was valid in the event that he could not begin constructing the garage until spring. The Planner replied that the permit is valid for one year, and Mr. Campbell can request an extension of the permit, if necessary. MCTEAGUE Mr. Terry McTeague, 2565 Stark Street, appeared before CUP FOR the Commission requesting approval of a Conditional Use ACCESSORY Permit for an accessory garage. McTeague pointed out GARAGE that he has a double- fronting lot and while his home and existing garage front on Stark Street, he is proposing to construct an accessory garage fronting on Sylvan. The garage would be used for storage and to park his son's car. McTeague was concerned with the recommendation of the City Planner stating that Sylvan Street should not be used for access unless the property is assessed for the Sylvan Street improvement. Drabik asked the size garage proposed. McTeague replied that he is planning a 24 foot by 30 foot garage. Pedersen was concerned about the appearance of the garage on a lot adjacent to lots that are developed with homes and garages. Costa asked if the McTeague property was splitable. McTeague replied that the property could not be divided without a variance. The City Planner reported that the total property area is about 19,000 square feet, and City Code requires a Page 4 MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION October 12, 1989 minimum of 10,000 square feet for residential lots. McTeague reported that the City granted the property a variance for lot width when he first bought the property 12 years ago. McTeague reported that at the time Sylvan Street was improved, the City deferred the assessments for the street until such time as the lot might be divided. McTeague pointed out that the lot could not be divided without a variance. Drabik pointed out that by constructing a garage on Sylvan Street, McTeague would be using the street just like other property owners along it. Drabik felt it would not be fair not to assess the property for Sylvan Street in the event that the street is being used. Mrs. McTeague pointed out that other property owners along Sylvan Street are also using sewer and water, while they would not be. Drabik asked if the assessments could be broken down, and the McTeague property only assessed for the street portion of the improvement. The Planner replied that that is a possibility. Costa asked if the garage could be accessed from Stark Street. McTeague replied that it could not since the yard is terraced and there is quite an elevation change. The City Planner stated that he is concerned about a precedent being set in allowing Sylvan Street to be used but not assessing for the cost of the street. McTeague pointed out that his son would be the only one using the street, and felt that the rational being used would justify a two -car family being assessed double for street access. The Planner reported that through lots are now allowed on new plats just because of the problems being discussed tonight. Mrs. McTeague pointed out that the property still has access to Sylvan Street even if a garage is not constructed. Page 5 MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION October 12, 1989 Mr. McTeague pointed out that he pays higher property taxes just because of the amount of land he has. Mr. Schorn, property owner in the area, pointed out that the Zoning Code only allows one driveway per lot. McTeague asked if he could construct a car port on the property without need for a Conditional Use Permit. The Planner replied that he could, however, the issue of the second driveway would still exist. The Planner stated that he has nothing against the garage being proposed, the issue is the City's assessment policy. The Planner stated that the garage would probably fill a hole on the facade of the street, but how could the City rationalize abating the assessments for the street on this lot and then allowing access to the street. The Planner pointed out that the garage could be constructed, and sometime in the future Mr. and Mrs. McTeague could sell the property and a home could be constructed on Sylvan. McTeague reported that his assessments were not waived, but deferred until such time as the lot is split. There is interest accruing on the assessment. The Planner stated that the City Council will have to review its assessment policy. If a Conditional Use Permit is granted, the property owner is allowed access to the street. The Planner stated that he has discussed the issue with the City Attorney, who indicated that the City has the authority to levy the assessment against the property. DeLonais pointed out that it is the Council's job to review its assessment policy. Drabik agreed, pointing out that the issue for the Commission is the garage itself. The Planner stated that if the Commission felt the garage appropriate in the location proposed, it could recommend approval subject to Council review of the assessment issue. Mr. Herkenhoff recommended approval of the Conditional Use Permit requested by Mr. Terry McTeague, 2565 Stark Street, to construct an accessory garage on Sylvan Street subject to the recommendations of the City Page 6 MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION October 12, 1989 Planner and subject to Council review of the assessment issue. Motion seconded by DeLonais. Motion carried 5 - 0. ARCILLA Mr. Ely Arcilla appeared before the Commission VARIANCE requesting a rear yard setback variance in order to construct a home at 641 Keller Parkway with a 10 foot rear yard setback. The City Planner reported that the actual setback of the closest point of the home would be 16 feet from the rear property line. The deck proposed is an acceptable encroachment in the required rear yard. The Planner pointed out that the rear yard of the lot abutts the side yard of Lot 10. The required side yard setback is 10 feet. Costa asked the size of the home proposed by Mr. Arcilla. Arcilla replied that the home would be 3,000 square feet in size. Mr. Al Graf, owner of Lot 10, stated that he opposed the variance request and felt that if the ordinance requires a 30 foot rear yard setback, that is what the setback should be. Graf passed out a diagram showing the area and the location of his home. Mr. Lepsche, Lakeside Court, stated that he opposed the variance as well. Drabik pointed out that the Arcilla home would not be adjacent to the Graf home, but rather adjacent to the rear portion of the Graf backyard. Mr. Dean Hedlund, property owner in the area, stated that the problem is that the house is too large for the lot. Hedlund stated that Mr. Arcilla chose a house plan that does not fit his lot and he is not asking his neighbors to accept a variance. Arcilla reported that he is proposing to construct a Page 7 MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION October 12, 1989 6- bedroom home. Arcilla reported that he currently has a 6- bedroom home and feels that if he is to construct a new home, he should improve upon what he now has. Drabik stated that Arcilia should have made sure that the home he wished to build would fit on the lot prior to purchasing the property. Arcilla stated that the problem is not the size of the lot, but rather its odd shape. Hedlund stated that the solution to the problem is to design a house that fits on the lot. Hedlund pointed out that the lot adjacent to Mr. Arcilla's lot is vacant and a corner lot. Hedlund was concerned that a precedent will be set in whatever is done for Mr. Arcilla. The City Planner pointed out that the Ordinance provides for a variance for shallow lots. Hedlund stated that a 4,000 square foot house could be designed for the Arcilla lot without need for a variance. Graf again stated that he was opposed to the variance as did Mr. Lepsche and Mr. Hedlund. Graf stated that he did not want a home that close to his backyard, and did not feel a variance was warranted just to accommodate the style home Mr. Arcilla wishes to construct. Pedersen asked if Graf was concerned about the setback or his view to the lake. Graf replied that he was not concerned about the view, he did not want a home that close to him. Graf stated that the ordinance was established to prevent homes from being constructed on top of one another. Hedlund again stated that Arcilia chose a house plan that does not fit his lot and felt it unreasonable to expect the neighbors to accept a variance. Arcilla was asked if he would be willing to change the style of the home proposed. Page 8 MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION October 12, 1989 Arcilla again stated that he wanted to improve on what he currently has and stated that the plan proposed is the one that he prefers. Arcilla stated that he spent a lot of time working on this plan. Pedersen asked if the property was purchased subject to a building permit being issued. Arcilla replied that this was not the case, that he owned the lot. Mr. George Warren, Lakeside Court, stated that he opposed the variance. Mrs. Lepsche stated that she was opposed to the variance since she felt a precedent would be set. Arcilla again stated that it is the shape of the lot that is the problem and the house plan selected is the one he prefers. Drabik stated that the type of house plan Mr. Arcilla prefers is not the Commission's concern. The problem is that the neighbors are opposed to the variance, and it is possible to construct a home on the lot that would conform to setbacks. Arcilla stated that he believes his request meets the conditions as outlined in the City Planner's letter. DeLonais pointed out that the Commission is a recommending body, and final decision will be made by the City Council. DeLonais pointed out that the neighbors have complied with setback requirements. DeLonais felt that Arcilla should have investigated the situation prior to purchasing the lot. Costa felt that Mr. Arcilla could have an architect modify the house plan so that it would fit on the lot. Ms. Drabik recommended that the variance request of Mr. Ely Arcilla to construct a home at 641 Keller Parkway with a 10 foot rear yard setback be denied due to the objections of the neighbors and since the property appears to be large enough for a home to be constructed on it that will conform to setback requirements. Motion seconded by Mr. Herkenhoff. Motion carried 4 - 1. Mr. Pedersen voting against. Page 9 MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION October 12, 1989 AMENDMENT TO CUP TO INCREASE NUMBER OF VIDEO GAMES Mr. Michael Schifsky, representing Bank Shot Billiards, appeared before the Commission requesting an amendment to his Conditional Use Permit to increase the number of video games to 10. Schifsky reported that he planned to remove an office area for additional space for the video games. Schifsky reported that the office space is not used and is not needed. Schifsky reported that the purpose of increasing the number of video games is to provide entertainment to adult customers while they are waiting for tables. Initially, the thought was that the games would be used by children, however, it is adults using the games. Costa asked if there was anyone from the general public present wishing to comment on this request. There was not. Herkenhoff asked if there have been any problems at the business. Schifsky reported that there have been no problems, and his operation is being used as a roll model for other billiard halls in the Metro area. Bill Suchy, County Road C resident, stated that there have been some fights in the parking lot of the center. Schifsky reported that the Sheriff's Department has not brought this to his attention and he is in contact with them on a day -to -day basis. Suchy stated that the church across the street had a meeting on the matter. Schifsky reported that the pastor of the church has visited the billiard hall and commented on what a nice facility it was and a place that helps keep younger people off the street. Schifsky reported that any problems that have occurred in the parking lot have not been serious enough that they could not be handled by the Bank Shot Billiard staff. Herkenhoff asked if there were any restraints the City could enforce should there be problems at the billiard hall. Page 10 MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION October 12, 1989 Pedersen reported that the issue this evening is the additional video games and not the entire operation. Herkenhoff stated that his concern was with problems at the billiard hall, although he has not heard of any. Mr. DeLonais recommended approval of the amendment to Conditional Use Permit to increase the number of video games allowed at Bank Shot Billiards to ten. Motion seconded by Mr. Pedersen. Motion carried 5 - 0. REZONING The City Planner reported that the Council has COUNTY ROAD initiated action to consider the rezoning of the back C PROPERTY 135 feet of 89, 83, 77 and 73 County Road C from B-3 to R -1. The Planner pointed out that these lots will front on the new Boosalis residential street. This rezoning would result in only single - family property fronting on the new street. Mr. Don Pierce, representing his mother at 77 W. County Road C, opposed the rezoning and felt it would be a downgrading of the property value. Mr. Bill Suchy, 73 W. County Road C, stated that he would prefer to have his entire lot rezoned to R -1 and felt this would ensure a nicer residential area for the existing homes on County Road C. Nick Boosalis, developer of the Rice at C Center and the proposed residential road, described the road location pointing out that the proposal has been amended moving the road location as it comes in from County Road C between the Krienke clinic and the home at 89 W. County Road C. The existing pond in the area will be reconfigured to allow the road relocation. Pierce reported that there is an existing garage on his mother's property at about the 135 foot point suggested for the rezoning. Pierce also reported that Mr. Kukk at 83 W. County Road C conducts a business on his property. Pierce was concerned about the effect of the rezoning on existing commercial uses of the property. The City Planner stated that according to his information there are no buildings at the 135 foot point. Page 11 MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION October 12, 1989 Pierce disagreed. The Planner pointed out that the development of the second shopping center was held to the requirement that the area behind the center be developed as R -1. The Planner stated that in order to make a viable single - family neighborhood, the new road should only serve single - family property and not commercial. Therefore, the purpose of the rezoning being considered this evening is to ensure that single - family homes are developed on the new street and not commercial. However, the existing uses of the property would be grandfathered in. Pedersen asked how deep the lots were. The Planner replied that the lots are 360 feet deep from the property line. Pierce suggested that there should be a buffer zone between the B -3 property and the R -1. The Planner replied that there is not adequate area for a buffer zone, and buffer zones typically do not face each other, but occur at back lot lines. Pierce was concerned that these problems are being addressed after the Boosalis development has been approved. Herkenhoff asked who will pay the assessments for the street. The City Planner replied that the lots fronting on the street will pay the assessments. Pierce reported that the property owners have been informed that the assessment for the street will be approximately $13,000 to $14,000 per lot. Pierce pointed out that if the lots can be sold for $20,000, that will only result in a profit of $6,000 for the property owner. Pierce also pointed out that the property owner is loosing half of a B -3 lot as well. Dr. Krienke, owner of 89 W. County Road C, reported that when he purchased the property as an investment, it was zoned commercial. Now the City wants to downgrade the zoning to residential, which downgrades Page 12 MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION October 12, 1989 his investment. Krienke felt the problem was with the Steneroden property and getting that strip developed. Krienke felt that rather than develop the Steneroden property as residential, there should be a denser zoning of the Steneroden property, which would still provide a buffer zone for the Iona Lane property. Krienke felt there should be a buffer zone between the B -3 property and the R -1, and that the buffer should occur on the Steneroden property. Krienke reported that he was in favor of the back 135 feet of the County Road C properties remaining B -3. Suchy again stated that he would rather his entire parcel be rezoned to R -1 to make a better residential neighborhood. Pierce stated that he would like to see the property remain B -3. Suchy indicated that Mr. Kukk at 83 W. County Road C would rather his property remain B -3. Pierce stated that the rezoning would downgrade the value of the property, plus the assessment for the street on the back 135 feet would force the property owner to sell the back lot for little or no profit. Krienke did not feel that County Road C could be considered as a nice, residential area. Boosalis reported that when the second phase of the retail center was proposed, the Council requested a master plan for the development of the back property, including the Steneroden property. Boosalis reported that he proposed medium - density housing, however, the Iona Lane neighborhood came in force opposing that proposal. Iona Lane indicated that they wanted to see the area developed as single - family residential, and that is proposal that Boosalis came back with. Boosalis questioned Pierce's position at this time supporting commercial zoning across the street from R -1. Boosalis pointed out that it took 18 months to develop the plan, and now there are a few property owners again opposing it. Boosalis reported that a great deal of time was taken trying to develop a plan that would work for everyone and one that was the best solution. Boosalis felt that the back 135 feet of the County Road Page 13 MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION October 12, 1989 C properties should be rezoned residential in order to create a nice residential neighborhood. Boosalis stated that County Road C is a commercial street, rather than a residential neighborhood. Pierce felt that the existing B -3 property that will abutt the residential street should not be rezoned to conform to Mr. Boosalis's development. Boosalis replied that this was not his development, but a proposal that was negotiated with the City and the Iona Lane residents. Pierce felt that the County Road C properties not owned by Mr. Boosalis should have been omitted from his drawings. DeLonais asked if the issue of the B -3 lots abutting the residential street was ever discussed by the Planning Commission. The City Planner replied that the issue was discussed. Pedersen asked if Tax Increment Financing could be used to reduce the cost of the assessments for the road. The City Planner replied that TIF is already being used and resulted in decreasing the assessments to approximately $13,000 per lot. TIF will be used from both the commercial and residential portion of the development. The Planner noted that the project is a very expensive one since there is a large portion of the street which is not assessable. Krienke again suggested that a buffer zone exist on the Steneroden property. The Planner noted that in typical land use planning it is possible to screen along rear lot lines, but not possible to screen commercial property fronting on a street directly across from residential property. Therefore, land use changes usually occur on rear lot lines. Pedersen asked if there were any other options that could be looked at to reduce costs to the property owners. The City Planner replied that in addition to the TIF Page 14 MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION October 12, 1989 assistance, the City is picking up interest costs. The Planner did not believe the project could be stretched any more. Krienke felt that the B -3 property was worth $5.00 per square foot, and felt that this is what the County Road C property owners should be able to get for their property. Krienke estimated the value of the County Road C lots at $50,000 each. Boosalis pointed out that the front portion of the lots would remain commercial, and there would be enough land area remaining so that commercial development could occur on these lots. Boosalis estimated the value of B -3 property at between $3 and $4 per square foot. Boosalis pointed out that the portion of the B -3 property that is valuable is that portion in the front along County Road C. Boosalis felt that the back portion did not have the same value and only added to the cost for a developer. The City Planner pointed out that the City is proposing to leave a depth of 215 feet of B -3 property along County Road C. The Planner pointed out that retail strip centers need frontage rather than depth. Pierce pointed out that there are other possibilities for development of the site other than retail. The Planner agreed, but felt adequate depth was left so that lots could be combined and developed commercially. Krienke stated that commercial developments need adequate parking area, and felt that the back portions of these lots could be used for this purpose. Krienke again stated that the County Road C property should be commercial and a buffer use should occur on the Steneroden property. Pierce replied that that issue has already been explored. Krienke again expressed concern with the little return the property owners will get from the sale of the back portion of their lots as residential, when he believed the property to be worth $5 per square foot. Krienke felt that the development of the area should have a higher density than single - family. Page 15 MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION October 12, 1989 Pierce pointed out that the area is surrounded with high density development, and the decision has already been made to develop single - family homes behind the commercial center. The only issue being considered this evening is the rezoning of the back portion of the County Road C properties. Pierce pointed out that the property owners have stated their positions, believing that the rezoning would down value their property. The density issue has already been resolved. Krienke asked about road assessments if the property remained commercial. The Planner replied the lots would still be assessed for the road if they remained commercial, with the amount of the assessment being the same since the assessment was calculated on a per lot basis. However, if the lots were assessed, the City could not deny access to the road by the commercial lots, since the assessment would mean that the City is assuming that the property benefits by the road. Boosalis pointed out that in order to get the assessments down to $13,000 per lot, a certain build -out rate is necessary for the residential area. Boosalis suggested that if there is B -3 property abutting the residential street, the build -out rate for that street will be greated reduced. Boosalis again pointed out that he would have been happy to construct just the commercial portion of the development, however, the City Council required that the back portion of the property be developed as well and it was the Iona Lane residents who said no to multi - family housing in that area. Pierce stated that he was opposed to the rezoning at this time. Krienke was also opposed. Boosalis again stated that not to rezone will slow the increment down and adversely effect the project. Mr. DeLonais recommended that the rezoning of 89, 83, 77, and 73 West County Road C from B -3 to R -1 be denied due to the opposition of three of the four property owners to the rezoning at this time. Motion seconded by Costa. Page 16 MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION October 12, 19 &9 Motion carried 3 - 0, with Pedersen and Herkenhoff abstaining. ADJOURN There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:50 P.M. Respectfully ubmitted, i K thy G :n2er e Recordi g Secretary Page 17 1 Little Canada, Minnesota APPLICATION FORM Ri. rests N° 482 tCi . cx) PAID ^7 Rec. No 22 lL Comprehensive Plan Amendment Conditional Use Permit — S 100 , co Zoning District Amendment Variance Text Amendment Subdivision Other Planned Unit Development Plan Review Applicant CAMPS lit -- ass ErnErara Li-g2- — 19 70 (Name) (Address) (Phone) Owner 6r<-CGOicY ,4 3- bECogE5 4. dAMP8(LL flS/ E05ca -roM tQ) -1970 (Name) (Address) (Phone) Property Location (Street Address and Legal Description): e;_d'81 E //�,j Cam, -o.v Sr. Si c. s /Taws a-9 k4N5 4A/5G . - Sk �T. To Sr; T rz t$ go rr, of N „l -4322 A i11 FA or 6 go r'r, oc W 1/z o S6c C TN et9 RAI as . Description and /or Reason for Request (Cite Ordinance Sections): a CA I L o 4 n D/ T r o nl ft t.-- CAA R ,, T, ct) cArc o q f o 2 5'ji0 a- 0-1 r gUG3 ti 0 oi,„ 49,5,9 op In signing this application, I hereby acknowledge that 1 have read and fully understand the applicable provisions of the Zon- ing and Subdivision Ordinances and current administrative procedures. I further acknowledge the fee explanation as outlined in the application procedures and hereby agree to pay all statements received from the City pertaining to additional applica- tion expense. (Slgnatur of £ pplicant) WHITE— Office CANARY — Customer PINK —File GO LD—Planner Pape 18 Office of: JOSEPH G, CHLEBECK, Clerk 515 Little Canada Road Little Canada, Minn. 55117 484 -2177 PROPOSAL: CITY OF LITTLE CANADA RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN ACCESSORY BUILDING FOR STORAGE PURPOSES AND HOBBIES. LOCATION: 2881 EDGERTON STREET PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: MAYOR Michael Fahey COUNCIL Beverly Scalia BiII Bie,oner Rick Collova Jim LaValle SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 29, RANGE 22, SUBJECT TO STREET; THE SOUTH 90 FEET OF THE NORTH 2944.41 FEET OF THE EAST 400 FEET OF THE WEST ONE —HALF OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 29, RANGE 22. APPLICANT: GREGORY A. & DELORES A. CAMPBELL PLANNING COMMISSION; CITY COUNCIL: THE LITTLE CANADA PLANNING COMMISSION WILL BE REVIEWING THIS MATTER AT THEIR SEPTEMBER 14, 1989 MEETING. THE MEETING BEGINS AT 7:30 P.M. AND IS HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS LOCATED AT 515 LITTLE CANADA ROAD. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 27, 1989 AT 7:30 P.M., OR AS SOON AS PARTIES MAY BE HEARD, IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF THE CITY CENTER LOCATED AT 515 LITTLE CANADA ROAD. ALL PERSONS WITH REFERENCE TO THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD DURING THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ON SEPTEMBER 14, 1989 AND THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON SEPTEMBER 27, 1989. ANNETTE FREEMAN DEPUTY CLERK Page 19 Flo St00 7Z ZZ 6Z SO r N f.. CO ED- rt ri rt In N• (0 < n 7 L w a• 1-1 cn W 1�'• 0 • (D (0 m m rt 9£00 7Z ZZ 6Z SO r N `F 0 r iN n N. W • In rt H. W N rt CO r N t0 r I-' D'a rt (D m C (D C m N 077• D' w am m 011 . O'O F aa• W w m m w a 0 m w rh F z y rt 341 '1 01 (.31 9 v, r r• F' r-• ID ■3 -4 -4 J 0 r N n rt 1O w N rt i Pi (0 C N 00) a a P. In F 0•cH 0 w r r o (D o r N n r w rt i--' H N rt N r 1/40 H (D Cr N w (D NJ CD 0 w P.W act 0 w 0 O r N c O COI x 0 r N W O r '- O r N r 0 r (n 4 In 14- m 0 N a VI pl (It 144 Co . VI P. m c< O 01 K on W 11 N rt to a N 0 J 7 N 7 N O N rt In . N 0 O N 0 01 O N (t 0 rl• Ul 11 044 m e ° a W� a 0 m< ro m c° ° m< m a 7 • N a N N 0 N a m (" 0 N (V IIE n 7 0 • N [] O m N (1 7 W N E 03 N n 7 rt N n aa• X0 a ID, m aa0 as ID hl -W+ 0 H ro w m 0 0) w 7 m r1 w 7 (D CD 7 O G) w 7 m P. a 7' -' a �S m -� a h h a (1 G -' a `< -a acrm w 3-'- acro ao•r• a0•m 0. 01 o a H . 0 0 7' 9 11 0 a H. 7 O 0) 3- 0 o a r. (1 0 a 0 o • m m 0 (•t < r o • m 0 • m o - m v 0 • a '1 a w m m o tlJ o [7 0 7 a a z o 0 < z a m z 0 -4 z a I° z 7 Z In F9.. 01 r (n IT VI Li la VI 01 01 t 01 7 j a -3 _' J J J w` 7 J -4 F+ N J n rt 10 D' 0 H. W (D 4 • 0 ti N rt CO ri 7 rd 1'4 IO r `1 4 0 00 rt N m CO kr r m r `" 0 (0° D 7C 7• W r-' 7 ri w J w Cr W w rt ti Inn `< 0 W G 7 t. 0 • o < (-'1 n w 4-- (D a In m 1.41 ri V 8Z00 Z7 ZZ 6Z SO r as 0 O r or, .'tl O r o1 2 0 r N x H. '-'7• (I1 1 - • • 0 0 to H- O O 01 N' Co (D rt F(() rt O1 17 ft O CO rt (n n rt 11 N rt (D N et m N (t co a r rr-' (o r r 1-1 IL) r r (1 co r a (D w m (D In 0 (D a 0 (D (31 7 bym N 0' N W N a Di ri N an O W N w 0 4 N N 0 N fri 7 m is 7 (D p1 p1 7 N m a 7 (I pWp�� a. Pd4 N a W ra't N Cu ro 7 N r. o rt w app,, 0 Cu • 7' o a s 1, 0 a 7 Cr • 7 0 •• .< 0 r 0 'P1+ Z0 < ro Co a (D a 3 a X Z m Z 0 Z z (n r1 (n 9 v1 (n G In 0 (n H 01 lr co '-• 7 Iq h~-' a J J -4 m m '1 DI Page 20 r N C'> H. QO w rt > rt 1n 0 > r r • a D > n 00 a11 0 rt `< N 0 O > zrta In 01 ✓ r-. V 0 01 IT00 7Z ZZ 6Z H. 1/40 w rt 0 rt W N 0 D (x1 a a 0 00 w O 9 7N rt O. W p H • CO 0 n • to In r• V eddez a]ine7 ZT00 7Z ZZ 6Z 50 rN x1 H. m0 rt '.D Co !1 VD fD H 000 7 w • rt tri a 0 0 w 7 0• vrwt rt µ In r7 14 v 0 se H. N r CO N rt Co 0 w N t'i 0000 d N N p r1 .. t • w n o 7 n o H • to WS rt r. C • m n 00 8E00 £I ZZ 6Z 50 C-4 � w rt r-• rt H a •c 0 o0 0 w 0 0 0 11 w. 0 r1 z r 9 • r• In `C V • PO tP N O O 01 H. J� o ND ft n y O < n< CO Irt- r (D (N) rt co 0 N M FI N rt J 7 o I-+ go N n O La hl rt tN O C1' N ▪ ~ 2 N • 7 0 M ID 013 w � ' R. 02 0. ^ ntOO • N nW H a .0 o 01 0 °o a 0 g -.• a 0 N o a o 0 D 0 voi a K 0 < oo rc 0 P1 0 W 7 j � rW 01 C1 0 r• 01 N rt r co ~ • • Q. J J ID a J n U1 N a..• p C N et 0 (D F rt p 7 y R. 02 J 7 01 O 0' D • `�"n.< 01 7 J ▪ 0 x r• 8000 Z6 ZZ 6Z SO r•-• Dv r. rt W 0• 0 01 0 SRo 4 a 0 a z rt 04 ro b J 01.00 Zb ZZ 6Z SO o r N rd v, o w rt• N rt ON N (0 7 1•• N 70 Cr) 0.) CO N n W w 177 rt PI r W a 0. 0 O o w 7 rt W CO ✓ 3 rt L000- L£-ZZ -6Z -S0 ✓ N0 r' CO rc CO N Hi 0 n � 0 O 4e rt Do W 00 0 Z • co n ▪ 0 • b -4 1. 0 ✓ H r N 7 n 0 01 frrf V�Oi loll b. w o loll H W No fD 1rc" o a- N rt 7 N frch CO 7 rt L71 rc tD 2to „ '0 fD t to • ~ ' y a N wn O• . N n 0 OD 4o N n tq N 0 w. 7 n a 0 m °i bn a p. 01 7 rot N a °• N a o r0j '' a n y <. 0 . 0 o w 0 1q 0 W Cr h 3 p t. 3 a o ° N 7 Z Z J 3 N 3 K o • 9 z Z • a 01 M -a J ▪ tD 0 rc J --J J -4 Page 21 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: RE: FILE NO: northwest associated consultants, inc. Little Canada Planning Commission Stephen Grittman 12 September 1989 Little Canada - Campbell Garage CUP 758.09 - 89.52 BACKGROUND Mr. Greg Campbell has applied for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a second garage on his property at 2881 Edgerton. The property is zoned R -1 and is located just north of LaBore Road. There is currently a single family house on the property with an attached two car garage. The proposed structure is to be located just behind the existing attached garage and would be 24 x 36 feet, 864 square feet in area. ANALYSIS A conditional use permit is required for a second accessory building pursuant to Section 903.020.D.5., where it states that no building permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one (1) detached or attached private garage for each single family dwelling, except by conditional use permit. This proposed building is actually the first detached garage, therefore, making it a second garage or accessory building which requires a CUP. It should be noted that the CUP request is for a private garage and not for commercial use. Commercial uses are not permitted in R -1 zones. The building must meet all lot requirements as outlined in Section 903.020.D.3 where it states that accessory buildings shall not exceed 15 feet in height, shall be six (6) feet or more from any other building or structure on the same lot and shall not be located within a public drainage, utility, or access easement. In no case shall an accessory building, use or equipment be located closer than ten (10) feet to a rear yard or side yard lot line. As shown on the site plan submitted, the accessory building meets all requirements outlined per Ordinance. Page 22 4601 excelsior blvd., ste. 410, minneapolis, mn 55416 (612) 925 -9420 fax 925 -2721 RECOMMENDATION Based on the above review, our office recommends approval of the conditional use permit to allow a second accessory building to be used for hobby or residential storage contingent upon the following: 1. The garage is used strictly for accessory purposes and that a commercial use is not permi 2. The exterior of the building is similar to structure's exterior. residential tted. the principal 3. The storage of cars or equipment outside of the accessory building is not allowed, except as otherwise allowed by Ordinance, 4. Subject to the comments of the City Attorney, City Engineer, City Building Official and City staff. cc: Kathy Glanzer Tom Sweeney John Palacio Don Carley Greg Campbell Page 23 Phis map is for planning purposes only and should not tie used when precise measurement Is required. northwest associated consultants, inc. Page 24 V L . o St: 2. .c5ep r :�, (7..t I 0C. 142° -1(5441 .04 ac tT AVl lc; ALLEN 2992 2 ,'29 .0460 2985 �) t ") ? z -16;4 4) 1 a911 615) 21 72. 3 :H 2979 (4) -Ib ..4 .844e. 29&o 4 `Ll 2965 (s) - 1754 .64 ac :4J) 29Bo ('1834) 26') 2985 Ile 4 (64 3 650 L.. 4. 2 ue.ci ;14(50); N 1 1 �9 79 u» I 114.53 ZS ?a: 114.2) r +i2(84l a 29634 2 29 50 5 ;tt) 8 2940 6 (2 (-2054.41) 4 1.2Gac r- 0 g 29 51 7 20491) 2940 i GN o I26e< 2941 . 4 2.4 0 84 354.41) 1.29 ac • 2.9H6 bay. IS.26 392.9 (•L234) .666c 0 °- ?'14-I0 (4'1 ILO .1; R9 Cps )c 2947 17..o p5 8 19430 941 ?o> 2923 o .86.0c. ° o a9 2-o 5 ° r•:4s „_ -___ {all.,_ .04 4c 60) 14 Q? 2912 10 2915 I -2554 411 .84ac (a) 29 03 �4) c ", 2902 11 g (-2654.0 1 25,1 1346c 2899 20•94 12 Qs) (2) 81 z7sa4 _ 84 a: 2887 ;.00 4111. ('jo oy $ X29544I) L5 08 2872 13 04) .86 ac &c 2914 .86.00 2°10 6 .$6 ac o (3) - • acjo(7 rr►►o-- b� `Me firs O 28 H . 86ec - fr o " °ZSao �i5o 5 gip? .47ac 0 2870> 0`l 3444 2858 " (or? ( -2(.54) 72. C• 27 54) tro c-7654) - 1 9 (a) 12(34) 2915 L.1.. 13 2909 14(x) 2901 150.9' 2 889 .a 4%7o 14 9444 '1292° It 1.43 5(sl)X 2915 127.40 4- (so) 2909 45.1* 3 be) 2901 • 02 08) a 2989 Is .4c 2866 is 0.- (•305-441) .84 a< 2$61 CM T ci2) 01 (•2954). -( V 94' (5 62ac 613 CSI 1 46N0 1O� • Page 25 Arrncoc) 1/4_54 tci‘sr 7 u'x ao' r 1 C.!!C7 4 -ro R F_ L o f k ru w' cp.!ovr; J Page 26 Q(C-F,G CI- raPIPyr 1. egg'I terit ro,/ /I rnLr C/1w /ar %/I� Sr, r Little Canada, Minnesota APPLICATION FORM N? 483 PAID 100'- Rec. No Comprehensive Plan Amendment Conditional Use Permit Zoning District Amendment Variance Text Amendment Subdivision Other Planned Unit Development Plan Review Applicant�P' -t (Name)' Owner 4/h8._ (Name) c-FriAti UE (Address) (Phone) Property Location (Street Address and Legal Description): (Address) Y13$5 ,_Srg ,c/e sr If - /ors / QQxeef6 -Hte /Jo 72,3r !eel 841 $tOe'- /z // A ,do,er/r /ie /6 /-/ rs' / 1 / / 4 / 7 ec 76 (see a #w c• A el J rt ec Description and /or Reason for Request (Cite Ordinance Sections): Vau/c /J tin ro eevsrg 4r (Phone) 60 /e a// /71 Le-Es // .7n/ Ran, s e C/na/7 / G��‘ccp��p,OP cde/ ///G- Jr/L ✓/',v ir/F£ r . ./9.6944-f StT39fre w GrJDU Z v $f .SR4nft /l-s , b 2-Ate ,v r- /61 fie, er /fS G,4fl 6 l�Jtf- Ui /rff O FOO r F,PO,n 5 /,D f .e/wry t /,vet , USED 7-9,4 iiee77476,eft £ r� sr/tee' . (see c7M<ac2/Neq z/ In signing this application, I hereby acknowledge that I have read and fully understand the applicable provisions of the Zon- ing and Subdivision Ordinances and current administrative procedures. I further acknowledge the fee explanation as outlined in the application procedures and hereby agree to pay all statements received from the City pertaining to additional applica- tion expense. Page 27 • (Signature of Applica ft (Date) WHITE—Office CANARY— Customer PINK —File GOLD — Planner AMENDED NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PROPOSAL: Application for Conditional Use Permit to construct an accessory garage. LOCATION: 2565 Stark Street PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Lots 1 through 10, inclusive, except the North 72.35 feet and all of Lots 11 and 48, Block 11, North Heights Ramsey County, Minnesota. APPLICANT: Terry McTeague PLANNING COMMISSION: CITY COUNCIL: The Little Canada Planning Commission will be reviewing this matter at their October 12, 1989 meeting. The meeting starts at 7:30 P.M. and is held in the Council Chambers of the City Center located at 515 Little Canada Road. Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held by the City Council on Wednesday, October 25, 1989 at 7:30 P.M., or as soon thereafter as parties may be heard, in the Council Chambers of the City Center located at 515 Little Canada Road. All persons with reference to this matter will be heard during the Planning Commission meeting on October 12, 1989 and the City Council meeting on October 25, 1989. Annette Freeman Deputy Clerk Page 28 JcURCJ a C.lCr1Ci' Gustafson 2686 Sylvan Street Little Canada, NW 55117 07- 29 -22 -21 -0121 Randall & Janice Graczyk 2565 Sylvan Street Little Canada, MW 55117 07- 29 -22 -21 -0122 Michael & Susan Degal 2535 Sylvan Street Little Canada, MW 55117 07- 29 -22 -21 -0119 Dennis & Elizabeth Davison 2589 Stark street Little Canada, MN 55117 07- 29 -22 -21 -0127 Douglas & Luz Amaya Day 2540 Spruce Street Little Canada, NW 55117 07- 29 -22 -21 -0137 Jerome & Shirley Wester 2590 Sylvan Street Little Canada, NW 55117 07- 29 -22 -21 -0142 Robert & Cynthia Pacyga 2555 Sylvan Street Little Canada, MN 55117 07- 29 -22 -21 -0143 Steven & Kristen Braun 2545 Sylvan Street Little Canada, MN 55117 07- 29 -22 -21 -0144 Dezurik Builders 4570 Churchill Street Shoreview, My 55126 07- 29 -22 -21 -0150 Rockne & Elaine Waite 2651 Lakeshore Avenue Little Canada, MW 55117 07- 29 -22 -21 -0151 Kaiserschorn Custom Howes 3184 Hafner Court Shoreview, MW 55126 07- 29 -22 -21 -0151 Kenneth Hauth 5775 Manning Avenue Stillwater, MW 55082 07- 29 -22 -21 -0152 Page 29 Carol Grogan 9 Demont Avenue Little Canada, MW 55117 07- 29 -22 -21 -0063 Arthur Khan 1305 Pioneer Building St. Paul, MW 55101 07- 29 -22 -21 -0018 William Schleckt 2602 Stark Street Little Canada, MW 55117 07- 29 -22 -21 -0018 Arthur & Lynelle Shannon 2531 Ruth Street Littel Canada, MW 55117 07- 29 -22 -21 -0108 Dennis & Marjorie Barrett 2547 Ruth Street Little Canada, MW 55117 07- 29 -22 -21 -0105 Terence Drassel 2611 Ruth Street Little Canada, MW 55117 07- 29 -22 -21 -0104 Catherine Jansen 2590 Stark Street Little Canada, MW 55117 07- 29 -22 -21 -0111 Keith & Margaret Flickes 2585 Ruth Street Little Canada, MW 55117 07- 29 -22 -21 -0114 Andrew & Brenda Collins 2226 Birch White Bear take, MW 55110 07- 29 -22 -21 -0115 Mark & Mary Fredrick 2560 Ruth Street Little Canada, MW 55117 07- 29 -22 -21 -0115 Administrator of Veteran Affairs Veterans Administration RM 266 C Fort Snelling St. Paul, MW 55111 07- 29 -22 -21 -0116 Scott & Mary Barraclough 2570 Stark Street Little Canada, MW 55117 07- 29 -22 -21 -0117 Page 30 Richard lvhice EPAL 2600 Spruce Street Little Canada, MW 55117 07- 29 -22 -21 -0055 Darrell & Mary Johnson 2597 Stark Avenue Little Canada, MW 55117 07- 29 -22 -21 -0046 Terrance & Roberta McTeague 2565 Stark Street Little Canada, MW 55117 07- 29 -22 -21 -0066 Gregg & Shelly Wilson 2564 Stark Street Little Canada, MW 55117 07- 29 -22 -21 -0076 Darlene Fspejo 2558 Stark Street Little Canada, MW 55117 07- 29 -22 -21 -0077 Duane & Joan Schwartz 2548 Stark Street Little Canada, MN 55117 07- 29 -22 -21 -0078 Terrance Smith 2536 Stark Street Little Canada, MW 55117 07- 29 -22 -21 -0080 Steven & Kwan Michels 2540 Stark Street Little Canada, MW 55117 07- 29 -22 -21 -0079 Barbara Lutz 2530 Stark Street Little Canada, MW 55117 07- 29 -22 -21 -0081 State of Minnesota Trust Exempt 109 Court House St. Paul, MN 55102 07- 29 -22 -21 -0085 George Astrand 1695 Aires Avenue Little Canada, MW 55117 07- 29 -22 -21 -0097 Kelly Anderson 721 County Road J St. Paul, MW 55126 07- 29 -22 -21 -0097 Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. U R B A N P L A N N I N G • D E S I G N • M A R K E R E S E A R C H PLANNING REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: RE: FILE NO: ■ CU, •1 r p Little Canada Planning Comm s}on.; \V,-'' Stephen Grittman 10 October 1989 Little Canada - McTeague Garage CUP 758.09 - 89.58 BACKGROUND Mr. Terry McTeague has requested a Conditional Use Permit to construct a second garage structure on his property at 2565 Stark Street. Mr. McTeague's property extends between Stark and the recently constructed Sylvan Street. As the property is less than 20,000 square feet in area, the owner opted not to split the parcel and was exempted from assessments for Sylvan Street. The current request would allow garage access to Sylvan Street and would apparently violate the 30 foot setback from the right -of- way, although the site plan is not certain on this issue. ANALYSIS When Sylvan Street was constructed, this parcel was exempted from the assessments on request from the property owner, since he had inadequate area for two lots and did not wish to subdivide due to location of the house and other property improvements. This request would permit access to Sylvan without the owner being assessed for the benefit of that access. In this regard, the City has three optional paths. First, the permit may be granted as proposed, or second, it may grant the permit with the stipulation that the assessments be levied. Third, it may grant the permit but deny access to Sylvan Street requiring garage access to be only from Stark. Our concern with the third proposal is one of enforcement. Since Sylvan Street was constructed with surmountable curb, it would be very difficult to effectively prohibit the access. The first option would establish access without assessment for that access. Short of requiring a solid fence across the rear of the lot, the second option appears to be the most viable from the City's standpoint. Page 31 4601 Excelsior Blvd. • Suite 410 -Minneapolis, MN 55416 • (612) 925-9420-Fax 925-2721 RECOMMENDATION We recommend that the City approve the Conditional Use Permit for a second accessory garage subject to the following conditions: o Proportionate assessments are levied for access to Sylvan Street. o In the alternative, a solid fence is constructed prohibiting driveway access to the new garage. o The garage is constructed to meet the 30 foot setback requirement from Sylvan Street. o Recommendations of other City staff. cc: John Palacio Tom Sweeney Don Carley Kathy Glanzer Terry McTeague Page 32 5YL VA N •rRE r, PAoPekrY G/,vE- N /Eig:0/3ot S- 6.4.616-E. G nUE. Re000SEO 6,4,e,466 F{ouse ',lottery t'xJ . SCALE : peek, WEN' ANE 0 6 iz le 14 30 a/o Srf/RK Sr??ear Page 33 Islutnc h -1(i - 217') a InJ;calai Iron Found O Indicates Iron Placed cc I% R. KVID•ERA Reiliatered Land Surveyor PLAT OF SURVEY OF PROPF.RTY OF (1 O a 2 r-71 Dye ra/f 12S5 lMinnelsalla Ave. St. ran), Minn. 5 104 Su%: 1 inch alefO sett. .:ocr■led as inllo•'s. L (9/5 / / /C2 /IiL / "sS /r _f°%^e/O / -le r Z2. 85 fee/ R n 0/ a / %LILo s/ /&zoo 4B . B /oc/t // /yoRT/,' ZC4/l'N• TSB, s '° y C' ?fit / : );� %l7rl r°s! ly. ti 1 ZAXE STREET AMOVIDFsY r ,s / / /Y >[ .>O. f. T LE .CANADA tt) (\.1 /0 9 8 7 6 269.22' .5 4 3 .e 1■ `rl C\; i i . o N // 48 269.2' /2. *7 . /3 -r6 0314. 171CAT3 07 LOCATION 07 iUILWING 1 hereby ccrtify that on , 19__ I cnadc a CUney of tt..e -- rc ;c..ed hsatioo of tht buildin (-t the above dt.crbed pm-petty and tut the Ieutkn of :aid buildIni a correctly ,ho,..n on tat stove plat. Ct :(TtYIGATZ 07 CUZYLY 1 hereby ttrtify that on , 19..- 1 surveyed the grope :ty dncribed store and that the a'oove plat is a ternce reyreaen:16en e1 tidal ISurvey, and there are no enc.-oee.Stnenta erupt as a!asn Frreon• Page 34 cst- ti Little Canada, Minnesota APPLICATION FORM N? 489 PAID O Rec.No 2-z %."7 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Conditional Use Permit Zoning District Amendment X Variance Text Amendment Subdivision Other Planned Unit Development Plan Review Applicant Ely & Yvonne Arcilla 2735 Chisholm Ave. No.St. Paul, MN 55109 770 -5138 (Address) (Phone) Owner (Name) (Same as applicant) (Name) Property Location (Street Address and Legal Description): (Address) 641 Keller Pkwy, Lot 9 Block 2 Bloomquist Lakeside (Phone) Description and /or Reason for Request (Cite Ordinance Sections): CITY OF LITTLE CANADA The above lot is approximately 15,000 sq.ft. and is trapezoidal in shape. One of the set back requirements for building on the above lot is 30 ft. from the back of the property line. Due to the odd shape of the lot, a 30 ft. set back, in addition to the 10 ft. and 30 ft. side and front set backs, will not allow us to build the size and design of house that we prefer, as shown in the attached preliminary site plan. We are therefore requesting for a variance that would provide us with a 10 ft. • _ . - . • I . In signing this application, I hereby acknowledge that 1 have read and fully understand the applicable provisions of the Zon- ing and Subdivision Ordinances and current administrative procedures. I further acknowledge the fee explanation as outlined in the application procedures and hereby agree to pay all statements received from the City pertaining to additional applica- tion expense. Page 35 Nalik (Signature of Applicant) WHITE— Office CANARY— Customer PINK —File GOLD — Planner (Date) PROPOSAL: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING VARIANCE Requesting a variance for a 10 foot rear yard setback. City Code requires a rear yard setback of 30 feet. PROPERTY LOCATION: 641 Keller Parkway PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: PLANNING COMMISSION: CITY COUNCIL: Lot 9, Block 2, Bloomquist Lakeside Addition Ely & Yvonne Arcilla The Little Canada Planning Commission will be reviewing this matter at their October 12, 1989 meeting. The meeting starts at 7:30 P.M. and is held in the Council Chambers located at 515 Little Canada Road. Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held by the City Council on Wednesday, October 25, 1989 at 7:30 P.M., or as soon thereafter as parties may be heard, in the Council Chambers of the City Center located at 515 Little Canada Road. All persons with reference to this matter will be heard during the Planning Commission meeting on October 12th and the City Council meeting on October 25th. Annette Freeman Deputy Clerk Page 36 Mariano & Sheridan Cocchiarella 2780 lakeside Court Little Canada, MN 55117 05- 29-22 -42 -0022 Dean & sharon Hedlund 655 Keller Parkway Little Canada, MN 55117 05- 29 -22 -42 -0021 Michael & Ann Kellogg 2756 Edgerton Street Little Canada, MN 55117 05- 29 -22 -43 -0025 • Joe Weinholzer 327 Little Canada Road Little Canada, MN 55117 05- 29 -22 -43 -0024 Paul & Lura Sprosty 633 Keller Parkway Little Canada, M4 55117 05- 29 -22 -43 -0026 George & Mary Wies 630 Keller Parkway Little Canada, MN 55117 05- 29 -22 -43 -0007 Daniel & Chris Mahai 620 Keller Parkway Little Canada, MN 55117 05- 29 -22 -43 -0008 David & June Wilson 636 Keller Parkway Little Canada, M9 55117 05- 29 -22 -43 -0005 Page 37 Elinor Mickelson 2776 Edgerton Street Little Canada, MN 55117 05- 29 -22 -42 -0038 Ronald & Cynthia Woodbury 2766 Edgerton Street Little Canada, MN 55117 05- 29 -22 -42 -0039 Peter & Alexandria Gangel 1078 Reaney Avenue St. Paul, MN 55106 05- 29 -22 -42 -0035 David Paugel 814 Charles Avenue St. Paul, MN 55104 05- 29 -22 -42 -0036 Robert & Marge Schmuck 2775 Lakeside Court Little Canada, MN 55117 05- 29 -22 -42 -0040 Albert & Jacqueline Graf 2765 Lakeside Court Little Canada, MI 55117 05- 29 -22 -42 -0041 Floyd & Badni Johnson 1726 Iowa Avenue E St. Paul, M9 55106 05- 29 -22 -42 -0042 Shelly & Vicky Paulson 11318 Highway 55 Plymouth, MN 55441 05- 29 -22 -42 -0043 Robert & Kathleen Tipler 2800 Lakeside Court Little Canada, MN 55117 05- 29 -22 -42 -0025 George & Lora Warren 2796 Lakeside Court Little Canada, MN 55117 05- 29 -22 -42 -0024 Raymond & Jeanne Lepsche 2790 Lakeside Court Little Canada, MN 55117 05- 29 -22 -42 -0023 Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. U R B A N P L A N N I N G • D E S I G N • M A R K E T R E S E A R C H i . PLANNING REPORT TO: Little Canada Planning Commission-'--- FROM: Robert Kirmis /Stephen Grittman DATE: RE: FILE NO: BACKGROUND 9 October 1989 Little Canada - Arcilla Setback Variance 758.09 - 89.57 Ely and Yvonne Arcilla have requested a setback variance to allow a 10 foot rear yard setback for Lot 9, Block 2 of Bloomquist Lakeside Addition, located west of Keller Parkway and south of Lakeside Court. The submitted request follows the intention of the applicants to construct a residence upon the subject site which is of a design which conflicts with the site's existing setback standards. The subject site is zoned R -1, Single Family Residential and lies within the City's Shoreland Overlay District. Attached for reference: Exhibit A - Site Location Exhibit B - Detailed Site Location Exhibit C - Site Plan ANALYSIS In evaluating the applicants request, the City Ordinance requires that such a variance meet the following criteria: a. Special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved. (1) Special conditions may include exceptional topographic or water conditions or, in the case of an existing lot or parcel of record, narrowness, shallowness, insufficient area or shape of the property. Page 38 4601 Excelsior Blvd. •Suite 410 •Minneapolis, MN 55416.(612) 925 -9420 •Fax 925••2721 (2) Special conditions and circumstances may not be primarily economic in nature. b. Literal interpretation of the provisions of this Ordinance would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this Ordinance. c. The special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. d. Granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this Ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. e. A genuine hardship exists in complying with the literal terms of this Ordinance. Based on review of the site's configuration and physical surroundings, it appears special conditions do exist which are peculiar to the site and warrant the granting of the requested variance. As shown on the submitted site plan, the subject property is trapezoidal in shape. As such, a typical 30 foot rear yard setback, as required per Ordinance standards, would severely limit the site's buildable area and subsequently, present a hardship to the applicant. It appears the residence floor plan has responded well to the inherent natural features of the area via its southerly orientation toward an existing wetland. It should be noted that the residence's most severe setback infringement lies in its outdoor deck and not in its periphery walls. Therefore, the aesthetic impact of the requested variance is minimized. RECOMMENDATION Review of the applicants setback variance request finds that special conditions do exist which are peculiar to the subject site and therefore, warrant the allowance of a 10 foot rear yard setback. As such, our office recommends approval of the variance request. cc: John Palacio Don Carley Tom Sweeney Kathy Glanzer Ely and Yvonne Arcilla Page 39 I'� fhb map Is for planning purposes only and should not Oa used when precise measurement Is required. northwest associated consultants, inc. Page 40 , EXHIBIT A - SITE LOCATION 2800 yl . V v. 93 It 13 3.$) Z13b 761 I2' • Sw) n, 54 17 775 / 1.0 1a766 A 11 10 , 94 0'11 ti -C C TN:'E R1 Nt- p o; CKEEK /633 4oRAt0/ 2 ° Esmv 0�f� , 1 012 / Z (Z).L 0 ory�,636(5)" -1 I %8. $ ` w 19.12 L p 15 / J.IGd� O 15.31 N,� y0b•.. 619 ��. X32 EXHIBIT B - DETAILED SITE LOCATION Page 41 917'9c l z Q-, PRELIMINARY SITE •1J 0i V c t9'99 Page 42 KELLER PKWY. EXHIBIT C - SITE PLAN r co.ti zs N° 487 Little Canada, Minnesota PAID 2-cj APPLICATION FORM Rec. No 2 -2 `701 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Conditional Use Permit — %-MCNCP 1- Zoning District Amendment Variance Text Amendment Subdivision Other Planned Unit Development Plan Review Applicant k\-( QRaFL SC4- l KY 3311 t-e. -. Qt'r2cctzrc CT VAON JS' 1-Fi� S,S7 25 =434518 (Name) (Address) (Phone) Owner CdrE (Name) Property Location (Street Address and Legal Description): (Address) (Phone) QANKS4 t5t GIc,LAQQ`;� , CCO IkJC73 Sir Z.,rCTt -ce: SSII Description and /or Reason for Request (Cite Ordinance Sections): /REQ■t_S` AN,, Ar e ^,Or-v` ti t` -ro Ov2 CONIJ I-l' t r ' z LSE piRr rnJCPEAS) k-C NuP-•09E2 ALJ -OL(W TO 1"-E7— `'o) CITY OF In signing this application, I hereby acknowledge that I have read and fully understand the appl�twil the Zon- ing and Subdivision Ordinances and current administrative procedures. I further acknowledge th pTanation as outlined in the application procedures and hereby agree to pay all statements received from the City pertaining to additional applica- tion expense. Page 43 rN \WHITE— Office CANARY— Customer PINK —File GOLD — Planner (Signature of Applicanf)- to /a /P9 (Date) PROPOSAL: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Requesting an amendment to existing Conditional Use Permit to increase number of video games allowed on the premises from eight to ten. PROPERTY LOCATION: 2660 Rice Street APPLICANT: Bank Shot Billiards PLANNING COMMISSION: CITY COUNCIL: The Little Canada Planning Commission will be reviewing this matter at their October 12, 1989 meeting. The meeting starts at 7:30 P.M. and is held in the Council Chambers located at 515 Little Canada Road. Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held by the City Council on Wednesday, October 25, 1989 at 7:30 P.M., or as soon thereafter as parties may be heard, in the Council Chambers of the City Center located at 515 Little Canada Road. All persons with reference to this matter will be heard during the Planning Commission meeting on October 12th and the City Council meeting on October 25th. 1 Anneeman Deputy Clerk Page 44 Keith & Diane Harstad C. Ray & Betty McCulloch 3115 Brookshire Lane St. Paul, MN 55112 n7- 2q -92 -22 -0021 Minnezone Investment Co. c/o Larry Coulter 9100 Bloomington Freeway, Suite 140A Bloomington, MN 55431 07- 29 -22 -22 -0021 Resident 100 W. County Road C Little Canada, MN 55117 07- 29 -22 -22 -0021 C. Ray & Betty McCulloch 110 Bank St. SE #1092 Larive Minneapolis, MN 55414 07- 29 -22 -22 -0022 Resident 2617 Park Street Little Canada, MN 55117 07- 29 =22 -22 -0022 Harold Kurkowski c/o Nicholas Kurkowski Life Estate Box #26 Luck, WI 54853 07- 29 -22 -22 -0023 Resident 108 W. County Road C Little Canada, MN 55117 07- 29 -22 -22 -0023 Thomas & Sharan Tubbesing 1118 W County Road C Little Canada, MN 55117 Speedy Market 2080 Rice Street St. Paul, MN 55117 07- 29 -22 -22 -0025 Doris Klein 2620 Rice Street Little Canada, MN 55113 07- 29 -22 -22 -0026 Donald & Carol Behr 2659 Riveria Dr. N. WBL, MN 55110 07- 29 -22 -22 -0032 ROI Financial Group, Inc. 1111 - 3rd Ave. S. Minneapolis, MN 55404 06- 29 -22 -33 -0036 c George & Joan Krienke 111 County Road C West St. Paul, MN 55117 06- 29 -22 -33 -0038 Manivalde & Evelyn Kukk 831 W. County Road C Little Canada, Mn 55117 06- 29 -22 -33 -0026 Page 45 Ruth Steneroden 1970 Asbury Street St. Paul, MN 55113 06- 29 -22 -33 -0021 H. A. Bjorklund et al 60 W. Iona Lane Little Canada, MN 55117 06- 29 -22 -33 -0017 Virgil E. Nelson et al 70 Iona Lane Little Canada, MN 55117 06- 29 -22 -33 -0016 Richard & Jeanette Rohde 6207 Deer Run SW Fort Myers, FL 33908 06- 29 -22 -33 -0013 Paul & Susan Haran 2700 Rice Street St. Paul, MN 55113 06- 29 -22 -33 -0013 Timothy & Katherine Townsley 90 Iona Lane Little Canada, Mn 55117 06- 29 -22 -33 -0014 Francis Gau et al 80 Iona Lane Little Canada, MN 55117 06- 29 -22 -33 -0015 Page 46 Hardware Hank of Roseville 2611 Rice Street Roseville, MN 55113 Jerry's Auto Service 2633 Rice Street Roseville, MN 55113 Rent All MN 2635 Rice Street Roseville, MN 55113 No. Heights Lutheran Church 2701 Rice Street Roseville, MN 55113 Mark Nelson 160 County Road C Roseville, MN 55113 Mitchell Welsh 160 County Road C Roseville, MN 55113 S. Johnson 160 County Road C Roseville, MN 55113 0. Erickson 166 County Road C Roseville, MN 55113 Thomas Timmons 174 County Road C Roseville, MN 55113 Dale & Andrea Srigley 10096 - 67th Lane N. Stillwater, MN 55082 07- 29 -22 -22 -0020 Resident 70 W. County Road C Little Canada, MN 55117 07- 29 -22 -22 -0020 Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. U R B A N P L A N N I N G• D E S I G N• M A R K E -F- R E S E A R C H PLANNING REPORT TO: Little Canada Planning Commis etc FROM: Robert Kirmis /Stephen Grittman DATE: 9 October 1989 RE: Little Canada - Bankshot Billiards - CUP Amendment FILE NO: 758.09 - 89.20 BACKGROUND Mr. Michael Schifsky, representing Bankshot Billiards Inc., has submitted a request to amend a conditional use permit to allow up to ten (10) amusement devices within his billiard center. The original CUP, approved in the Winter of 1987, stipulated that a maximum of eight (8) such devices may be allowed within the facility. The billiard facility in question lies within the Rice at C Center at 2650 Rice Street. The center is zoned B -3, General Business. ANALYSIS In January of 1987, the City Council approved the applicant's original CUP request and established a limit of four (4) amusement devices for a trial period of 120 days. Subsequent review found that the four amusement devices posed no significant problems and the Council amended the original CUP to allow a maximum of eight amusement devices. It is the view of our office that a maximum of ten (10) such devices, as proposed by the applicant would not create any problems or difficulties which may hinder the functioning of the billiard center. A decision concerning the acceptability of ten devices is viewed as an issue of City policy to be made by City Officials. It should be recognized, however, that the City does retain some assurance against any detrimental effects caused by the increased number of amusement devices via the yearly issuance of a business license. Page 47 4601 Excelsior Blvd. •Suite 410•Minneapolis, MN 55416•(612) 925 -9420 •Fax 925 -2721 RECOMMENDATION It is the view of our office that a decision concerning the appropriateness of up to ten amusement devices within the Bankshot Billiards facility is a matter of City policy and should be made to City Officials. As such, our office offers no formal recommendation concerning this matter, other than the comments made within the body of this report. cc: John Palacio Don Carley Tom Sweeney Kathy Glanzer Mike Schifsky Page 48 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING REZONING FROM GENERAL BUSINESS TO RESIDENTIAL ONE PROPOSAL: PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Rezoning of the north half of 89, 83, 77, and 73 West County Road C from B -3 (General Business) to R -1 89 West County Road C Parcel No. 06- 29- 22 -33- 0025 -6 Subj to Co Rd C and drainage esmt and ex W 495 Ft and Ex E 535 Ft the S 10 acres of SW 1/4 of SW 1/4 of Sec 6, Tn 29, Rn 22 83 West County Road C Parcel No. 06- 29- 22 -33- 0026 -9 Subj to Co Rd C and drainage esmt the W 75 Ft of E 535 Ft of S 10 Acres of SW 1/4 of SW 1/4 of Sec 6, Tn 29, Rn 22 77 West County Road C Parcel No. 06- 29- 22 -33- 0027 -2 Subj to Co Rd C and drainage esmt the W 75 ft of E 460 ft of S 10 acres of SW 1/4 of SW 1/4 of Sec 6, Tn 29, Rn 22 73 West County Road C Parcel No. 06- 29- 22 -33- 0028 -5 Subj to Co Rd C and drainage esmt the W 75 ft of E 385 Ft of S 10 acres of SW 1/4 of SW 1/4 of Sec 6, Tn 29, Rn 22 APPLICANT: The City of Little Canada PLANNING COMMISSION: CITY COUNCIL: The Little Canada Planning Commission will be reviewing this matter at their October 12, 1989 meeting. The meeting starts at 7:30 P.M. and is held in the Council Chambers located at 515 Little Canada Road. Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held by the City Council on Wednesday, October 25, 1989 at 7:30 P.M., or as soon thereafter as parties may be heard, in the Council Chambers of the City Center located at 515 Little Canada Road. All persons with reference to this matter will be heard during the Planning Commission meeting on October 12th and the City Council meeting on October 25th. Annette Freeman Deputy Clerk Page 49 Thomas & Sharan Tubbesing 118 W County Road C Little Canada, MN 55117 07- 29 -22 -22 -0024 Speedy Markets, Inc. 2080 Rice Street St. Paul, MN 55117 07- 29 -22 -22 -0025 Doris Klein 2620 Rice Street Little Canada, MN 55113 07- 29 =22 -22 -0026 ROI Financial Group, Inc. 1111 3rd Ave. S. Minneapolis, MN 55404 06- 29 -22 -33 -0036 George & Joan Krienke 111 Co. Road C West St. Paul, MN 55117 06- 29 -22 -33 -0038 Manivalde & Evelyn Kukk 831 W County Road C Little Canada, Mn 55117 06- 29 -22 -33 -0026 Ruth Steneroden 1970 Asbury Street St. Paul, Mn 55113 06- 29 -22 -33 -0021 H. A. Bjorklund et al 60 W. Iona Lane Little Canada, MN 55117 06- 29 -22 -33 -0017 Virgin E. Nelson Et al 70 Iona Lane Little Canada, MN 55117 06- 29 -22 -33 -0016 Paul & Susan Haram 2700 Rice Street St. Paul, MN 55113 06- 29 -22 -33 -0013 Timothy & Katherine Townsley 90 Iona Lane Little Canada, MN 55117 06- 29 -22 -33 -0014 Francis Gau et al 80 Iona Lane Little Canada, Mn 55117 06- 29 -22 -33 -0015 Page 50 Danny Bickham 946 Dawn Avenue St. Paul, MN 55126 07- 29 -22 -22 -0004 Raymond & Janice Wlaschin 2626 Park Street Little Canada, MN 55117 07- 29 -22 -22 -0004 Mark & Deborah Schultz 2610 Park Street Little Canada, Mn 55117 07- 29 -22 -22 -0005 Resident 2617 Park Street Little Canada, Mn 55117 Resident 70 W. County Road C Little Canada, Mn 55117 07- 29 -22 -22 -0020 Keith & Diane Harstad C. Ray & Betty McCulloch 3115 Brookshire Lane St. Paul, MN 55112 07- 29 -22 -22 -0021 Minnesona Investment Co. c/o Larry Coulter 9100 Bloomington Freeway, Suite 140A Bloomington, MN 55431 07- 29 -22 -22 -0021 Resident 100 W. County Road C Little Canada, MN 55117 07- 29 -22 -22 -0021 C. Ray & Betty McCulloch 110 Bank St. S.E. #1902 Larive Minneapolis, MN 55414 07- 29 -22 -22 -0022 Resident 2617 Park Street Little Canada, MN 55117 07- 29 -22 -22 -0022 Harold P. Kurkowski c/o Nicholas Kurkowski Life Estate Box #26 Luck, WI 54853 07- 29 -22 -22 -0023 Resident 108 W. County Road C Little Canada, Mn 55117 07- 29 -22 -22 -0023 Ulusegun AUeuoye 2671 Sylvan Little Canada, MN 55117 06- 29 -22 -34 -0061 Mink Vo & Ly Bui 2677 Sylvan Street Little Canada, MN 55117 06- 29 -22 -34 -0060 David Larson 2683 Sylvan Little Canada, MN 55117 06= 29 -22 -34 -0059 Doc Tan Nguyen & Oank Hoang Ly 1620 Timberlake Road #G St. Paul, MN 55117 06- 29 -22 -34 -0058 Donald & Carol Behr 2659 Riveria Dr. N. WBL, MN 55110 07- 29 -22 -22 -0032 Donald & Betty Lehmann 64 W County Road C St. Paul, MN 55117 07- 29 -22 -22 -0003 Shirley Jones 50 W County Road C Little Canada, Mn 55117 07- 29 -22 -22 -0002 Catherine Wayne, Dewey Roschick, Karen Lee 42 West County Road C Little Canada, MN 55117 07- 29 -22 -22 -0001 Robert Lanoux /Mary Pfalz 2617 Spruce Street Little Canada, Mn 55117 07- 29 -22 -22 -0018 Thomas & Carol White 2623 Spruce Street Little Canada, Mn 55117 07- 29 -22 -22 -0019 Page' 51 Cecelia Pierce 77 W County Road C Little Canada, Mn 55117 06- 29 -22 -33 -0027 Juanita Suchy 73 W County Road C Little Canada, Mn 55117 06- 29 -22 -33 -0028 Eugene Froehle 67 W. County Road C Little Canada, MN 55117 06- 29 -22 -33 -0029 Charles & Pearl Bronson 61 W County Road C Little Canada, MN 55117 06- 29 -22 -33 -0030 Deborah North 55 W County Road C Little Canada, MN 55117 06- 29 -22 -33 -0031 Gregory Scholoer 43 W County Road C Little Canada, MN 55117 06- 29 -22 -33 -0032 richard and Jeanette Rohde 6207 Deer Run SW Fort Myers, FL 33908 06- 29 -22 -33 -0013 George & Jean Gregory 50 Iona Lane Little Canada, MN 55117 06- 29 -22 -33 -0018 Norman Osland 40 Iona Lane Little Canada, MN 55117 06- 29 -22 -33 -0019 Donald and Kathleen Pierce 30 Iona Lane Little Canada, MN 55117 06- 29 -22 -33 -0020 Wm. & Bernadette Hafner 2653 Sylvan Street Little Canada, MN 55117 06- 29 -22 -3% -0037 North Suburban Co. 2125 DeSoto Little Canada, MN 55117 06- 29 -22 -34 -0063 4 r ee : I ILRWIf'\1V /'or\3 A UU. 1 (n) 2 ti': 4o :. 7, 40 50 ROUN 369. SEE v,. #,r coati FOR DErq,Ls 35 z68o 2 2) ( +Sae 41) R 1.17a<. '34 1 640) 3 S2 .73) CD m 3.'4 (4s 5 1 .(36) � +z o O``, 0.5404. + a65 Q v N r . (37) 742 Page • —SP -C .r "I 'kit st M 341 •4• 3 --� ul tow! i q ZS �' 1.4-t- 8 r e* . 11 7b -74�o4 iv 14 bii L� 191�biH 4ib ..L� I }1i q, g 5 K ?�r Kv� Ncie, 1 1 1071/ �— f . 11� :2".:01 5:2 I._ (9.9) 1o2 Co Rd. C. `lb) w. OG Lo< 2 109 7 6 Skill u +(IDi 48 4 yy,445_- 0 L .(5)2; �L 0 D X11) �, t ,t9 w }ow 0 ;B 6 51413 2 /65 ;o4 o I (2 33) 79: 2� /b 5`` cc ".. I":� 3`k3 10H Fr;C Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. U R B A N P L A N N I N G • D E S I G N • M A R K E T R E S E A R C H MEMORANDUM TO: Little Canada City Council FROM: Stephen Grittman DATE: 11 October 1989 RE: Little Canada - Miller & Schroeder/ Barthel Elderly Housing FILE NO: 758.09 - 89.56 Miller and Schroeder has submitted a resolution for EDA adoption. We have a number of reservations about this proposal. Listed below are those issues we find troubling in this resolution: • The resolution mentions a specific unit count (100 units). Unit count and density are Zoning Ordinance performance standards which vary by unit size and site area. Until these details are presented, no assurance of unit count can be given. • The resolution specifically states that the EDA would own the facility. We would recommend that the City not involve itself in ownership of the facility and that private ownership or other alternatives be investigated prior to committing to a specific proposal by resolution. • The resolution states that the construction, ownership, and operation of the facility by the EDA is consistent with the policies of the EDA. We are unclear as to the application of any policies in this regard. • The resolution states that the facility would address a need for elderly housing in the City. While there may be a perceived need for such a project, no such need has been documented by a competent market study. Indeed, the future of several recent similar projects should raise enough concern as to require a full market study prior to any formal commitments by the City. Page 53 4601 Excelsior Bivd. • Suite 410 • Minneapolis, MN 55416 • (612) 925 -9420 • Fax 925 -2721 • The resolution would grant "preliminary approval" to the facility. Preliminary approval is a vague term, but is typically applied to a project in a much more detailed stage than is the current proposal. • The resolution authorizes Miller and Schroeder to determine who is necessary and appropriate to consult on the project. Consultants to the City would typically have development review fees passed through to the developer, however, no development applicant or fees have been filed. As Dan Wilson stated in a previous correspondence, we are uncomfortable having a developer draw up a resolution for the City's adoption in any case. If the Council is attracted to any or all of the developer's proposals, this could be indicated to them without a resolution. Such a proposal would require several stages of review, including Planning Commission review for rezoning, conditional use permit and site plan review, public hearings and Council review and approval. cc: Bob Voto Dan Wilson Tom Sweeney Kathy Glanzer Page 54 ' OCT 10 '89 16:55 MS MPLS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY or THE CITY or LITTLE CANADA RESOLUTION NO, P.2 WHEREAS, the Economic Development Authority of the City of Little Canada (the "Authority") is authorized, under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 459.090 - 464.108, as amended, to undertake the development, construction, and financing of multifamily rental housing facilities for low and moderate income persons and families) and WHEREAS, representatives of Miller & Schroeder Financial, Inc. ( "Miller a Schroeder ") have proposed to the Authority that it initiate a program to finance the construction of a 100 -unit multifamily rental housing facility for elderly persons and elderly families of low and moderate income (the "Facility ") to be owned and operated by the Authority; and WHEREAS, the construction, ownership, and operation of the Facility by the Authority would be consistent with the purposes and policies of the Authority and would address an elderly housing need in the City of Little Canada; NOW, THEREFORE, EE IT RESOLVED THAT; 1. The Authority hereby preliminarily approves the Facility. 2. Miller a Schroeder is hereby authorised to prepare a specific proposal for consideration by the Authority to provide for the acquisition, construction, management, a'nd financing of the Facility (the "Proposal ") at a cost not to exceed $5,000,000. It is requested that in such capacity, Miller & Schroeder identify one or more acceptable sites for the Facility, determine the cows of the Facility, prepare a financing plan, and submit reCOmmendatione as to the operation and management of the Facility. Miller a Schroeder is authorized to consult with Briggs and Morgan, bond counsel to the Authority, Barthel Construction, and other professionals and counsel deemed necessary or appropriate by Miller & Schroeder to prepare the Proposal. 3. It is understood that Miller If Schroeder will prepare the Proposal at its own cost and expense. If the Proposal is accepted by the Authority, Miller a Schroeder will be the exclusive underwriter for any obligations issued by the Authority (or the City of Little Canada) to finance the Facility. Page 55 OCT 10 '89 16:56 MaS MPLS P.3 4. All officers, employees, and agents of the Authority are h■reby directed to cooperate with and assist Miller & Schroeder in the preparation of the Proposal. Page 56 INA Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. U R B A N P L A N N I N G • D E S I G N • M A R K E T R E S E A R C H MEMORANDUM TO: Little Canada City Council FROM: Dan Wilson DATE: 4 October 1989 RE: Little Canada - Barthel - Miller & Schroeder Elderly Housing Proposal FILE N0: 758.09 - 89.56 Stephen Grittman and I met with representatives from the above. We briefly discussed their desire to work with the City in developing an elderly housing project Vitalie Site. They basically would like the City Economic Development Authority to own the facility. They will be present at your Wednesday, October 11, 1989 meeting to introduce themselves. They will present a resolution for you to pass saying the City will work with them. I have reservations about developers presenting resolutions to Councils. I understand that the Council is anxious to see additional elderly housing in Little Canada. I would think your encouraging them to structure a specific proposal for your review would be adequate. They did not specifically ask, but I sense they will ask you to pay for a market study. I told them that market studies are typically done by developers, then reviewed by the City. I believe you have two questions before you give a certain level of interest in elderly housing by the Council: 1. Who do we wish to work with? 2. Exactly what type of elderly project would be supported in Little Canada? i.e., rent range, services provided, amenities, type of building. p #age 57 4601 Excelsior Blvd. • Suite 410 • Minneapolis, MN 55416 • (612) 925-9420 • Fax 925-2721 1. Who to work with: Barthel Construction has been a residential home builder for many years. Although they have built elderly projects, they are using someone else's project as an example. They may very well be qualified to do the project, I just am not that familiar with them. Clearly, there are many elderly housing developers in the Metro Area. Unfortunately, too many have gone broke. 2. Specific Elderly Project: I believe most are aware that the Metro Area has an unusually large number of elderly projects that have defaulted or are in financial trouble. This is primarily the result of overbuilding the market and developers who did not appreciate the complexities of the elderly market. A long waiting list for subsidized ($100 -$200) units cannot be construed to substantiate a market for market rate units ($500 - $600). I suggested to Mr. Wolff from Barthel that a market study was needed. I further suggested that supportable rent levels be established so that they could be compared to rents necessary to break even. Once we know the size of the "gap" we can determine the feasibility of filling the gap with tax increment dollars or other sources. They prefer to have the City own the building, therefore giving the City "control ". I would suggest that we can provide you with all the control necessary, through the Zoning Ordinance and TIF contract. I would be concerned that the "control" might become a "liability" on an empty building. Basically, we need specifics of the project before we can respond. Steve Grittman is available to be at the Council meeting with Barthel and Miller and Schroeder if you wish. cc: Bob Voto Page 58 Star Tribune' Sunday October 1/1989 1D Default level hies f ®r. b®rlds': Trusts sold by • Bloomington firm; By Joe Blade Staff Writer An extraordinary Icvcl of defaults: and financial reverses has struck uniC' • : trusts of high -risk, high -yield inunici pal bonds. sold by the Bloomington;' bond house of Miller & Schroeder_ Financial Inc.. • An analysis by the Star Tribune-5f the trusts sold by the bond lions&. between 1985 to 1987 reveals •that bonds that originally made • up.''a. quarter of the firm's $88 millionwal;.. uc have suffered defaults or Other` troubles. • By comparison, defaults on 46;268;: municipal issues sold nationwide; • • from 1984 through 1988 totaledjust;' 1.1 percent, says the Public Securities' Administration in New York. • "I would say that's high by any Stan dard," a spokesman for the organizes . tion of municipal -bond underwriters" said of the defaults in Miller &• Schroeder's trusts. , Furthermore, the resale. prices: of bonds in five of the last 12 trusts has so far that if all investors'sold • . now, they would suffer a $10 million- loss on their $40 million investmcnf. I Some of the troubled bonds continue, paying interest, while others bave' stopped; some have repaid thc'prin=,.. cipal in whole or in part, while othefs- threaten holders with the loss of tgost, their investment. Miller & Schroeder will not share in investors' losses; confirmed 'Paul' Ek- holm, senior vice president ai the bond house. The firm made its mon cy when it created and sold the trusts: Ekholn ,said.it'had stopped selling the trusts almost three years ago, and no longer had any activity in them. He did not-contest figures on defaults : ,..and the current valuo:ofthc:trusts ., . ; . ^`-"Wc'4hought'thcynnet'a i rharket need :, H..:at. thcitinic,:':„ Ekholm'said. "At the Mime, I'think -they were similar:. to: ;types of investments offered by other dealers. i ' ;ti 1, Uiiit 'trusts ill have been "a_`' dull, safe investment that return tax;.: exempt intcrest',to':;investors. -Thep:: provide a sharc in packages of mu- nicipal bonds that remain in the Trust; until they are paid of . Bonds in Miller. • &' Schrocdcr's' unit .-trusts werowcjhlc7 toward cycnuc_- _bonds wlfichtdre`, issued . by private' businesses under;tlic,tax.cxcmpt um • brclla of a'govcrnmeti body.'= A key distinction..betwcen revenue bonds and general •obligation bonds'. is that the government entity does. not stand behind revenue bonds in: the event of default: That's why.those Bonds continued on•page 4D ..._ Page 59 CA t..• F - ap.w fa1'. w'^ O' ° i 0 7 p. _. O0 ina° -55:FN a -' C d n O' Nom -", ." W ti 5 y c2 0 • n EAa rNa no of alert w. w n C tJl 0 O"'1'°• !.`wt-.' pow.. a yN d.N 'OQ (0 o 0E p. tCe 3 uN. w:o p o o• 5• -<"." n ?.�� o G�..w.F tCe.a OC. »8n�''G� may. -d•; ;xa. Wa2 d Hwy CO ° ENO nN� OO p... O �n �dN .G w le ...l. n C .Go a o� OO d w O.: O O Po c -'on p-�n aw �i -•nSce17 m-. 6059NC.. .P'+N q' „N. Oyw0On ••C On NN' O N' O � % d • '7 O rn ry • I C p a. a szt, a,G N N T 1�. (D tl 0 a n 0:0 o'io:'ti C°. 'O cc $o y .:'bov'7o j. • �a.N °rtd0 N.... -f; R'S'w n Ci0 • O n C_ n • w ° S'.9.,0 n... go b <ag t�cy D'cn ° yOND z <00,,,,i r OF OO'°aN , Y .^ rt. `1 � '�3' w "a lnir• ..' 0- ° O 0 5 7, [NO Q C O n ,-. ° .+ SAO:a .y' =w o0 CaH P'. n.y co, yq� "to ca• �....ti. ^.....'od �.(4.."...)C) o p'��- .5.5.N a - -. • y w_ °, w. d .±'.° Y n I P 2 c..o o �J' n. n °, ' (Y co o n b-3ao a. >. c--.w w n xn -'' °'C rn^ '� •n �Z w. .°'s °0.. •w =^ Gaoyoo cv� w °va n��c'O ao • mn 5aa n• ow bow w Ye,a `' to o. _O.: p, 0.a �.-' go . �o°ea"'"'”' V.-7 °notion 1 �. ty q°., won.. rva� n�. c 7 -.,?,43 n N n .-; : 9 n ° •O C � o� 12. � ,°y, � a'+ o H 0 8 rc a m NgO YO ''w C Nn `.. n N° �. CO j. CD Re. Q'c 0.: 0 N '_.°,n x•N 01 0• 0° 3 WOO —"'' 0 3 10 tC"i.s N. 0 p MO _^ E 5 ° -0.. P• n d :^ 0 ~ ' 019 Or —"tn. 0.- of n or o (C(yD0CnOC Cawn.0'°'o'5..' y175. °om_a 0 _B n 0.- .(„o t�A N''.. .nylbnO Y ?'n'1 o.0'..-.. a''. "nl° ~ 0- (Y 0 ,7 . N w R n a .+ n `7 Hav,r°.,. ° °.y OO en0dOy0.p.O 9."»O-W X0.0 2.3 f4 an�tt ?0-w 05' tvol•HO a wo0. . .n.O.O n CAS Q. ..n. f3:^cN ^n On( °ate tan O5. 0-.. aC aN 9 0•G ..S 00.. -(rey • `•• .7. a (n n~ nn N N N .° O. •H .. N Y' M. . y O 9 n E' .,. n a i0 Y' n g £' W °ton ONa. 5' ❑ yTnw :n -.'2 n 0 en cn a co °'w'' °� - » °o' 0 5'H'a�c-..< t'. °i� °c.m 0 0. V/ m 0 O •0 0 C7 w �y °-N'..a0 5.0'7 g o•O n Co en 0 H Cy w Sr Na W. 5o. O' how w y° 9 C N '_I "f °• n 0 0 o 2 C 5•a0 O'w o • r° a o W n° N C N. _ o l l w • °' ? a °' ° io Ow�70 °-ni . Bo' n0 C W° .p Na?is- O !ao C • �d Ng flit, a.. P. nCb ob bo g�p y .7-.'O C y Ia. S to 0n _ 05'0-0 O'N» CO CO • • N G. ?N S no "' n ° o fie `G 0 , 5• � 2, O 0 0 0 n N.O. `Na0 d ry 704 9.o° 0 c' 0 -, 3 a ' n wC 00 N E C P N 0 H5 —5 C g = 0 5 0 O o 0 0 M3�. go w d a 0 0 co 0 n• o o 0 O co r4. O O an 0 w 0 0. Page 60 Elk RAMSEY COUNTY LOU McKENNA Director ROGER VIK Asst Director DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION COUNTY OF RAMSEY 113138 COURT HOUSE .\ ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55107 /�� ^ �_= DIVISION MANAGERS 'r 7i(•,. i�. 77� /}JCNARD D. WARD September 13, 1989r, ;. : ,' .,� op.nyValuarion IC -- 1JM' ' LEONARD F. OLSON : ..: 1 Y J.' 'Winue LIT- i i = • irlii' .O? C.`THOMAS OSTHOFF 'PEGGV RECTOR ' �� Records ;/JOHN C. McLAUGH LIN Abstract. Title and Ownership Mr. Joseph G. Chlebeck, Clerk- Treasurer City of Little Canada 515 E. Little Canada Road St. Paul, MN 55117 Dear Mr. Chlebeck: The property on the attached list forfeited to the State of Minnesota on August 31, 1989. Opposite the property code number and description is the Auditor's number, original and remaining balance for 1989. Please correct your records accordingly as we will not extend the installments to the 1990 tax rolls. CAS:MD:el Attach. cc: Edit & Control Land Commissioners Special Assessments Very truly yours, LEONARD F. OLSON Manager, Revenue Division ..' \ ) By: (1- .. e. i .w,/ . Christopher A. Samuel, Supvr. Tax-Accounting Section Page 651e.e. 1_55nnu_,au -ur+ 7- 29- 22 -22- 0009 -5 Parcel 1- 55000- 230 -05 7- 29- 22 -22- 0008 -2' Pnrce I.UUC 7- 29- 22 -22- 0007 -9 Parcel i • Plat 02963 North Heights Lot 25 Block 5 Plat 02963 North Heights Lot 24 Block 5 Plat 02963 North Heights Lot 23 Block 5 t tD n n n H w b n j /-4 t 0 q VI r r w to to N r w to r w C d n ETTS n r W N r W to r W 0 ^� n b C a OS'£OL'ST r T r r to tT 2,542.25 N to t0 N N N Original Assessment Page 62 rn N CO r O 6,484.78 r O r ON o o r r tD CR ID t•-• r' 'O 0 1 ∎0 n A i