|
Land Use Control
<br />3. The council holds a public hearing on 10
<br />days' published notice;
<br />4. The council adopts the map by ordinance;
<br />and
<br />5. The city files the ordinance and map with
<br />the register of deeds. 49
<br />Filing of Zoning and
<br />Subdivision Documents
<br />As of January 1, 1983, cities must file with the
<br />county recorder certified copies of all conditional
<br />use permits and variances, as well as all zoning
<br />and subdivision ordinances, amendments, maps,
<br />and regulations. 50 Any document or order the law
<br />requires cities to file must contain a legal descrip-
<br />tion of the property to which it applies.
<br />The intent of the legislation is to provide
<br />prospective buyers with notice of existing land -use
<br />restrictions on a particular parcel of property. The
<br />requirement, however, was burdensome to
<br />administer and raised several legal questions about
<br />the validity of unfiled documents.
<br />In 1983, the legislature passed a law with the in-
<br />tent to remove the filing requirement for zoning
<br />documents while retaining the requirement for
<br />subdivision regulations. The law also stated that
<br />failure to file any land -use document would not af-
<br />fect its validity. Due to passage of another con-
<br />tradictory bill, the final statutory requirements for
<br />filing land -use documents are difficult to inter-
<br />pret. 51 Because of this, cities should file with the
<br />county all zoning and subdivision documents until
<br />such time as the legislature clarifies this area. The
<br />provision allowing enforcement of unfiled docu-
<br />ments will apply regardless of the interpretation
<br />of the filing requirements.
<br />B. Acquisition, Sale, and Other
<br />Disposal of Real Estate
<br />The law permitting the conveyance of tax -
<br />forfeited land to a city 52 may be a method a city
<br />could use to acquire land as part of its community
<br />development program. 53
<br />In addition to the law permitting cities to acquire
<br />tax - forfeited land, statutory cities may acquire,
<br />either within or without their corporate limits,
<br />such real and personal property by purchase, gift,
<br />devise, condemnation, lease, or otherwise. it may
<br />hold, manage, control, sell, convey, lease, or other-
<br />wise dispose of such property as its interests re-
<br />quire. 54 This is ample authority for the city to
<br />dispose of land it does not hold in trust for a
<br />specified public use. 55 Home rule charters
<br />usually contain similar provisions.
<br />Any county, town, city, or other public corpora-
<br />tion may convey its lands for nominal fee or with-
<br />out consideration to any governmental subdivision,
<br />another public corporation, or to the Minnesota
<br />state armory building commission for public use
<br />when its governing body authorizes it . S6
<br />Special problems arise in conveying park
<br />property or property the city holds in trust for
<br />some particular public purpose. Usually a statute
<br />or charter is necessary to enable a city to alienate
<br />lands it holds in trust and uses for a specific pur-
<br />pose. if a city has dedicated land for a public park
<br />or square, for example, the city corporation holds
<br />the property in trust for the public and has no
<br />power to divert the land from the uses and pur-
<br />poses of its original dedication. 57
<br />If a city acquires a park or public square by
<br />dedication on a plat, by condemnation, or by deed,
<br />it may hold only an easement in the property, not
<br />absolute fee simple title. Consequently, it has no
<br />interest to convey. Perhaps the city can eliminate
<br />the limitation to use an area as a public park or
<br />square through formal vacation in the same way it
<br />would vacate a street. S8
<br />If a city has acquired park property by a deed
<br />containing no restrictions on its use, authority to
<br />sell it for other purposes is uncertain. Most cases
<br />have held that if a public entity acquired land with-
<br />out restriction as to use, it may sell it for other
<br />purposes. 59 This is true even though the public
<br />entity improved and used the land for a certain
<br />period, such as a park. There is some authority,
<br />however, for the stricter view that where a city pur-
<br />chases land for a park and uses it uninterruptedly
<br />as such for a long period, the use, itself amounts
<br />to a dedication, and the city cannot sell or lease it
<br />for other purposes, even though the deed of pur-
<br />chase does not limit the use to park purposes. 60
<br />If the deed restricts the purpose, the city must
<br />examine the specific language to determine
<br />whether the deed created a trust. If so, the city
<br />cannot sell the property, or the "fee simple deter-
<br />Page 232 Handbook for Minnesota Cities
<br />Page 93
<br />
|