Laserfiche WebLink
FEE -26 -1990 15.02 FROM SEH <br />✓DQ-C <br />TO <br />42445-33 <br />p. 0 <br />7716--/ 0)4/ P G/ /9 hite7 /9-fitnanc76 ecvv �-��2 <br />~� <br />.07 us t- So( 6,- 7o ev /6/2SC 6W 7,-c4 c <br />• <br />Clarifications and interpretations: to ENGINEER written notice of intention to appeal from <br />such a decision. <br />9.4. ENGINEER will issue with reasonable promptness <br />such written clarifications or interpretations of the require* <br />mcnts of the Comiact Documents fin the form of Drawings <br />Of otherwise) as ENGINEER may determine necessary. which <br />shall be consistent with or reasonably inferable from the <br />overall intent of the Contract Documents. If CONTRACTOR <br />believes that a written clarification or interpretation justifies <br />an increase in the Comract Price or an extension of the <br />Contract Time and the parties are unable to agree to the <br />amount or extent thereof. CONTRACTOR may make a claim <br />therefor as provided in Article 11 or Article 12. <br />Authorized Variations in Work: <br />9.5. ENGINEER may authorize minor variations in the <br />Work from the requirements of the Contract Documents which <br />do not involve an adjustment in the Contract Price or the <br />Contract Time and are consistent with the overall intent of <br />the Contract Documents. These may be accomplished by a <br />Field Order and will be binding on OWNER. and also on <br />CONTRACTOR who shall perform • the Work involved <br />promptly. If CONTRACTOR believes that a Field Order <br />justifies an increase in the Contract Price or an extension of <br />the Contract Time and the parties are unable to agree as to <br />the amount or extent thereof. CONTRACTOR may make a <br />claim therefor as provided in Article 11 or 12. <br />Rejecting Defective Work: <br />9.6. ENGINEER will have authority to disapprove or <br />reject Work which ENGINEER believes to be defective. and <br />will also have authority to require special inspection or testing <br />of the Work as provided in paragraph 13.9. whether or not <br />the Work is fabricated, installed or completed. <br />Shop Drawings, Change Orden and Payments: <br />9,7. In connection with ENGINEER's responsibility for <br />Shop Drawings and samples. sere paragraphs 6.23 through <br />6.29 inclusive. <br />9.8. in connection with ENGINEER's responsibilities as <br />to Change Orders, see Articles 10, 11 and 12. <br />9.9. In connection with ENOINEER's responsibilities in <br />respect of Applications for Payment. etc., see Article 14. <br />Determinations for Unit Prices: <br />9.10. ENGINEER will determine the actual quantities <br />and classifications of Unit Price Work performed by CON. <br />TRACTOR. ENGINEER will review with CONTRACTOR <br />ENGINEER's preliminary determinations on such matters <br />before rendering a written decision thereon (by recommen• <br />dation of an Application for Payment or otherwise). ENGI- <br />NEER's written decisions thereon will be final and binding <br />upon OWNER and CONTRACTOR. unless. within ten days <br />after the date of any such decision, either OWNER or CON. <br />TRACTOR'delivers to the other party to the,Agreement and <br />Decisions on Disputes: <br />9.11. ENGINEER will be the initial interpreter of the <br />requirements of the Contract Documents and judge of the <br />acceptability of the Work thereunder. Claims, disputes and <br />other matters relating to the acceptabrhty of the Work or Inc <br />interpretation of the requirements of the Contract Document, <br />pertaining to the performance and furnishing or the Work and <br />claims under Articles 11 and 12 in respect of changes in the <br />Contract Price or Contract Time will he referred Inmall) to <br />ENGINEER in writing with a request for a formal decision <br />in accordance with this paragraph, which ENGINEER will <br />render in writing within a reasonable time. Written nuticc of <br />each such claim. dispute and other matter will be delivered <br />by the claimant to ENGINEER and the other party to the <br />Agreement promptly (but in no event later than thing days) <br />after the occurrence of the event giving rise thereto. and <br />written supporting data will be submitted to ENGINEER and <br />the other party within sixty days after such occurrence unless <br />ENGINEER allows an additional period of time to ascertain <br />more accurate data in support of the claim. <br />9.12. When functioning as interpreter and judge under <br />paragraphs 9.10 and 9.11, ENGINEER will not show par- <br />tiality to OWNER or CONTRACTOR and will not he liable <br />in connection with any interpretation or decision rendered in <br />good faith in such capacity. The rendering of a decision b) <br />ENGINEER pursuant to paragraphs 9.10 and 9.11 with respect <br />to any such claim, dispute or other matter (except any w hruh <br />have been waived by the making or acceptance of final pay- <br />ment as provided in paragraph 14.161 will be a condition <br />precedent to any exercise by OWNER or CONTRACTOR <br />of such rights or remedies as tither may otherwise has c under <br />the Contract Documents or by Laws or Regulations in respect <br />of any such claim, dispute or other matter. <br />Limitations an ENGINEER's Responsibilities: <br />9.13, Neither ENGINEER•% authority to act under this <br />Article 9 or elsewhere in the Contract Documents nor ans <br />decision made by ENGINEER in good faith either to exercise <br />Or not exercise such authority shall give rise to any dots or <br />responsibility of ENGINEER to CONTRACTOR. any Sub- <br />contractor. any Supplier, or any other person or organization <br />performing any of the Work. or to any surety for any of them. <br />9.14. Whenever in the Contract Documents the terms —as <br />ordered ". "as directed ", "as required ". "as allowed ". '•ae <br />approved" or terms of like effect or import are used, or the <br />adjectives "reasonable ", "suitable ", "acceptable ". "proper" <br />or "satisfactory" Or adjeCtivCS of like effect or import are <br />used to describe a requirement, direction. review or judgment <br />of ENGINEER as to the Work, it is intended that such <br />requirement, direction. review or judgment will he solely to <br />evaluate the Work for compliance with the Contruct Docu- <br />ments (unless there is a specific statement indicating other- <br />wise). The use of any such term or adjective shall not he <br />20 <br />Page 2 <br />