Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br />As an example, if a situation arises in which a problem is identified, and it is ajudged that <br />an extra is due the affected contractor(s) to make the change, by the Construction <br />Manager, and the Architects, the following chain of events should follow: <br />1. Construction Manager immediately notifies the Architect, (and when required the <br />Architect will notify the engineer), and the owner that a condition exists which may <br />require additional payment to a contractor for work outside the contract work <br />scope. (This is especially true if the construction schedule could be delayed) <br />2. The Construction Manager and Architect shall determine as accurately as <br />possible, the scope of additional work required to resolve the conflict or problem, <br />and confirm it with the contractor(s) involved, notifying the Owner of the <br />anticipated scope of the change, as well, at that time. <br />3. The contractor(s), will be asked to verbally estimate, to the best of their <br />knowledge, the costs involved including overhead and profit, to correct the <br />situation. (In some instances the only acceptable path of correction may be in the <br />exercising of unit pricing or T & M construction, but that is only the exception). <br />This verbal estimate is to be as accurate an assessment as possible, at the time, <br />and is not necessarily binding the contractor, if conditions are discovered to be <br />significantly more involved or larger inscope than when first reviewed by the <br />contractor(s), the Construction Manager and the Architect: <br />4. The Owners representative is notified of the anticipated cost of the work, with <br />recommendations from both the Construction Manger and the Architects, and is <br />asked to respond with a verbal notice to proceed, if the anticipated cost of <br />correction is below a preset ceiling limit. The Owner's representative should have <br />authority to authorize up to $5000.00 in charges on his authority. <br />5. The Owners representative verbally approves the request to proceed with <br />corrective measures. This approval is passed back to the Contractor(s), and he is <br />notified to proceed with the work. <br />6. The Construction Manager issues a proposal request to formally request a written <br />response from eh contractor(s). <br />7. The contractors respond, in writing, to the Construction Manager's proposal <br />request, the Construction Manager reviews the cost and passes the response <br />along, with his recommendation, to the Architects and Owners for review. <br />8. Architect makes his recommendation to the Owner, <br />9. Owner accepts and confirms in writing to Construction Manager, with a copy to <br />the Architect. *(As long as price is verifiable and justified, it should also be in line <br />with verbal quote) <br />"10. Construction Manager issues change order to accept the cost of the correction, <br />addition, deletion, into the scope of the work. <br />The scenario outlined above is only for those situations where immediate action is <br />dictated, so as not to disrupt the progress of the job, or to avoid additional costs which <br />would accrue because the work cannot be modified immediately. In most cases, a <br />proposal request will be issued by the Construction Manager to all parties. The <br />appropriate contractor(s) shall respond, and the response will be reviewed by the <br />4 <br />Page 19 <br />