Laserfiche WebLink
Control Results <br />In the fall of 2009, the City contracted with Metro Bowhunters Resource Base (MBRB), a non- <br />profit organization of bowhunters to conduct a controlled hunt in the area of St. John's Cemetery <br />and other adjoining lands. 13 deer were removed from that area over three, two -day hunt periods <br />that were spaced three weeks apart. The first hunt resulted in 10 deer being taken. The second <br />yielded three deer and no deer were taken during the last hunt. <br />In 2010, the hunt areas were expanded and 52 deer were taken in the designated control areas. <br />Even with 52 deer taken and 42 of them coming from the areas in the NE part of the City, one <br />can see from the chart previously discussed that the population only dropped from 81 to 69 in <br />that area. Furthermore, the St. John's Cemetery Area had been hunted for two years and still had <br />a population of 13 deer! That number was down only one deer from 2010. This indicates the <br />need for a continued program if numbers are to be reduced and then maintained at acceptable <br />levels. <br />In 2011, 33 deer were taken from the designated hunt areas. We also added additional hunt areas <br />consisting of Gervais Mill, LC Elementary (south portion) & Spooner Park, and the Frattalone <br />Property). These areas had additional restrictions and were late season additions. No deer were <br />taken from these areas in 2011. <br />In 2012, hunt areas again remained essentially the same. 20 deer taken in Little Canada and an <br />additional 7 were taken in the Spoon Lake area, a new site added by the City of Maplewood in <br />2012. (See Exhibit B for details on deer taken in 2012.) <br />It is important to state that it is not the City's intent to eradicate deer from the community. <br />Rather, deer are considered to be a valuable element of Little Canada's ecosystem in <br />which, absent natural predators, humans must assume the role of controlling the deer <br />population at healthy and socially acceptable levels. <br />It appears the majority of residents favor the City's efforts to attempt to control the population. <br />The number of complaints about deer impacts to property had been increasing prior to the <br />program's implementation. As we have continued our efforts and as the population has dropped, <br />complaints have subsided. <br />Our Control Program has been publicized in the City's newsletter and been the subject of <br />conversation at many Council Meetings. In 2011, the City's Community Survey was completed. <br />We specifically asked about our wildlife control programs. The results of that survey show <br />support for this type of effort with 59% deeming this program essential or very important <br />and only 9% calling it "unimportant ". Furthennore, when discussing funding of this program, <br />78% wanting to maintain or increase the service while 21% wanted to cut or eliminate funding. <br />It should also be noted that "out-of-pocket" expenditures for the deer control program are very <br />low relative to the City's Budget and run less than $1,000 per year. There is staff time devoted <br />to coordinating the program that is not accounted for in that number. <br />3 <br />3 <br />