Laserfiche WebLink
3/29/91 <br />Mayor Raymond Hanson <br />City of Little Canada <br />515 E Little Canada ltd. <br />Little Canada, Mn. 55117 <br />Earl Silbaugh <br />47 LaBore Rd. <br />Little Canada, Mn. <br />Subject: Proposed Yorkton Ridge West development <br />Mayor Hanson <br />I am concerned about the buffer between the residential and <br />industrial areas of the proposed development. Experience has indicated <br />that this industrial area has been a point of contention with the adjacent <br />residents by being the source of such annoyances as noisy industrial <br />blowers and compressors, chemical fumes, and glaring flood lights. <br />Incidentally, the noises mentioned are not limited to day time hours but <br />generally continue throughout most of the night and weekends. <br />There is an existing berm along part of this property line of about <br />fifteen feet in height as measured from the residential side. This berm does <br />a fair job of shielding some of the homes from ground level activities such <br />as truck and auto traffic, pedestrian activity, and the staging of industrial <br />supplies and debris in the parking lot. It provides no shielding, however, <br />from annoyances, such as roof top mechanical system and flood lights, <br />generated from sources located high enough so as not to be buffeted by it. <br />My concern is that the developers proposal involves reducing, or <br />eliminating, what buffer does exist when in fact he should be considering <br />improving this separation. His proposal is to address the buffer issue <br />separately with the individual owners of each residential lot which abuts <br />the industrial area. I find this disturbing as this buffer, while protecting <br />individual homes, is also there to protect an entire neighborhood with a <br />potential of approximately fifty homes. It seems irrational to allow just one <br />home owner to destroy the effectiveness of a buffer established to protect an <br />entire development. <br />In order to shield our homes from these annoyances a physical <br />barrier, high enough to provide visual privacy and massive enough to act as <br />a noise barrier, must exist for the entire length of this development. This <br />issue cannot be left solely to the discretion of the future residents of this <br />development since it also effects the existing homes to the south. While the <br />newer homes will be located between the existing residential area and the <br />industrial park they will not provide a continuous buffer to this area, nor <br />will they act as a visual separation since many of the existing homes will <br />look over the new dwellings. <br />I would also like to state that when this industrial area was <br />developed we were left with the impression that the proposed be would be <br />composed of clean fill taken from the adjacent sand pits and then <br />landscaped. What the berm was actually built of was debris excavated from <br />Page 33 <br />