My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-13-1991 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
11-13-1991 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2014 11:25:58 AM
Creation date
7/23/2013 1:55:39 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ceafr <br />515 Little Canada <br />(612) 484 <br />November 8, <br />95;e74 ceanaela <br />Road, Little Canada, MN 55117 -1600 <br />-2177 / FAX: (612) 484 -4538 <br />1991 <br />TO: Mayor Hanson and Members of the City Council <br />FROM: Joel R. Hanson, City Administrator <br />RE: Park and Recreation Director Position <br />MAYOR <br />Raymond G. Hanson <br />COUNCIL <br />Beverly Scalze <br />Bill Blesener <br />Rick Collova <br />Jim LaValle <br />ADMINISTRATOR <br />Joel R. Hanson <br />As you know, a committee chaired by Council Member Bev Scalze <br />consisting of Park Commission Chairperson Ken Wehrle, Planning <br />Commission Chairperson Gene DeLonais, Little Canada Recreation <br />Association President Steve Morelan, and myself have been meeting to <br />prepare our recommendation regarding the Park and Recreation Director <br />job description. Much information was reviewed in our evaluation <br />with some of it being enclosed for your information. A summary of <br />the key points of our meetings is as follows: <br />*On pages 25 through 28 the proposed job description for a <br />full -time position is enclosed. This description was put <br />together based on comments received from Jim Morelan, review of <br />other park and rec director job descriptions, and the unique <br />needs we felt should be addressed for the City of Little <br />Canada. It should be noted that we did not address job <br />descriptions for the assistants position at this time given the <br />uncertainties surrounding the positions and based on the fact <br />that our full -time director should be involved in drafting these <br />after an initial transition period is completed. <br />*No consensus was reached on a proposed salary range. <br />Salary range information is included on pages 29 through 32. <br />You will note that it includes a range that I developed last <br />year as part of our salary discussions. You will also note that <br />this range can be considered comparable to those of cities our <br />size. In establishing a final salary range, three factors <br />should be considered. They are the number of candidates in the <br />job market. This would seem to indicate a range of $25,000 to <br />$30,000 could be paid without seriously reducing the number of <br />available candidates. The lower the salary the less difficult <br />it will be for the City to fund this position. The other factor <br />which must be considered are the long -term needs of the <br />department. While in the short -term we may be able to save <br />some money by paying a lower salary, one has to consider that <br />F'•g e 2 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.