Laserfiche WebLink
0 :3. 2 0. :=I <br />1 ci := : S F; FL'l *LEAGUE OF MN CITIES <br />Did you know? <br />Peter Tritz <br />Liability insurance for temporary wine and beer <br />licensees <br />Should temporary beer or wine <br />licensees carry liquor liability <br />insurance even though the statutes <br />don't require that they do? <br />Since 1985, Minnesota statutes have <br />required that most beer, wine, and <br />liquor licensees have liquor liability <br />insurance as a condition of being eligtle <br />for a license. However, certain licen- <br />sees with relatively small volumes of <br />liquor sales are exempt from the insur- <br />ance requirement. Specifically, the <br />statutes do not require insurance for <br />on -sale beer licensees whose sales <br />were less than $10,000 in the previous <br />year; off -sale beer licensees whose <br />sales were less than $20,000 in the <br />previous year; on -sale wine licensees <br />whose sales were Less than $10,000 an <br />the previous year; or any temporary <br />wine licensee. These exceptions mean <br />that most of the time the statutes <br />would not require insurance for a beer <br />garden or wine bar that a non - profit <br />corporation operates in connection with <br />a community celebration or special <br />event. <br />Because a city can be more restric- <br />tive than the statutes in establishing <br />requirements for beer and liquor licen- <br />ses, a city can require licensees to <br />have dram shop insurance even when <br />the statutes do not. One good reason <br />for doing so is that it provides protec- <br />tion to innocent members of the public <br />who may be injured as a result of an <br />illegal sale of liquor. However, if the <br />city requires a non -profit organization <br />to have liquor liability insurance, it <br />increases the costs and decreases (or <br />perhaps even eliminates) the organiza- <br />tion's profits. Because these organiza- <br />tions often use the proceeds for <br />community projects, many city councils <br />are reluctant to impose these additional <br />costs when state law doesn't require <br />the insurance. <br />But even when the statutes don't <br />require it, this insurance may be a good <br />idea for several reasons. First, small- <br />volume beer or wine sellers are not <br />exempt from being sued or from being <br />held liable for damages arising out of a <br />sale of beer or wine to an under -age <br />person or to an intoxicated person. <br />Even though they do not need to have <br />insurance, they can sail be sued. And <br />if a court finds that they have made an <br />illegal sale, there is no limit on the <br />amount of damages for which they can <br />be held liable. <br />Of course, some organizations tnay <br />be willing to run that risk, If they are <br />sued and held liable, they would simply <br />turn over the corporation's assets and <br />file bankruptcy. <br />While that might be an acceptable <br />result from the organization's stand- <br />point, it doesn't necessarily solve all of <br />the problems. First, this strategy <br />would only work for an incorporated <br />organization. It is apparently possible <br />for an unincorporated organization to <br />receive a temporary beer license. <br />Members of an unincorporated organi- <br />zation may well find themselves per- <br />sonally liable for the association's <br />activities. <br />Another problem remains even with <br />an incorporated organization. The prob- <br />lem is that any person who makes an <br />illegal sale can be held liable. An injured <br />party might choose to sue the individual <br />bartender who made the illegal sale, <br />instead of (or in addition to) suing the <br />licensed organization. This might be <br />particularly attractive to the injured <br />party if he or she knew that the <br />organization had no insurance and min- <br />imal assets. <br />The result could be that an individual <br />member of the organization who volun- <br />teered to help tend bar may wind up <br />facing substantial legal fees to defend <br />the suit, and possibly having his or her <br />personal assets at risk if the court finds <br />that he or she made an illegal salt that <br />resulted in an injury. (In some cases, <br />the liability section of a homeowner's <br />policy or a personal liability policy might <br />protect the individual—provided, of <br />course, that the limits in the policy <br />were adequate.) <br />In short, even though liquor liability <br />insurance is not always required by <br />statute, the city may wish to consider <br />requiring all beer and liquor sellers to <br />have insurance anyway. Any non -profit <br />organizations and their members who <br />plan to sell beer or wine as a fund- <br />raiser should consider the possible <br />implications for personal liability if they <br />do so without insurance. ■ <br />Post It" brand fax transmittal memo 767 <br />SIMS <br />ISMS <br />'ISMS <br />• nondestructive tests • environmental studies <br />• quality assurance • water tank inspections <br />• fire damage evaluations <br />Mankato (507) 6254211 <br />Rochester (507) 288 -7060 <br />St, Cloud (612) 255 -9014 <br />St. Paul (612) 645-3601 <br />32 PAGE 76F <br />Minnesota Cities <br />