Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />MARCH 11, 1992 <br />Ryan, his property address was Country Drive. As <br />further development occurred his address was changed to <br />Ryan Drive. Stanke stated that he was never issued a <br />building permit for his building. <br />Birch suggested that the property owners might have to <br />get together an hire an attorney and sue to City in <br />order to force the City to do something. Birch stated <br />that he bought his property with a road in front and he <br />assumed that road was the City's. <br />Blesener suggested if the property owners are not <br />expecting to pay for the road, then they had better do <br />something. <br />A property owner asked the City Engineer his experience <br />with roads in similar soils. <br />The City Engineer replied that his firm has built roads <br />over peat areas, however, this situation is more <br />complicated because the area is already developed. <br />Typically, he would like to see the roads higher, but <br />options are limited in this case because of the <br />existing development. The Engineer suggested that if <br />the street had been developed properly, it would have <br />been so costly that the area would not have been <br />developed. <br />A property owner pointed out the County's process for <br />grinding down existing roads, installing fabric and <br />overlaying. Once this is done, the County usually <br />increases the weight limits. <br />The City Engineer replied that in these cases there is <br />some road surface there to grind and a base under the <br />road surface. In the case of the Ryan Industrial Park <br />streets, there is nothing to start with. <br />Germer asked about a 5 -ton versus 9 -ton road. <br />The City Engineer replied that the roads are being used <br />as 9 -ton roads. The Engineer stated that it is <br />important to design the roadway to handle the loading. <br />Options A and B are designed for heavy traffic, <br />however, Option C is not. <br />Frattalone stated that he thinks Option B is the way to <br />go. Frattalone felt that Option B would result in a <br />pretty good road that would last much longer than the <br />Engineer's estimates. <br />The City Engineer suggested that if the City bonded for <br />the improvement, under Option C assessments would be <br />Page 13 <br />Page 19 <br />