Laserfiche WebLink
:0, LITTLE CAN DA ROAD <br />SUITE :n0 <br />SAIxr P\CL <br />MINNESOTA 55111 <br />T E L . 61 : lon o_ n <br />F {x. n12 + (101 Y.DS <br />PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS <br />INCORPORATED <br />Coronet Development <br />REPORTED TOMr. Henry Vote! <br />P 0 Box 10826 <br />St Paul, MN 55110 <br />PROJECT <br />DATE. : <br />INTRODUCTION <br />Proposed Residence <br />Lots 38 -40, R -12 <br />North Heights <br />Little Canada, MN <br />March 11. 1993 <br />1'EC #8203 <br />This report concerns our recent subsurface exploration and <br />geotechnical review related to proposed house construction on the <br />captioned property in Little Canada, Minnesota. We understand the <br />local building officials have indicated that an unknown depth of <br />fill is probably situated at the surface on this lot. Accordingly, <br />subsurface exploration and related geotechnical review was <br />required. <br />Scope_ of Wort: - <br />In accordance with our proposal dated February 22, 1993. and your <br />subsequent authorization to proceed, we have performed a <br />geotechnical exploration program. The scope of our work for the <br />referenced project was as follows: <br />1. Explore the subsurface soil and groundwater conditions by <br />means-of two standard penetration test borings. <br />?. Prepare a written report which includes the followings items: <br />a. The results of the borings and groundwater readings. <br />b. A sketch showing the approximate boring locations. <br />c. Recommendations for building grading procedures. <br />d. Recommended soil bearing pressures and estimates of <br />potential foundation settlements. <br />e. Recommendations for support of on -grade floor slabs. <br />f. Recommendations for exterior backfill against below grade <br />walls and groundwater control. <br />Our scope of services was intended for geotechnical purposes only <br />and was not intended to determine the extent or presence of <br />environmental contamination, or to perform an environmental <br />assessment of the site. However, we can state that no contaminants <br />were detected in the retrieved soil samples as could be easily <br />identified by color or odor using normal human senses. <br />Paae 48 <br />