My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-21-1994 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1994
>
12-21-1994 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2014 2:41:21 PM
Creation date
10/9/2013 1:29:25 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
221
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />DECEMBER 7, 1994 <br />discussion on this issue and decided that similar to <br />what other cities are doing, no minimum setback should <br />be established for boundary line fences. <br />The Commission agreed. <br />Mr. DeLonais recommended adoption of the ordinance <br />amending Section 903.020, Subd. F., 2. of the Zoning <br />Code of the Municipal Code of the City of Little <br />Canada, regarding the location of boundary line fences <br />as presented by the City Planner. <br />Motion seconded by Davison. <br />Motion carried 4 - 0. <br />The City Planner reported that the Council also <br />discussed the issue of screening requirements for <br />commercial /industrial fences abutting residential <br />properties. The Planner reported that while the fence <br />ordinance is somewhat vague on this issue, it is <br />addressed in the City's landscape ordinance. That <br />ordinance requires commercial /industrial properties to <br />screen from adjacent residential properties with a <br />solid wood or masonry fence. Chain -link fencing with <br />slats is not an adequate screen. <br />The Commission discussed minimum and maximum fence <br />heights. The Planner pointed out that the maximum is 8 <br />feet in height. The Code sets no minimum height <br />requirements, and gives the City authority to dictate <br />minimum heights on a case -by -case basis. The Planner <br />felt that establishing a minimum height would result in <br />everyone proposing only the minimum and the City then <br />being forced to justify why a higher fence is <br />necessary. <br />A resident asked if the fence ordinance applied only to <br />new construction. <br />The City Planner replied that the ordinance applied to <br />new construction as well as existing fencing should the <br />property owner make a proposal to remodel the property <br />or make significant changes. At that time the City has <br />the authority to require that the site be brought into <br />conformance with current standards. <br />5 <br />Page 51 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.