My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-21-1994 Council Workshop Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1994
>
03-21-1994 Council Workshop Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2013 2:28:28 PM
Creation date
10/9/2013 2:27:28 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
515 Little Canada Road, Little Canada, MN 55117 -1600 <br />(612) 484 -2177 / FAX: (612) 484 -4538 <br />MEMORANDUM <br />TO: Mayor Hanson & Members of the City Council <br />FROM: Joel Hanson, City Administrator <br />DATE: March 18, 1994 <br />RE: Workshop to Review Street Assessment Policy <br />MAYOR <br />Raymond G. Hanson <br />COUNCIL <br />Beverly Scalze <br />Jim LaValle <br />Steve Morelan <br />Bob Pedersen <br />ADMINISTRATOR <br />Joel R. Hanson <br />Enclosed for your review is a copy of the street assessment <br />policy we adopted in 1993. Also attached is the survey <br />information we obtained regarding assessment practices for <br />overlays and rehabilitated streets. Based on this information as <br />well as questions raised from the utilization of the policy in <br />1993, I feel the following areas should be addressed: <br />* Page 6 - E.1. ,Rehabilitated /Reconstructed Rural <br />Streets <br />Presently, the policy calls for 100% of the costs to be <br />assessed in this type of project. Based on the survey <br />information, we may want to evaluate that. My opinion <br />is we would prefer to see streets upgraded to urban <br />sections. Therefore, the assessment rate of 100% <br />should be maintained in order that we not create an <br />inappropriate incentive to perpetuate rural streets. <br />* Page 6 - E.2. Upgraded Rural Streets <br />For residential streets, we are assessing 85% of an <br />8 "/3" section to a maximum width of 30 feet. This <br />policy seemed to work fairly well in 1993. However, <br />the estimated cost of Lake Street improvements still <br />seems to be higher than what one would deem reasonable. <br />Do we want to consider lowering that percentage? <br />* Page 7 - E.3. Rehabilitated Urban Streets <br />Again, we are assessing 100% of the project costs to <br />affected properties. As was noted in survey results, <br />once a property owner has paid for the construction of <br />an urban street, many cities do not have them pay <br />again. While I do not know that we can afford that <br />practice, I do feel that assessing 100% of the costs <br />Page 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.