Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />DECEMBER 18, 2013 <br />PLAN - <br />PUBLIC WORKS/ <br />PARKS <br />FACILITY <br />Improvement Plan Bonds for construction of a new Public Works /Parks <br />Facility on the property located at 2858 Centerville Road. Estimated <br />construction costs are $2,570,000. Ruff explained that State Statute <br />475.521 provides the City with the authority to issue these G.O. Capital <br />Improvement Plan Bonds for facilities such as city halls, public safety <br />buildings, public works buildings, and libraries without holding a <br />referendum. The Statute provides for a process, however, which includes <br />a 30 day waiting period after this hearing during which a qualified petition <br />can be presented to the Council which would require that the matter be put <br />on the ballot. Ruff reported that if that were to occur, the Council could <br />still move forward with other financing methods for this project. Ruff <br />noted, however, that it was felt that the G.O. Capital Improvement Plan <br />Bond provides the City with more flexibility. He also noted that the plan <br />is that debt service payments would be made from sewer and water funds <br />as well as cash -on -hand. <br />Ruff indicated that if this financing option moves forward, the plan would <br />be to sell the G.O. Capital Improvement Plan Bond at the Council's first <br />meeting in February. He noted that interest rates are very low, and <br />anticipated a bond sale at a low 3% figure. Ruff reported that the G.O. <br />Capital Improvement Bonds have some limitations, noting that the bonds <br />would count against the City's debt limit. The City has a debt limit of 3 %, <br />or $23 million. Ruff pointed out that Little Canada has very little debt, so <br />the $2,750,000 is only utilizing 10% to 15% of the City debt limit. <br />Ruff summarized the process which includes conducting the hearing this <br />evening, passing the resolution before the Council for preliminary <br />approval of the G.O. Capital Improvement Plan Bonds and adopting a <br />Capital Improvement Plan, waiting 30 days to determine whether or not a <br />reverse referendum petition will be submitted. If a petition is not received, <br />the sale of the bonds is anticipated to occur at the first meeting in <br />February. <br />Ruff then reviewed the Capital Improvement Plan that is a part of this <br />process, noting that it was prepared by his office and City staff. Ruff <br />indicated that as part of this plan, the State wants consideration of several <br />issues including the ability to share facilities, operating costs, etc. Ruff <br />pointed out that a good deal of thought and planning has been done as part <br />of the decision to move forward with this project. <br />Blesener noted that if this bond sale results in a petition for a reverse <br />referendum, the City has other options to finance the project. Ruff <br />reported that that was correct. He noted that the City could pay for the <br />project with cash, or it could use a combination of cash and sewer and <br />water bonds which are not subject to a reverse referendum. Blesener <br />2 <br />