07-26-1995 Council Agenda - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES CITY COUNCIL JUNE 28, 1995 house into an existing neighborhood in the conditional use section of the Zoning Ordinance was more appropriate than adopting an infill ordinance. Scalze pointed out that this would direct the process to the Planning Commission and City Council rather than staff. There was no one from the general public present wishing to comment on this matter. Upon motion by LaValle, seconded by Pedersen, the public hearing was closed. Morelan suggested that the Council deny the proposed infill ordinance and call a public hearing to consider amending the conditional use permit section of the Zoning Ordinance. Scalze agreed, but questioned putting the burden of proof on the applicant. Fahey felt that the applicant should be required to establish clear and convincing evidence that the standards of the ordinance have been met. Fahey pointed out that this proof could also come from other sources, such as the City Planner's findings, recommendations of staff, etc. Mr. Morelan introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 95 -6 -156 - DENYING THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO SECTION 903.020 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING AN ADMINISTRATIVE DESIGN REVIEW PROCEDURE AND DESIGN STANDARDS FOR INFILL RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Scalze. Ayes (5) Morelan, Scalze, Pedersen, Fahey, LaValle. Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. Mr. Morelan introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 95 -6 -157 - CALLING A PUBLIC HEARING FOR JULY 26, 1995 AT 7:30 P.M. TO CONSIDER AMENDING SECTION 921 OF THE ZONING CODE RELATIVE TO PROCESSING OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATIONS AS RECOMMENDED BY CITY STAFF AND INCLUDING THE REQUIREMENT OF SUBMISSION BY THE APPLICANT OF CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE THAT THE STANDARDS OF THE ORDINANCE ARE BEING MET 3 Page 24