My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-25-1995 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
01-25-1995 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2014 2:20:44 PM
Creation date
1/10/2014 2:18:28 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
145
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
515 Little Canada Road, Little Canada, MN 55117 -1600 <br />(612) 484 -2177 / FAX: (612) 484 -4538 <br />January 18, 1995 <br />TO: Mayor Fahey and Members of the City Council <br />FROM: Joel R. Hanson, City Administrator <br />RE: Dianna Lane Retaining Wall <br />MAYOR <br />Michael 1. Fahey <br />COUNCIL <br />Beverly Sealze <br />Jim LaValle <br />Steve Morelan <br />Bob Pedersen <br />ADMINISTRATOR <br />Joel R. Hanson <br />Since the last meeting the following information has been <br />obtained regarding this topic: <br />1. Memo from the City Engineer's office indicating that there <br />is no Code requirement, including OSHA, which requires <br />construction of a fence on top of a retaining wall. The <br />Building Inspector also stated that there is no building <br />code requirement for this fence. <br />2. A petition from the residents of Dianna Lane and Reidmond <br />Avenue requesting the construction of a key stone retaining <br />wall rather than one -to -one slope. This petition was <br />circulated by Mr. Swanson who was at our last meeting. <br />Twenty -four out of thirty -four property owners signed the <br />petition. <br />3. A letter from Mr. Jagadish Desai stating his opinion on this <br />matter. <br />Also attached for the Council's review is the Park Consultant's <br />report dated December 7, 1994, as well as the City Engineer's <br />drawings showing the one -to -one slope. <br />It appears the consensus of the neighborhood is to construct the <br />key stone wall. If the City Council decides to proceed in that <br />manner, the issue of the fence at the top of the wall can be <br />addressed in the design phase. If safety does not require its <br />presence, it could be eliminated to improve aesthetics. <br />The Council will have to decide whether the key stone wall or the <br />one -to -one slope should be constructed. Staff feels a one -to -one <br />slope is a workable solution and results in less cost to the <br />City. However, the neighborhood favors the key stone wall <br />option. <br />cc: Curtis Swanson <br />Jagadish Desai <br />Karen Johnson <br />Page 123 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.