My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-26-1995 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
04-26-1995 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2014 10:31:02 AM
Creation date
2/12/2014 2:55:39 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
111
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RECER'E a APB, 2 i t3C1 <br />The Gregers <br />107 Australian Ave <br />Little Canada , MN 55117 <br />April 19, 1995 <br />To : Little Canada City Council and Staff <br />Re: Purposed Street Construction for Tima Property Division <br />Dear council members and staff: <br />We have several concerns about the street being considered by the council with little regard to the <br />desires of the overwhelming majority of affected residents. A partial list of these concerns <br />follows: <br />1.) Safety for neighborhood children. Over the years the children have become accustomed to <br />the quite avenues. With the addition of a connecting street they will have to contend with a <br />greater number of faster moving vehicles. The risk of child abduction will also be increased. <br />2.) Safety for property. A connecting street allows for a faster getaway from a crime scene, <br />making a previously less desirable area to criminals a new untapped resource. <br />3.) Placement of pedestrian path on a 40 foot wide road easement. With only 30 feet paved an <br />8 foot path does not allow much remaining room for two way traffic and parked cars. <br />4.) Shortened life of both Australian and Bluwood avenues. The increased traffic will <br />ultimately increase the cost to the residence of these avenues through assessments and increase <br />taxes city wide for additional road repair. <br />5.) The extreme steps taken to accommodate one property owner at the expense of all the others. <br />This street addition benefits only one property owner and bypasses city requirements for new <br />street construction to do so. If city requirements for streets mean so little, why do we have them? <br />6.) Property assessments. Since the city administrator has explained that the city has to bear <br />much of the responsibility for the current situation with the avenues, will the city pay for all <br />changes made? Will the lone property owner to benefit be responsible for all the cost which the <br />city does not cover for the changes made? <br />The city should be able to work up a compromise with Mr. Tima as to his property split without <br />affecting the surrounding neighbors. Any property needed to make this split should come from <br />the party requesting the split. <br />An alternative which is workable and nonintrusive to all of the adjacent property owners would <br />be as such: <br />Australian Avenue: Leave as is until the entire avenue needs to be replaced. A driveway can be <br />placed at any of many workable points on the end of the avenue. At the necessary time replace <br />the pavement and pave the end of the avenue to allow for snow removal and expanded <br />turnaround. <br />Bluwood Avenue: Leave as is until the life of the current road surface expires. A driveway can <br />Page 48 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.