My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-13-1995 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
06-13-1995 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2014 8:19:37 AM
Creation date
2/13/2014 8:18:07 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Again, the Planner indicated that the Water Department <br />is asking the City what kind of development it would <br />like to see occur on the sites so that the properties <br />can be marketed in that manner. <br />Keis recommended that the Rice Street site owned by the <br />St. Paul Water Department be rezoned to PUD with an <br />office development designation in the Land Use Plan. <br />Motion seconded by Carson. <br />Motion carried 6 - 0. <br />Keis stated that given the limited access to the Spruce <br />Street site, he would have no problem retaining the B -3 <br />zoning of the site, or rezoning to Industrial. <br />The Planner pointed out that the property to the east <br />is zoned I -P District. <br />Knudsen pointed out the freeway access and surrounding <br />property usage; therefore, felt the Spruce Street site <br />was a good Industrial piece of property. Knudsen sis <br />not feel it realistic to expect regional commercial <br />development to occur on this site. <br />Keis stated that he worried about access to the site. <br />The Planner pointed out that Spruce Street is a fully <br />developed industrial street. The Planner did not <br />believe a developer would propose an office building <br />for this site. <br />Knudsen suggested that an upscale industrial <br />development would be good. <br />The Planner stated that this would involve the <br />extension of the I -P District. <br />Garske asked if the Park & Recreation Commission were <br />interested in developing either site as park. <br />The Administrative Assistant reported that the Park & <br />Recreation Commission has reviewed the matter, and is <br />recommending trail development around the wetland <br />either at the time the sites are developed, through a <br />dedication of trail area by the Water Department. <br />Keis asked if the Commission members cared if the site <br />were zoned B -3 or Industrial. <br />Page 41 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.