My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-10-2014 Planning Comm. Agenda
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
04-10-2014 Planning Comm. Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/4/2014 1:32:27 PM
Creation date
4/4/2014 1:30:16 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The applicants cite some examples of parcels which are zoned R -1, but used for two - <br />family homes. One of these is along Twin Lake Boulevard, north of 1 -694, not in a <br />nearby neighborhood. Two others along the west side of Ruth Street are both identified <br />in the Ramsey County property records as being single family homes. The closest <br />example is at the northeast corner of Demont and Ruth Street, about 2 blocks east of <br />the subject property. That parcel (along with all of the parcels to the north on the east <br />side of Ruth Street, are zoned R -2. <br />The applicants also noted that the structure, from the time of its remodeling in 1977, has <br />been constructed to be operated as two separate dwellings, with separate entrances, <br />driveways, and living facilities. The property itself is a "walkout" lot facing to the south — <br />the downstairs unit gains access from the south, and the upstairs unit gains its access <br />at grade from the east side of the building. The lower unit has a "tuck- under" garage, <br />whereas the upper unit does not have enclosed parking. <br />The applicants suggest that re- occupying the structure as a duplex would be consistent <br />with Comprehensive Plan goals of meeting housing count growth projections and <br />facilitating mixed -use land use patterns. However, the Comprehensive Plan also <br />includes goals and policies that are intended to provide for the protection and <br />preservation of single family neighborhoods. <br />The most applicable requirement of the standards listed above would be item 2, <br />requiring compatibility with present and future land uses. To rezone the property as an <br />R -2 parcel would raise issues of compatibility with the surrounding zoning, which consist <br />of R -1 and Public zoning within one to two blocks in all directions. Although the duplex <br />existed on the property for several years, the City's zoning amendments in the 1980s <br />made it clear that duplexes were not considered to be compatible in single family <br />neighborhoods. As such, it would appear that the rezoning is not supported by the <br />zoning ordinance. <br />Summary and Recommendation <br />Staff does not recommend approval of the rezoning. Given the City's zoning ordinance <br />history, the eventual conversion of any remaining two - family structures in the R -1 <br />District has been the long- standing goal of the City. Moreover, rezoning this parcel to <br />R -2 out of the surrounding R -1 zoning area would raise issues of spot zoning and <br />incompatibility. <br />pc: Kathy Glanzer <br />Steve Westerhaus <br />Lee Elfering <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.