Laserfiche WebLink
From: Patrick J. Kelly [mailto:pkellv(a kellyandlemmons.com] <br />Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 5:01 PM <br />To: jvanvalkenburgnagertenvanv.com <br />Cc: Joel Hanson <br />Subject: Fra -Dor, Inc. Aggregate Stockpiling and Recycling Agreement <br />Dear Mr. Van Valkenburg: <br />Please be advised that we represent the City of Little Canada. Mr. Frattalone has forwarded your comments of April 30, <br />2014 to Mr. Joel Hanson, City Administrator of Little Canada. <br />The City of Little Canada has always had a positive working relationship with Mr. Frattalone's companies and they <br />believe in a positive working relationship. For purposes of clarification and completion of the Interim Use Permit, Mr. <br />Hanson would like to discuss the following with Mr. Frattalone: <br />1. Paragraph 16. As you know, erosion plants are important and rules and regulations change over time. A <br />discussion would clarify Mr. Frattalone's concern of requesting the deletion. <br />2. Paragraph 18. Your suggestion is accepted. <br />3. Paragraph 19. Mr. Hanson would like a discussion concerning the change. <br />4. Paragraph 25. Mr. Hanson would like to know the rationale of changing 4 feet to 6 feet. <br />5. Paragraph 27. Your suggestion is accepted. <br />6. Paragraph 30. Material is a source of litigation. Please advise as to the rationale for the suggested term. The <br />final sentence with the addition of "reasonable" is accepted. <br />7. Paragraph 32. Please find herein a copy of the Performance Bond and I believe we do not have an insurance <br />policy. Please note that I have suggested that we enter a new five year Interim Use Permit and consider the <br />last Interim Use Permit a de facto. <br />8. Paragraph 35. Additional language that would indicate, "If the owner cannot correct the deficiency or <br />breach within 48 hours due to circumstances beyond his control, then the Owner submit a plan that is <br />acceptable to the City with a timeline." <br />9. Paragraph 36. The City would like a discussion as to the rationale for the change. <br />10. Paragraph 39. Again, the material breach is an issue. Please advise as to the definition. <br />Finally, I have no problem with Mr. Frattalone speaking with Mr. Hanson on addressing these issues. They have always <br />had a good working relationship with respect to their interests. We would also appreciate an appraisal, a copy of the <br />listing agreement with the proposed price and per the de facto agreement, we would like the six month reporting <br />requirements, if possible. Mr. Frattalone can discuss this with Mr. Hanson. If agreeable, Mr. Frattalone can contact Mr. <br />Hanson directly to set up a meeting. <br />If you have questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you. <br />Respectfully, <br />Patrick J. Kelly <br />Attorney at Law <br />Kelly & Lemmons, P.A. <br />223 Little Canada Road East <br />Suite 200 <br />Little Canada, MN 55117 <br />651-361-8301 (DIRECT) <br />651-224-3781 (MAIN) <br />651-223-8019 (FAX) <br />18 <br />