My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-18-2014 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
08-18-2014 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2014 11:46:56 AM
Creation date
8/18/2014 11:40:54 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. <br />4800 Olson Metnorial Highway, Suite 202. Golden Valley, MN 56422 <br />Telephone: 763.231.2555 Facsimile: 763.231.2661 plannersCrJnacplanning.com <br />MEMORANDUM <br />TO: Little Canada Planning Commission <br />FROM: Stephen Grittman <br />DATE: August 8, 2014 <br />RE: Little Canada — Kaposia Sign Design Exception <br />FILE NO: 758.09 — <br />Background and Analysis <br />Kaposia, a tenant in the London Square office complex at 223 Little Canada Road, is <br />seeking an exception to the Architectural Guidelines requirements related to the <br />prohibition against white -background signs. The purpose of this provision is to limit the <br />impact of sign glare to public streets and other neighboring properties. <br />The glare problem is most prevalent along Rice Street where several freestanding signs <br />had been constructed over the years with internally lit sign cabinets that were <br />dominated by white backgrounds and limited message area — the strong glare interferes <br />with general visibility in the corridor, and in many cases, makes the sign messages <br />unreadable. As a result, the Architectural Guidelines were written, and have been <br />enforced routinely now for several years, to require that new signs be designed to <br />"reverse out" the message from a dark background. <br />The proposed Kaposia sign is a 6 square foot wall sign on a comer of the office <br />complex that is not visible from the street — only the parking area serving the facility. <br />Moreover, the sign is a metal panel structure that is not lit, either internally or externally. <br />In both of these ways, the sign is not typical of the signs which the guidelines were <br />intended to address. In addition, the City has approved other signs that have white <br />backgrounds but which did not illuminate the white areas of the sign. As such, it would <br />be reasonable to consider this sign for an exception to the Architectural Guidelines sign <br />design criteria. <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.