Laserfiche WebLink
also used a transfer of $81,520 from Water/Sewer Capital Replacement Account that will offset by a <br />debt levy of the same amount to be used for the new Public Works Building. <br />You will also remember that in our scenario discussions, we utilized assumed expense increases of <br />3% for all costs except police and fire which were estimated at 4%. Overall, General Fund expenses <br />ended up at 3.93%. Some of the expense increase drivers are as follows: <br />• Mayor & Council Salaries up pending final decision on increase (+5,080). <br />• Attorney Prosecution Costs increasing per approval earlier this year (+$13,096 from 2014 <br />Budget and +7,346 from 2014 Actual). <br />• Election down (-10,955) due to a non -election year. <br />• Planner's Costs up for additional assistance on for special projects based on recent history <br />(+7,000). <br />• Sheriff's Department Budget shows increase of 9.2% but that is because we deducted the <br />departmental revenue from the amount shown here and added it as a revenue item in the <br />General Fund ($65,732) per the auditor's direction. Their net increase for the operating <br />budget is 3.83% or $44,325. We did pick up some additional Power Shift car costs (formerly <br />Rice Street Corridor Car) based on historical utilization. This amounted to an increase of <br />about $3,300 in 2015 and additional $3,300 in 2016. <br />• Dispatch costs (police & fire) are $2,693 or 4.1% <br />• Fire Department Operating budget up 5.35% (+17,012) <br />• Animal Control up 37.31% or $1,250 due to historical costs with hoarding since the change to <br />the RCSD providing the service <br />• In Streets, no big changes except to note that sealcoating was not done in 2014. It was <br />decided to forego the program in 2014 due to conflicts with the Little Canada Road area due <br />to the Veterans Memorial work on the parking bay. <br />• Storm Sewer is proposed at a 20.16% increase (+1,875) due to higher actual supply and utility <br />costs the past couple of years given higher rainfall amounts. <br />• From a salary perspective, we budgeted 2% for Department Heads and 2.5% for other <br />permanent employees with a couple of scale adjustments for positions lagging the market. <br />(More discussion will occur at a future workshop on this subject.) <br />If the Council desires to lower the levy, here are some quick options staff developed: <br />• $5,000 additional transfer from CATV to General Fund ($30,000 to $35,000) <br />• Use additional LOA at an amount of your choosing. For reference purposes, we have <br />$231,628 in the General Capital Improvement Fund. We also received an additional $33,704 <br />in 2015. Note: This option is in conflict with reducing our reliance on LGA in the General <br />Fund. <br />• Set a lower number for certification purposes and direct staff to continue evaluating the <br />budget for additional opportunities prior to final adoption. Our fallback position would be <br />more LGA use as a worse case. <br />C: \ Users \ kalliy.glanzeMppData\I,ocal\Microsoft\WindowsVremporary 1mcrnet Files \Conlent.OmlooAKP111020\2015 Preliminary Budget Memo -9 <br />18 14 .doex <br />