My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-08-2014 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
10-08-2014 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/3/2014 3:50:26 PM
Creation date
10/3/2014 3:47:29 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
inflationary adjustment to the benefit level is applied to every year of service for each <br />fire fighter unlike a COLA on wages that only apply to the current year). <br />• Fire State Aid will be based on the most recent past year's receipt. We will need to <br />ensure that the supplemental aid that we are to start receiving this year continues <br />beyond the 10 year sunset provision (this may be only 9 years in our case due to a <br />legislative snafu). <br />• We need to agree on an assumed rate of return for investments. State law allows a 5% <br />assumption. However, our Relief Association has earned 2.4% over the last five years, <br />5.2% over the last 10 years, and 4.2% over the last 15 years. The Fire Department <br />thinks we should use the 5% assumption and we felt we should adjust it annually based <br />on the most recent 15 -year return as calculated by the State Auditor's Office with a cap <br />of 5%. <br />• The calculation for future benefit increases would only be done once per year at an <br />agreed upon date. Discussion focused on October 1 S` but that could change. <br />• Past formulas have also provided for the most senior two members retiring in the first <br />year of the projections and then the most senior person remaining each year after. The <br />projections have looked out five years. This item was not discussed in great detail. <br />• Past formulas have used administrative costs for the projections based on the most <br />current year's actual numbers. This was not discussed. (Note: I have attached a <br />projection sheet that we have used in these discussions.) <br />• There would need to be "outs" for both parties if the agreement was not producing the <br />desired results. For us that would be levies greater than what we had agreed to or a <br />financial crisis that forced us to look at all expenditures. <br />There are many more variables at play that we can talk about Wednesday night. However, the <br />above bullet points seem to be the focal points of current discussions and the Committee <br />wanted the input of the full Council before proceeding. <br />One other item of note is the Council Member McGraw has been substituting for Mayor <br />Blesener at the Mayor's request. He has done an excellent job getting up to speed on this <br />difficult issue. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.