Laserfiche WebLink
RELEVANT LINKS: <br />Slat. @ 65,\.50, su0d. 6. <br />I nm. Slat. $ 65A50, suhct. 6. <br />Mimi Stat. $ o5.\.3U..ub(I. 0 <br />hl inn. Stitt, 0, :111)(I <br />b. Releasing funds to the insured <br />There are two situations described in statute where the Muds in the account <br />must be immediately forwarded to the insured. The first situation is where <br />the chief fire official or other authorized city representative receives or is <br />shown reasonable proof that the damaged or destroyed portions of the <br />insured structure have been repaired or replaced. However, if not all repairs <br />or replacement have been made, the city may withhold the amount that is <br />needed to complete repair or replacement. <br />The second situation is when the chief fire official or other authorized city <br />representative receives or is shown reasonable proof that the damaged or <br />destroyed structure and any and all remnants of the structure have been <br />removed from the land where the structure was located. This may be done <br />by the owner or any other person. The work must have been done in <br />compliance with local code requirements. <br />There is also a third situation when funds must be immediately released, but <br />in this situation, the funds are forwarded to a third -party contractor and not <br />the insured. in this situation, the funds deposited into the escrow or trust <br />account must be immediately forwarded to the contractor when the chief fire <br />official or other authorized city representative receives or is shown <br />reasonable proof that the insured has entered into a contract to perform <br />repair, replacement, or removal services on the property. It must also be <br />shown that the insured consents to payment of the funds directly to the <br />contractor performing the services. These funds may be forwarded only to a <br />contractor performing services on the insured property. <br />As mentioned in the three situations above, the insured must show <br />reasonable proof in order to have the funds released or forwarded. The law <br />provides three situations that will be considered reasonable proof: <br />a Originals or copies of pertinent contracts, invoices, receipts, and other <br />similar papers showing both the work performed or to be performed and <br />the materials used or to be used by all contractors performing repair, <br />replacement, or removal services with respect to the insured real <br />property. <br />An affidavit executed by the contractor who has performed the greatest <br />amount of repair or replacement work on the structure, or who has done <br />most of the clearing and removal work if structure repair or replacement <br />is not to be performed. The contractor shall attach to the affidavit all <br />pertinent contracts, invoices, and receipts and shall swear that these <br />attached papers correctly indicate the nature and extent of the work <br />performed to date by the contractor and the materials used. <br />e An inspection of the insured real property to verify that repair, <br />replacement, or clearing has been completed. <br />League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: <br />Dangerous Properties <br />8 <br />624/2013 <br />Page 9 <br />