02-25-2015 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

RELEVANT LINKS: Minn. Stat. 131.06, subd. 4. Minn. Stat. § 131.06, subd. 4 (d). Coalwell v. Murray, No. C6-95-2436 (Minn. Ct. App. Aug. 6, 1996) (unpublished decision). Elseth n. Hine, No. Al2-1496 (Minn. Ct. App. May 13, 2013) (unpublished opinion). Minn. Stat. § 131.06, subd. 3. Claude v. Collins, 518 N.W.2d 836 (Minn. 1994). Brown v. Cannon Falls Township, 723 N.W.2d 31 (Minn. Ct. App. 2006). Minn. Stat. § 1319.06, subd. 3 (b) and (c). Ouast v. Knutson, 276 Minn. 340, 150 N.W.2d 199 (Minn. 1967). Sullivan V. Credit River Township, 217 N.W.2d 502 (Minn. 1974). In re D & A Truck Line, Inc., 524 N.W.2d 1 (Minn. 0. App. 1994). Lac Qui Rade-Yellow Bank Watershed Dist. v. Wollschlager, No. 06-96- 1023 (Minn. Ct. App. Nov. 12, 1996) (unpublished decision). IPAD 11-004. If a plaintiff prevails in a lawsuit under the open meeting law, an award of reasonable attorney fees is mandatory if the court determines the public body was the subject of a prior written advisory opinion from the commissioner of the Department of Administration, and the court finds that the opinion is directly related to the lawsuit and that the public body did not act in conformity with the opinion. A court is required to give deference to the advisory opinion in a lawsuit brought to determine whether the open meeting law was violated. No monetary penalties or attorney fees may be awarded against a member of a public body unless the court finds there was intent to violate the open meeting law. If a person is found to have intentionally violated this chapter in three or more separate actions, the person must be removed from office and may not serve in any other capacity with that public body for a period of time equal to the term of office the person was serving. If a court finds a separate, third violation that is unrelated to the previous violations, it must declare the position vacant and notify the appointing authority or clerk of the governing body. As soon as practicable, the appointing authority or governing body shall fill the position as in the case of any other vacancy. The open meeting law does not address whether actions taken at an improper meeting would be invalid. The Minnesota Supreme Court once held that an attempted school district consolidation was fatally defective when the initiating resolution was adopted at a meeting that was not open to the public. However, in more recent decisions, Minnesota courts have refused to invalidate actions taken at improperly closed meetings. The Minnesota Supreme Court has noted that the open meeting law "does not specify that actions taken at a meeting which is not public shall be invalid." 111. • procedures A. Agendas The city clerk generall .,•' :':res an agen.a ": ncil meetings. The agenda is the !' "` to councilmembers and other in , . individuals suc " ,artment heads and citizens. League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: Meetings of City Councils Page 23 11/14/2014