Laserfiche WebLink
RELEVANT LINKS: <br />Minn. Stat. § 471.87. <br />A.G. Op. 470 (June 9, 1967). <br />A.G. Op. 90-E-5 (Nov. 13, <br />1969). <br />A.G. Op. 90e-6 (June 15, <br />1988). <br />A.G. Op. 90e-6 (June 15, <br />1988). <br />Minn. Stat. § 412.311. <br />Section IV -A-2, Exceptions <br />and procedures. <br />Singewald c. Minneapolis <br />Gas Co., 274 Minn. 556, 142 <br />N.W.2d 739 (1966). <br />A.G. Op. 90a-1 (Oct. 7, <br />1976). <br />Handbook, Chapter 4. <br />Minn. Stat. § 471.881. <br />A. Contracts <br />1. General prohibition <br />Public officers are generally prohibited from having a personal financial <br />interest in a sale, lease or contract they are authorized to make in their <br />official capacity. The term "public officer" certainly includes mayors, <br />councilmembers, or other elected officials. It may also include appointed <br />officers and employees who are able to influence the decision-making <br />process. <br />The attorney general has advised that the conflict of interest law applies to <br />any councilmember "who is authorized to take part in any manner" in the <br />making of the contract. Simply abstaining from voting on the contract is <br />not sufficient. The attorney general reasoned that if the Legislature had <br />only wanted to prohibit interested officers from voting on the contract, it <br />would not have used the word "authorized." <br />A literal reading of the statute might suggest that it only applies to city <br />officers who enter into contracts on behalf of the city. However, the <br />attorney general has given the statute a broader interpretation, which could <br />affect more officials than just those who are directly involved in the <br />decision-making process. As a result, it may be wise to take a conservative <br />approach regarding contracts with any city official. <br />a. Statutory cities <br />Statutory cities must consider an additional restriction. No member of a <br />statutory city council may have a direct or indirect interest in any contract <br />the council makes (notwithstanding the limited exceptions discussed <br />below). This restriction may affect some contractual situations that are not <br />covered by the general prohibition. For example, even though the actual <br />contract is not made with a councilmember, the fact that he or she has an <br />indirect interest in it could be an issue. <br />b. Home rule charter cities <br />Many home rule charters contain provisions that address conflicts of <br />interest in contracts as well. Some charters go beyond the statute to <br />prevent all city officers and employees from having an interest in a city <br />contract, whether or not the individual has a role in the process. Because <br />charter provisions vary from city to city, they are not covered in this memo <br />in any detail. However, the exceptions discussed below apply to all cities, <br />regardless of any other statute or city charter provision to the contrary. <br />League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 10/17/2014 <br />Official Conflict of Interest Page 6 <br />