My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-25-2015 Council Packet
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
02-25-2015 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2015 9:34:46 AM
Creation date
2/23/2015 9:29:26 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
117
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RELEVANT LINKS: <br />A.G. Op. 90e (Aug. 25, <br />1997). <br />In one situation, the attorney general advised that a housing authority <br />commissioner had a conflict when—as a foreman—he would aid his <br />employer, a contractor, in making a bid to the housing authority. <br />In a different opinion, the attorney general found that a mayor or <br />councilmember would not be disqualified from office because he was an <br />employee of a nonprofit corporation that provided public access cable <br />service to the city, but must abstain from participating in any related <br />actions. <br />f. Land use <br />Since a city council must deal with land matters within its jurisdiction, it is <br />almost inevitable that such decisions will affect property owned or used by <br />one of its members. <br />(1) Property ownership <br />Whether or not property ownership disqualifies a councilmember from <br />participating in a land use decision will depend (to some extent) on the <br />nature of the decision and the numbers of persons or properties affected. <br />At one extreme is adoption of a new zoning ordinance (or a <br />comprehensive revision of an existing ordinance) that may impact all <br />property in the city. In this situation, the councilmember's interest is not <br />personal and he or she should be able to participate. If this was not <br />allowed, such ordinances might never be adopted. <br />At the other extreme is the application for a zoning variance or special use <br />permit that only applies to a councilmember's property. Such a specific, <br />personal interest will likely disqualify the member from participating in <br />the proceedings. However, the councilmember should still be able to <br />submit the required application to the city. <br />Between these two extremes are those proceedings affecting some lots or <br />parcels, one of which a councilmember owns. In such situations, it is a <br />question of fact whether the councilmember should not vote. In such <br />circumstances, the council must decide whether the member should be <br />disqualified—a decision which is subject to review in the courts if <br />challenged. In many situations where the right to vote is questioned, an <br />interested councilmember will refrain from participating in order to avoid <br />the "appearance" of impropriety. <br />League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 10/17/2014 <br />Official Conflict of Interest Page 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.