My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-25-2015 Council Packet
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
02-25-2015 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2015 9:34:46 AM
Creation date
2/23/2015 9:29:26 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
117
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RELEVANT LINKS: <br />Minn, Stat. § 13D.05, subd, <br />3(d). <br />Minn. Stat. § 13D.05, subd. <br />2(b), Minn. Stat. § 13.43, <br />subd. 2(4). <br />IPAD 03-020. <br />IPAD 14-004. <br />IPAD 10-001. <br />Minn. Stat, § 13.43. <br />Minn. Stat. § 13D,01, subd, 3. <br />Minn. Stat, § 13D,05, subd, I. <br />The following procedure must be used to close a meeting under this <br />exception: <br />• Before closing the meeting, the council must state on the record the <br />specific grounds for closing the meeting and describe the subject to be <br />discussed. <br />• When describing the subject to be discussed, the council must refer to <br />the facilities, systems, procedures, services or infrastructure to be <br />considered during the closed meeting. <br />• The closed meeting must be tape-recorded, and the recording must be <br />preserved for at least four years. <br />2. Meetings that must be closed <br />There are some meetings that the open meeting law requires to be closed. <br />The following meetings must be closed: <br />a. Misconduct allegations <br />A public body must close a meeting for preliminary consideration of <br />allegations or charges against an individual subject to the public body's <br />authority. <br />The commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Administration has <br />advised that a city could not close a meeting under this exception to consider <br />allegations of misconduct against ajob applicant who had been extended a <br />conditional offer of employment. (The job applicant was not a city <br />employee.) The commissioner reasoned that the city council had no <br />authority to discipline the job applicant or to direct his actions in any way; <br />therefore, he was not "an individual subject to its authority." <br />The commissioner has also advised that a tape recording of a closed meeting <br />for preliminary consideration of misconduct allegations is private personnel <br />data under Minn. Stat. § 13.43, subd. 4, and is accessible to the subject of <br />the data but not to the public. The commissioner noted that at some point in <br />time, some or all of the data on the tape may become public under Minn. <br />Stat. § 13.43, subd. 2. For example, if the employee is disciplined and there <br />is a final disposition, certain personnel data becomes public. <br />The following procedure must be used to close a meeting under this <br />exception: <br />• Before closing the meeting, the council must state on the record the <br />specific grounds for closing the meeting and describe the subject to be <br />discussed. <br />League of Minnesota Cities Information Menlo: 11/14/2014 <br />Meetings of City Councils Page 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.