My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-27-2015 Council Packet
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
05-27-2015 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/27/2015 1:36:49 PM
Creation date
5/27/2015 1:25:07 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
156
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City staff generally has the right to speak publicly as private citizens on "matters of public <br />concern," Such speech, even if made in the workplace or as part of official duties, may be <br />constitutionally protected -if the interests of the employee, in commenting upon matters ofpublic <br />concern, outweighs a city's interests in promoting the efficiency of the public services it performs <br />through its employees, Be eareful to balance these interests before taking any action against an <br />employee for the content of the speech he/she publicizes on social media sites, Of course, not <br />everything is defined as a matter of public concern — comments on private matters with no impact <br />on the greater public generally are not considered protected speech. Cities should consult with <br />their city attorneys as appropriate on this issue. Staff never has the right to reveal non-public or <br />private data, <br />Etiquette guidelines for staff who use social media on a personal basis might include: <br />• Account Names. Personal social media account names should be not be tied to the city, This <br />will help clarify that the individual is not speaking offiolally on behalfofthe city. for example, <br />the personal Twitter account for John Doe, the Mosquito Heights Public Works Director, <br />should be just "JohnDoe," his Facebook page "John Doe's" and so on. <br />Staff interested in using social media officially on behalfofthe city should talk with their <br />supervisor. <br />• Mind the law, existing city policies and guidelines. Individuals who use personal social <br />media accounts are not immune from the law, or from the need to follow existing city policies <br />and guidelines related to harassment prevention, media relations, computer use and other <br />policies the city may have adopted. <br />Individuals should be encouraged to refrain from uploading, posting, transmitting or making <br />available content known to be false, ►misleading or fraudulent. They should be encouraged not <br />to post photos that infringe on trademark, copyright or patent rights of others, <br />Individuals never have the right to post non-public and confidential information such as <br />information related to coworkers, personnel data, medical information, claims or lawsuits <br />against the city, <br />Individuals should not use city -owned equipment to post to personal sites content that violates <br />existing city policies, that exhibits hate, bias, discrimination, pornography, libelous or <br />otherwise defamatory content. <br />Individuals should be encouraged to post to personal sites only that content which is suitable <br />for readers and viewers of all ages, <br />What about elected officials who use social media? Some elected officials already use blogs, <br />microblogs, Faeebook and other social media to eonnect with constituents and to promote political <br />agendas. This is a reasonable use of social media, but elected officials should not use official city <br />social media sites for campaigning purposes, just as they would not use the official city website or <br />newsletter for campaigning. <br />Page 9 of 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.