Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />MARCH 14, 2007 <br />o Anticipated pressure based on demands from an average, <br />maximum, and/or peak day scenario. <br />o Available fire flow at any point in the system. <br />o Anticipated flow in any main at an average, maximum, <br />and/or peak day point. <br />The City Administrator noted that with this general system wide <br />information, the City would be able to run scenarios to determine the <br />effects of additions or modifications to water demands or piping network <br />of the system. Some scenario examples would be the effects of an <br />increase in water demand from a large user like Schroeder Milk or the <br />addition of a new business onto the system. <br />The Administrator noted that the City Engineer has provided a not to <br />exceed cost of $8,000. <br />Keis asked if once the modeling is done, the City Engineer will be <br />responsible for running the system reporting, or if Public Works will take <br />it over. The City Administrator replied that the City Engineer will likely <br />be responsible for operating the modeling system. However, there is the <br />potential for Public Works to take over and operate the system with proper <br />training and software. It was noted that the finished product will belong to <br />the City. <br />Keis asked if this will document the City's underground infrastructure. <br />The City Administrator replied that the City already has that information <br />digitized. This modeling system will measure system impacts. <br />Mr. McGraw introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO.2007-3-63 -APPROVING THE WATER <br />MODELING OF THE CITY'S WATERMAINSYSTEMAS <br />PROPOSED BY THE CITY ENGINEER AT A COST NOT TO <br />EXCEED $8,000 WITH THAT COST TO BE PAID FROM THE <br />WATER AND SEWER CAPITAL REPLACEMENT FUND <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Keis. <br />Ayes (4). <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />2007 The Finance Director appeared before the Council and reviewed her <br />SEWER & March 10°i report in detail relative to the 2007 Sewer and Water Budgets <br />WATER and rates. The Director began with a review of the Sewer Budget noting <br />BUDGETS/ that the 2006 budgeted income was $26,641 with rates remaining at the <br />RATES 2005 level. The actua12006 operations resulted in an estimated loss of <br />11 <br />