My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-14-07 Council Workshop Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
11-14-07 Council Workshop Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 1:24:11 PM
Creation date
4/23/2008 2:20:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />NOVEMBER 14, 2007 <br />McGraw pointed out that from his review of police call activity, it appears <br />that a lot of calls are generated by people passing through the City on the <br />freeways, as an example, rather than residents of the City. He noted that <br />this puts Little Canada under a pressure that other communities are not. <br />Keis asked if it were possible to increase fines to help defray the cost of <br />police protection. The Administrator noted that not only do hearing <br />officers tend to discount fines, but fine revenue is also divided between the <br />State, County, and City. Further, State-imposed surcharges are paid first <br />which also reduces fine revenues when judges do not impose fair fines. <br />Little Canada's fine revenue will be approximately $50,000 in 2007. The <br />Administrator noted that an alternative would be to enact administrative <br />fines; however, it appears there may be a constitutionality issue with doing <br />so. <br />The Administrator noted that there will be no change in the Sheriffls <br />Department's formula for the 2008 Budget. He just wanted the Council to <br />be aware of the issue for 2009 through 2011. <br />Montour pointed out that public safety is one of the key services that the <br />City provides, and noted that it will have to take precedence over other <br />services, if necessary. <br />The Administrator noted the additional traffic car that was put on during <br />the Unweave The Weave project. He suggested that this car has been a <br />good investment and that, if feasible, it should continue after the project <br />has been completed. <br />Keis pointed out that North Oaks has a community services off cer, and <br />asked if this was a less expensive alternative that Little Canada should <br />consider. The Administrator reported that a CSO could not replace the <br />traffic car. He indicated that North Oaks' CSO does some code <br />enforcement as well as security patrol and resolution of neighborhood <br />issues. Their CSO is on duty for 8 hours each day. The Administrator <br />pointed out that North Oaks does not have 24 hours per day Sheriff's <br />patrol. The CSO keeps a visible presence in their City for another 8 hours <br />each day. They feel the CSO has been a good investment. <br />McGraw asked about the crime prevention line item in the Sheriffls <br />Budget. The Administrator replied that these are the costs associated with <br />neighborhood watch, multi-family housing, residential and commercial <br />premises checks, etc. <br />The Finance Director reviewed staffls report relative to IRS mandated <br />changes to the City's Post Employment Health Savings Plan administered <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.