Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />FEBRUARY 14, 2007 <br />PROPERTY - for the parcel of property the City owns on Twin Lake Blvd., specifically <br />DEVELOPMENT the option for an assisted living facility. The Administrator reported that <br />OPTIONS there were seven people present from the neighborhood, and a variety of <br />opinions were expressed. While no one favored a townhome <br />development, some favored single-family with driveway access directly to <br />"Twin Lake Blvd. and others favored the assisted living concept that would <br />have access to Bankers Drive. The Administrator indicated that the <br />assisted living concept that was discussed would consist of approximately <br />40 to 45 units, one-story in height, and would disturb about one-third of <br />the site. Under the single-fatnily option, there would be the potential of 10 <br />to 12 single-family homes. <br />The Administrator indicated that he informed the neighborhood that it was <br />likely that the City would request proposals for all three options: single- <br />family, townhouse, and assisted living. Once proposals are received, a <br />meeting would be held with the neighborhood to review them. The <br />Administrator indicated that he also discussed with the neighborhood <br />current real estate market conditions, and that given these conditions, the <br />City may wait until improvement occurs before requesting proposals. <br />The Council discussed market conditions and felt while there was always <br />a market for assisted living development; current conditions were not <br />favorable for townhomes or single-family. Therefore, it would not be <br />prudent to request proposals for all three options at this time. The <br />consensus of the Council was to bring this matter back in late spring or <br />early summer for additional consideration. <br />The City Administrator pointed out that the City has completed the <br />topography information on the site, as well as done a tree survey and soil <br />testing. <br />VALOR The City Administrator reviewed the history of the Valor Enterprise <br />HAZARDOUS property relative to the City's revocation of Conditional Use Petmits <br />BUILDING and non-renewal of Auto Repair and Auto Sales Licenses in September <br />REPORT of 2006. The Administrator indicated that the property owner indicated in <br />November of 2006 his intent to reply for the Conditional Use Permits and <br />Licenses based on an improved business plan. At that point the City <br />requested it be allowed to do a fire inspection of the property. Mr. Fred <br />Sedaghat, owner of Valor Enterprises, refused the City access to the <br />building. The City then obtained two administrative search warrants to <br />inspect the building. The first inspection focused on fire codes, while the <br />second focused on building and electrical codes. The City Administrator <br />indicated that the inspectors were shocked at the building conditions <br />which included fire, building, and electrical violations. It was also found <br />that there was a person living in the building. The City Administrator <br />