My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-24-07 Council Workshop Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
10-24-07 Council Workshop Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 1:23:59 PM
Creation date
4/23/2008 2:23:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />OCTOBER 24, 2007 <br />CUL-DE-SAC The Council then discussed cul-de-sac length, with Blesener suggesting <br />LENGTH that a Zoning Code revision that would allow longer cul-de-sacs in <br />exchange for increased lot sizes. Blesener felt that this trade-off would be <br />an enhancement a neighborhood. Blesener suggested that perhaps a CUP <br />process could be developed to allow for this. <br />Montour and Allan felt that the City Code needed to be revised to increase <br />residential side yard setbacks from 7 '/z feet back to the 10 feet that it had <br />previously been at. <br />The City Planner suggested that rather than a CUP process for alonger- <br />cul-de-sac, standards could be developed that would have to be met in <br />order to exceed the 500 foot maximum length. Blesener suggested that the <br />City Planner develop some language that will allow a longer cul-de-sac <br />length in exchange for larger lots. Keis also noted that street connections <br />to adjacent properties must be encouraged. Montour agreed that a trade- <br />off that would result in larger lots would be good. Blesener pointed out <br />that there are a lot of long cul-de-sacs in the City and historically there has <br />not been a problem. Allan noted the City requirement for a connecting <br />street to Viking Drive as part of The Preserve plat given the safety issue <br />related to a major pipeline in that area. <br />Duray noted that the Planner had suggested the creation of a special <br />zoning district that would require larger lots in environmentally sensitive <br />areas. Allan noted that zoning district development standards could be <br />established based on the category of an adjacent wetland. Allan explained <br />the differences between Manage A, B, and C Wetlands. <br />The Planner noted that Little Canada is nearly fully developed, however, <br />there are some undeveloped areas in environmentally sensitive areas. The <br />Planner suggested that a new zoning district could be created for these <br />areas, and that district would include standards that might include larger <br />lots, additional tree preservation, etc. Allan suggested that the Planner <br />also develop stricter tree preservation and tree replacement standards for <br />the ordinance. Blesener suggested that the Planner focus on tough <br />standards for perimeter trees, as trees within building pad areas will be <br />difficult to preserve. There was concern that the development of Richie <br />Place will result in the clear-cutting of trees. <br />SUBDIVISION The City Planner next began a review of the proposed changes to the <br />CODE Subdivision Code. The Council was in agreement with the changes as <br />discussed by the Planner. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.