My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-10-07 Planning Comm. Agenda
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
05-10-07 Planning Comm. Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/1/2008 1:21:53 PM
Creation date
5/1/2008 1:14:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
that their existing Sign Code was incompatible with their City goals and might allow <br />undesirable sign types and sizes in the future. The City also anticipated that there <br />would be additional submittals for constructing new or modifying existing electronic <br />signs. The City determined that the sign moratorium was necessary in order to permit <br />the City Council to review and evaluate changes to the current sign regulations and to <br />preserve the integrity of the planning process. <br />Additional cities have also enacted a moratorium to address the situation and consider <br />options to amend their City code to properly address it, including Minnetonka, Coon <br />Rapids, Alexandria, ~nlhite Bear Lake, and many others. <br />League of Minnesota Cities Study. The League of Minnesota Cities is working with <br />SRF Engineering, who is conducting a study to find out the implications that electronic <br />billboards may have on traffic safety, if any. The League of Minnesota Cities does not <br />expect any results from this study until early this summer. Depending on the results of <br />the study, the League may work on a model ordinance to address this important topic. <br />Pc: Kathy Glanzer <br />Steve Westerhaus <br />Lee Elfering <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.