Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />SEPTEMBER 13, 2007 <br />is in order to serve the property to be developed. Soby pointed out that the <br />locations for future road connections to the east and west were established <br />with the Watershed District as the best locations fiom both a wetland and <br />grading perspective. <br />The City Planner noted that there are two provisions in the ordinance <br />relative to this issue. The first says that cul-de-sac length is limited to 500 <br />feet. That provision refers to the permanent end of a cul-de-sac. The <br />second provision requires that developments provide for the future <br />extension of roadways to provide development access to adjacent <br />properties. In those cases the cul-de-sac is considered a temporary and not <br />subject to the 500 foot limitation. The Planner indicated that with regard to <br />Richie Place, he does not consider the cul-de-sac proposed to be permanent <br />in that it will be extended in the future as adjacent properties are developed. <br />Dave Himmelbach, 2970 LaBore Road, suggested that before development <br />of the Richie property occurs, an archeological assessment of the area is <br />needed. Himmelbach indicated that he believes that there are aboriginal <br />artifacts in the area. He has found rocks with notches in their sides as well <br />as "stun and prey" types of arrowheads. <br />Himmelbach also requested that existing trees be saved specifically those <br />by the road and the holding pond. Himmelbach suggested that rather than <br />clear cut the area, the developer should make efforts to save some of the <br />older trees. While this might be more expensive, it will make for a better <br />project. Himmelbach stated that he did not want to see the hydrology of the <br />pond on his property disturbed as a result of this development. <br />John Gores, 2870 Arcade Street, disagreed with the City Planner's position <br />that the cul-de-sac was temporary, and, therefore, a variance was not <br />necessary. Gores indicated that the City was without authority to allow a <br />cul-de-sac in excess of 500 feet without a variance. Gores indicated that if <br />such a cul-de-sac were approved, the City is setting itself up for litigation. <br />Gores stated that there has been no contact made to the State Water & Soil <br />Conservation Board relative to the delineation on this project. Gores <br />expressed concern about the holding pond that was proposed to be located <br />above his house. He also expressed concern about tree removal. He noted <br />that there is already flooding occurring in this area. <br />Bill Schorn, 2940 LaBore Road, noted that during the concept review <br />conducted in June of 2007 for the Steinert property, issue was taken with <br />the 700 foot cul-de-sac proposed by the developer. Schorn stated that <br />during that review the City Planner indicated that 500 feet is a common <br />standard, and that the limitation is in place for better access by emergency <br />vehicles and to limit the amount of traffic at an intersection. Schorn pointed <br />out that the Richie Place cul-de-sac is twice the maximum length allowed, <br />-7- <br />