My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-12-07 Planning Comm. Agenda
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
07-12-07 Planning Comm. Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/1/2008 1:37:34 PM
Creation date
5/1/2008 1:34:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Minnetonka Planning Commission Staff Report <br />Meeting of June 14, 2007 <br />Brief Description: An ordinance regulating dynamic signs <br />Recommended Action: Recommend that the city council adopt the ordinance <br />Background <br />The city council and planning commission discussed the regulation of dynamic signs at <br />its study session on May 14, 2007. Staff has prepared an ordinance incorporating the <br />direction from that meeting. The major issues are discussed below. <br />In formulating the proposed ordinance, staff consulted with SRF Consulting and Gerald <br />Wachtel, a national expert on changeable message signs. Their final report is attached <br />on pages Al-A42. <br />General Framework <br />The easiest approach to dynamic signs, from both a legal and enforcement standpoint, <br />is to either prohibit all of them or allow them with no restrictions. Instead, the ordinance <br />incorporates a balanced approach to dynamic sign regulation that protects community <br />interests, while recognizing the need to reasonably accommodate evolving sign <br />technologies. <br />The term "dynamic" display is defined in the ordinance to identify all displays that have <br />changing messages, regardless of the means. By avoiding descriptions that identify the <br />type of change, such as "electronic," the ordinance can better deal with future <br />technologies that have not yet been developed. This approach also recognizes that <br />changing messages by any means can be distracting to the driving public. <br />Signs are a form of "speech" protected by federal and state constitutions. As a result, <br />cities must be very careful that sign regulations generally do not discriminate on the <br />basis of message content. It can be a challenge to defend an ordinance that draws fine <br />distinctions when allowing certain kinds of signs to be dynamic while prohibiting others. <br />Accordingly, the dynamic sign provisions will "overlay" the city's existing sign <br />regulations. There would be no change to the existing standards regarding such things <br />as zoning, number, size and location. As a general matter, the dynamic regulations <br />would apply equally to all signs, with few distinctions between zoning districts or <br />between on- and off-premise signs. <br />Although residential districts are deserving of more protection than other zoning <br />districts, that is taken into account in the underlying regulations. Additionally, there are <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.