My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-12-07 Planning Comm. Agenda
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
07-12-07 Planning Comm. Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/1/2008 1:37:34 PM
Creation date
5/1/2008 1:34:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Meeting of June 14, 2007 Page 9 <br />Subject: Dynamic Signs <br />5. The brightness standard of "adequate visibility" may be interpreted to mean a <br />bare minimum when in fact a sign that is too dim may also be distracting because <br />people strain to read it, <br />Response: In an attempt to avoid this unintended interpretation, staff has <br />added two words requested by the company: "No sign may be brighter than is <br />necessary for clear and adequate visibility." <br />The following summarizes Mr. Brown's comments and staffs responses: <br />1. Signs are expensive and it is unlikely that there will be many area with multiple <br />dynamic signs. <br />Response: As technology advances, these signs will become less and less <br />expensive, just like home computers. This trend has already begun. As <br />Daktronics said last year in its 10-Q filing with the Securities and Exchange <br />Commission, its revenues on the sales of its digital displays to outdoor <br />advertising companies has increased in part because of the lower cost of <br />displays. <br />There is no reason to give off-premises signs a shorter duration time than on- <br />premise signs. Logically the opposite is true because off-premises signs are <br />usually larger. <br />Response: As a general rule, the ordinance is not making any distinction <br />between off- and on-premise signs. However, the ordinance provides a shorter <br />duration as an incentive to eliminate billboards on nearly a 2 to 1 basis and to <br />prohibit dynamic displays on an additional billboard. The city is getting significant <br />public safety enhancements in return for these concessions from the off-premise <br />sign owner. On-premise sign owners are in no position to offer the City the same <br />benefits for that privilege. <br />3. On-premise signs are smaller and may need multiple frames to communicate <br />most messages. <br />Response: Studies show that drawn-out messages (such as sequential <br />messages) are more distracting than unrelated messages, and the ordinance <br />won't allow them. There is still a reasonable opportunity to provide a concise <br />message. <br />4. The percent of the sign face and a minimum font size unrelated to distance will <br />make the ability to communicate a message with one frame virtually negligible. <br />Response: Photos in the staff report show examples of existing signs that meet <br />the percent and font size requirements. The font sizes incorporated into the <br />9~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.